Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 4739 Raj
Judgement Date : 27 May, 2024
[2024:RJ-JD:23928]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Misc(Pet.) No. 2512/2024
Prakash Chand S/o Asha Ram, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Sanvrij,
Police Station Phalodi District Phalodi
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Kailash Khilery
Mr. Naresh Bishnoi
For Respondent(s) : Mr. Abhishek Purohit, AGA
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FARJAND ALI
Order
27/05/2024
1. By way of filing the instant criminal misc. petition, challenge
has been made to the order dated 18.01.2024 passed by the
learned Additional Session Judge (Special Judge NDPS Act
Cases), Phalodi, District Jodhpur in Criminal Misc. Case
No.38/2024 pertaining to FIR No.305/2020 registered at
Police Station Baap, District Phalodi, whereby the prayer
made by the petitioner for releasing the vehicle in question
(Motorcycle) bearing registration No. RJ-43-SD-6182, has
been declined.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner
is the owner of the vehicle in question which has been seized
by the Police Officers. He further submits that the petitioner
being the owner of the vehicle in question, is the person best
[2024:RJ-JD:23928] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-2512/2024]
entitled to get back the possession of the seized property.
There is no other person claiming supurdagi of the same.
3. Learned Additional Government Advocate has opposed the
instant criminal misc. petition.
4. Considering the submissions and following the judgment
rendered by Hon'ble the Supreme Court in the case of
Sunderbhai Ambalal Desai Vs. State of Gujarat reported
in AIR 2003 SC 638 and the order dated 18.11.2022
passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Criminal Appeal
No. 2005/2022 [SLP (Crl.) No.7280/2022] titled as
Sainaba Vs. The State of Kerala & Anr., wherein, the
vehicle involved in a crime under NDPS Act was directed to
be released on terms and conditions to be determined by the
Special Court, the instant criminal misc. petition is allowed
and this Court deems it just and appropriate to release the
vehicle in question in favour of the petitioner on interim
custody till conclusion of the trial provided he furnishes a
Supurdaginama of Rs.50,000/- and surety of like amount to
the satisfaction of the Court below.
(FARJAND ALI),J
222-Ashutosh/-
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!