Saturday, 02, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Mehram vs Jaan Mohammad And Ors. ...
2024 Latest Caselaw 8794 Raj

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 8794 Raj
Judgement Date : 8 October, 2024

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur

Mehram vs Jaan Mohammad And Ors. ... on 8 October, 2024

Author: Nupur Bhati

Bench: Nupur Bhati

[2024:RJ-JD:41205]

       HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
                        JODHPUR
                     S.B. Civil Misc. Appeal No. 817/2016

Mehram son of Pehrajram, Aged about 48 years, resident of
Dhadriya Kala, Tehsil Degana, District Nagaur.
                                                             ----Appellant/Claimant
                                        Versus
     1. Jaan Mohammad s/o Mohammad hanif, R/o Mundva, Tehsil
       and District Nagaur.
                         (Vehicle Driver of Truck No. RJ-21-GA-3364)
     2. M/s Ratanlal and Company, Marwar Mundva through
       Proprietor Bankatlal s/o Ratanlal, R/o Mundva, Tehsil and
       District Nagaur.
                   (Reg. Vehicle Owner of Truck No. RJ-21-GA-3364)
     3. National      Insurance       Company          Limited       through   Branch
       Manager Nagaur, Tehsil and District Nagaur, Rajasthan.
                (Insurance Company of Truck No. RJ-21-GA-3364)
                                               ----Respondents/Non-Claimants


For Appellant(s)              :     Mr. Nirupam Gupta
For Respondent(s)             :     Mr. Kuldeep Vaishnav for Insurance
                                    Company



               HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE NUPUR BHATI

Order

08/10/2024

1. The appellant-claimant has preferred this appeal under

Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act being aggrieved of the

judgment-cum-award dated 12.01.2016 passed by the learned

Judge, MACT, Nagaur, in MAC No.02/2014 titled "Mehram Versus

Jaan Mohammad and Ors." whereby, the appellant was awarded

an amount of Rs.31,000/- along with interest 7.5% per annum

towards compensation owing to the injury to the appellant in a

road accident which took place on 03.03.2012, while fastening the

liability upon all the respondents.

[2024:RJ-JD:41205] (2 of 4) [CMA-817/2016]

2. Brief facts of the case are that on 03.03.2012 the appellant

was standing near the Nemaram Khati's shop at village Kuchera, a

truck bearing No.RJ-21-GA-3364 came in high speed and hit the

appellant, as a result of which, he fell down and his leg, head,

mouth and other parts got injured and made him permanently

disabled. Subsequently, an FIR was registered and challan was

filed.

3. On account of the injuries sustained by the appellant, he

claimed a compensation of Rs.13,01,500/- due to the injuries

sustained by him. The learned Tribunal after hearing the parties

awarded a sum of Rs.31,000/- along with interest 7.5% per

annum.

4. Thus being aggrieved of the meager amount of

compensation, the appellant-claimant has preferred this appeal

seeking enhancement of the award passed by the learned

Tribunal.

5. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the appellant

has received nine injuries which are simple in nature and the

amount awarded by the learned Tribunal is on the lower side. He

also submits that the learned Tribunal has not awarded any

compensation towards loss of income incurred by the appellant-

claimant for the three days of hospitalization.

6. Per contra, learned counsel for the respondents submits that

the amount awarded by the learned Tribunal is true and correct

and does not deserve to be modified.

7. I have heard and considered the submissions advanced at

bar and have gone through the impugned award and the original

record.

[2024:RJ-JD:41205] (3 of 4) [CMA-817/2016]

8. Taking into consideration that the appellant-claimant has

suffered nine injuries and in view of judgment passed by the

Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Sidram Vs. The Divisional

Manager, United India Insurance Company Ltd & Anr: (Civil

Appeal No.8510 of 2022) decided on 16.11.2022, this Court

deems it just to award Rs.2,500/- for each simple injury suffered

by the appellant-claimant and Rs.700/- for each day when the

appellant-claimant remained hospitalized, on account of the said

accident considering his loss of income, the amount of

compensation towards the simple injuries suffered by the claimant

should be Rs.2500 x 9 =Rs.22,500/-, and Rs.700 x 3 = Rs.2100/-.

Thus, the award is modified as under :-

PARTICULARS                                       Awarded by Enhanced/
                                                  learned    Modified by
                                                  Tribunal   this Court
Simple Injury                                     Rs.9,000/-        Rs.22,500/-

Loss of Income on account of Not awarded Rs.2100/- Hospitalization for a period of 3 days (Rs.700/- x 3) Medical Expenses Rs.21,145/- Rs.21,145/- Compensation towards special diet, Rs.600/- Rs.600/-

attendant charges
TOTAL                                             Rs.30,745/- Rs.46,345/-
                                                  (Rounding
                                                  Off       to
                                                  Rs.31,000/-)
ENHANCED             AWARD         (Rs.46,345/-             minus Rs.15,345/-
Rs.31,000/-)                                                      (Rounding
                                                                  Off       to
                                                                  Rs.15,600/-)


9. Thus, the present misc. appeal is partly allowed and the

appellant-claimant is entitled to get enhanced compensation of

Rs.15,600/-. The judgment-cum-award dated 12.01.2016 passed

[2024:RJ-JD:41205] (4 of 4) [CMA-817/2016]

by the learned Judge, MACT, Nagaur, in MAC No.02/2014, is

modified accordingly. The respondents/non-claimants are directed

to pay the said amount along with the interest, as awarded by

learned Tribunal from the date of filing of claim petition to the

appellant within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of

certified copy of this judgment.

10. No order as to costs.

(DR. NUPUR BHATI),J 54-Ajay/-

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter