Monday, 08, Jun, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Navratan Jaroli vs Ashok Kumar Mehta (2024:Rj-Jd:41304)
2024 Latest Caselaw 8890 Raj

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 8890 Raj
Judgement Date : 9 October, 2024

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur

Navratan Jaroli vs Ashok Kumar Mehta (2024:Rj-Jd:41304) on 9 October, 2024

Author: Rekha Borana

Bench: Rekha Borana

[2024:RJ-JD:41304]

      HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
                       JODHPUR
                S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 13587/2024

Navratan Jaroli S/o Shree Mohan Lal Jaroli, Aged About 45 Years,
R/o 34 Shanti Nagar Mds School Road, Hiranmagri, Section-3,
Udaipur, Rajasthan.
                                                                     ----Petitioner
                                     Versus
Ashok Kumar Mehta S/o Kanhaiya Lal Mehta, Aged About 50
Years, R/o 13 Rishabh Nagar Near Mds School, Hiranmagri,
Section-3, Udaipur, Rajasthan.
                                                                  ----Respondent


For Petitioner(s)          :     Mr. Bhanu Prakash Mathur
For Respondent(s)          :     Mr. Rakesh Chotia



              HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA BORANA

Order

09/10/2024

1. The present writ petition has been preferred aggrieved of the

judgment and decree dated 19.07.2024 passed by the Rent

Appellate Tribunal, Udaipur in Rent Appeal No.06/2021 (C.I.S.

No.06/2021) whereby the judgment and decree dated 10.03.2021

passed by the Rent Tribunal, Udaipur in Rent Case No.40/2016

allowing the application preferred by the respondent-plaintiff-

landlord under Section 9(A) & (J) read with Section 10 of the

Rajasthan Rent Control Act, 2001 seeking eviction of the

petitioner-defendant-tenant has been affirmed.

2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that

the petitioner-tenant needs some reasonable time to vacate the

shop. Learned counsel submitted that he has instructions not to

press this petition on merits but reasonable time may be granted

[2024:RJ-JD:41304] (2 of 3) [CW-13587/2024]

to the petitioner-tenant to vacate the suit shop and to handover

the vacant possession of the same to the respondent-landlord.

3. Learned counsel appearing for the respondent-landlord, on

instructions, does not oppose the submissions as made by learned

counsel appearing for the petitioner-tenant.

4. Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner-

tenant and having perused the judgment and decree/certificate of

the Courts/Tribunals below, the prayer made by learned counsel

for the petitioner-tenant seems to be reasonable and deserves to

be granted subject to the present petition not being pressed on

merits.

5. Accordingly, it is directed that the petitioner-

tenant shall handover the peaceful and vacant possession of the

suit shop to the respondent-plaintiff-landlord within a period of

one and a half year i.e. on or before 30.04.2026 and shall, w.e.f.

01.11.2024, continue to pay mesne profit at the enhanced rate of

Rs.10,000/- per month (Rupees Ten Thousand only) by 15th day of

the next succeeding month or in advance to the respondent-

landlord and in case there is any default in payment of mesne

profit, the period of one and a half year for eviction shall stand

reduced and the decree/certificate of eviction/possession would

become executable forthwith.

6. The petitioner-tenant shall also clear all the arrears of rent, if

any, and mesne profit and pay the same to the respondent-

plaintiff-landlord within three months from today, if not paid till

date, otherwise the same will bear interest @9% per annum.

7. The petitioner-tenant shall also not sublet, assign or part

with the possession of the suit shop or any part thereof in favour

[2024:RJ-JD:41304] (3 of 3) [CW-13587/2024]

of anyone else and would not create any third party interest in the

same during the aforesaid period and if it is so done, the same

would be treated as void.

8. The petitioner-defendant-tenant shall furnish a written

undertaking incorporating the aforesaid conditions in the Trial

Court within a period of two months and one copy thereof along

with affidavit, in this Court.

9. It is made clear that if the peaceful and vacant possession of

the suit premises is not handed over to the respondent-plaintiff-

landlord within a period of one and a half year i.e. upto

30.04.2026, or mesne profits are not paid as directed above,

besides the expeditious execution of the decree/certificate in

normal course, the respondent-plaintiff-landlord shall also be

entitled to invoke the contempt jurisdiction of this Court.

10. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition stands

disposed of.

11. The stay application and all pending applications also stand

disposed of.

(REKHA BORANA),J 279-T.Singh/-

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter