Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 6135 Raj/2
Judgement Date : 16 October, 2024
[2024:RJ-JP:43386]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 6926/2024
1. Babulal Agrawal S/o Shri Ramavtar Agrawal, Resident Of
177, Pratapgarh, Thanagaji, Alwar, Rajasthan.
2. Varsha Agrawal W/o Shri Babulal Agrawal, Resident Of
177, Pratapgarh, Thanagaji, Alwar, Rajasthan.
3. Kamlesh Solanki S/o Shri Ramjilal, Resident Of 212,
Harijan Mohalla, Pratapgarh, Thanagaji, Alwar, Rajasthan.
----Petitioners
Versus
1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor.
2. Srng Finance Pvt. Ltd., Through Authorised Representative Mitesh Gautam, Corporate Office- 811, 8Th Floor, Signature Tower, Lalkothi, Jaipur, Rajasthan, Registered Office- C-94, Lalkothi, Jaipur, Rajasthan.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Jai Kishan Yogi
For Respondent(s) : Mr. M.S. Shekhawat, PP
Mr. Rishi Raj Singh Rathore, PP
Complainant : Mr. Pankaj Kumar
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN
Order
16/10/2024
1. This petition under Section 528 B.N.S.S., 2023 is filed, with a
prayer to quash the FIR No. 467/2023 registered at Police Station
Bajaj Nagar, District Jaipur City (East) for offences under Sections
420, 406, 467, 468, 471 and 120-B of IPC, on the basis of
compromise effectuated between the parties herein, in respect of
their inter-se dispute.
[2024:RJ-JP:43386] (2 of 3) [CRLMP-6926/2024]
2. Learned counsel for both the parties have submitted that the
dispute at hand is inter-se private in nature, which has been
resolved by the parties amicably.
3. Heard and considered.
4. At the outset, this Court deems it appropriate to place
reliance upon the judgment passed by the Hon'ble Apex Court in
Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab [(2012) 10 SCC 303] and
Ramgopal Vs. The State of Madhya Pradesh reported in
[2022 (14) SCC 531], relevant portion of which is reproduced
below:
"12. The High Court, therefore, having regard to the
nature of the offence and the fact that parties have
amicably settled their dispute and the victim has willingly
consented to the nullification of criminal proceedings, can
quash such proceedings in exercise of its inherent powers
under Section 482 Cr.P.C., even if the offences are non-
compoundable."
5. In view of the position of law laid down by the Hon'ble Apex
Court in aforementioned case, and considering the personal nature
of dispute, which has been amicably settled between parties, this
Court deems it just and proper to allow the present misc. petition.
Compromise is taken on record.
6. Considering the aforementioned, the present criminal
miscellaneous petition is allowed and the FIR No. 467/2023
registered at Police Station Bajaj Nagar, District Jaipur City (East)
with all consequential proceedings, are hereby quashed and set
aside.
[2024:RJ-JP:43386] (3 of 3) [CRLMP-6926/2024]
7. Accordingly, the instant petition is allowed. Pending
application(s), if any, stand disposed of.
(SAMEER JAIN),J
Neeru/72
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!