Monday, 08, Jun, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Shaheed Hussain Farooqi vs The Rajasthan State Road Transport ...
2024 Latest Caselaw 4732 Raj

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 4732 Raj
Judgement Date : 27 May, 2024

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur

Shaheed Hussain Farooqi vs The Rajasthan State Road Transport ... on 27 May, 2024

Author: Rekha Borana

Bench: Rekha Borana

[2024:RJ-JD:24043]

      HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
                       JODHPUR
                 S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 8223/2024

Shaheed Hussain Farooqi S/o Late Shri Talib Hussain Farooqi,
Aged About 52 Years, B/c Farooqi Muslim, R/o House No. 1 A 12,
Madhuban Housing Board, Basni, First Phase, Jodhpur (Raj.).-
342005.
                                                                         ----Petitioner
                                         Versus
1.       The Rajasthan State Road Transport Corpration, Through
         Its Managing Director, Head Office, Parivahan Marg,
         Choumu House, Jaipur (Raj.).
2.       The Executive Director (Administration), Rajasthan State
         Road Transport Corporation, Head Office, Parivahan Marg,
         Chaumu House, Jaipur (Raj.).
3.       The Chief Manager, Rajasthan State Road Transport
         Corporation, Jodhpur Depot, District Jodhpur (Raj.).
                                                                      ----Respondents


For Petitioner(s)              :    Mr. Kanishk Sharma



              HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA BORANA

Order

27/05/2024

1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

controversy involved in the writ petition is squarely covered by a

judgment of this Court rendered in S.B. Civil Writ Petition

No.8810/2014, Tara Chand Vs. Rajasthan State Road

Transport Corporation & Anr. (decided on 25.01.2017) in the

following terms:-

"Apparently, by effect of the above circular, benefit of second selection scale falling due to the petitioner could only have been deferred by two years and not more. In this background, the

[2024:RJ-JD:24043] (2 of 3) [CW-8223/2024]

decision of the respondent Corporation to defer second selection scale admissible to the petitioner from 6.10.2008 to 6.10.2019 is totally unjustified, arbitrary and contrary to the circulars adopted by the Corporation.

The impugned action of the respondents is thus quashed and struck down. The respondents shall extend the benefit of second selection scale to the petitioner by making a deferment of two years from the date of his actual entitlement. Monetary benefits flowing from the above direction shall be paid to the petitioner within a period of six months from today with interest @ 6% per annum from the date of accrual till the date of actual payment. In case, the payment is delayed beyond three months, the interest shall stand enhanced to 9% per annum and shall be recoverable from the official/s responsible for causing the delay if any.

The writ petition is allowed in these terms. No order as to costs."

Learned counsel further submits that the order dated

25.01.2017 was affirmed by the Division Bench in D.B. Civil

Special Appeal (Writ) No.524/2018 decided on 02.12.2021.

Against the order dated 02.12.2021 passed by the Division Bench

of this Court, a Special Leave Petition No.10330/2022 was

preferred before Hon'ble The Supreme Court and the same was

also dismissed vide judgment dated 13.07.2022.

In this view of the matter, the learned counsel for the

petitioner submits that the petitioner may be permitted to file a

representation before the respondents, who shall consider the

[2024:RJ-JD:24043] (3 of 3) [CW-8223/2024]

same in light of the judgment rendered by this Court in the case

of Tara Chand (supra).

2. In view of the limited prayer made by the learned counsel for

the petitioner, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction

that in the event of filing a representation by the petitioner, the

respondents shall decide the same within a period of four weeks

from the date of its receipt, keeping in mind the law laid down by

this Court in the case of Tara Chand (supra).

The order has been passed based on the submissions made

in the petition, the respondents would be free to examine the

veracity of the submissions made in the petition and only in case,

the averments made therein are found to be correct, the petitioner

would be entitled to the relief.

3. Stay application also stand disposed of, accordingly.

(REKHA BORANA),J 2-Vij/-

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter