Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 4627 Raj
Judgement Date : 23 May, 2024
[2024:RJ-JD:23607]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 16110/2019
1. Mahipal Bishnoi S/o Shri Rughnath Ram, Aged About 33
Years, B/c Bishnoi, R/o Neem Ki Dhani, Sainsar,
Nathursar, Bikaner, District Bikaner (Raj.).
2. Vimala D/o Shri Bhanwar Lal,, Aged About 28 Years, R/o
Vpo Kahira, Chitana, Bikaner, District Bikaner (Raj.).
3. Kripal Singh S/o Shri Ashok Singh,, Aged About 33 Years,
R/o 7/100, Mukta Prasad Nagar, Sector- 7, Bikaner,
District Bikaner.
----Petitioners
Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary, Department
Of Rural Development And Panchayati Raj, Secretariat,
Rajasthan, Jaipur.
2. The Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad Bikaner.
3. The Vikas Adhikari, Panchayat Samiti, Panchu, District
Bikaner.
----Respondents
Connected With
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 14386/2019
Pradeep Beniwal S/o Shri Ramniwas, Aged About 30 Years, By
Caste Jat, R/o Village Roda, Tehsil Nokha, District Bikaner (Raj.).
----Petitioner
Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary, Department
Of Rural Development And Panchayati Raj, Secretariat,
Rajasthan, Jaipur.
2. The Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad Bikaner.
3. The Vikas Adhikari, Panchayat Samiti, Panchu, District
Bikaner.
----Respondents
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 14902/2019
Laxminarayan Upadhyay S/o Shri Ganesharam Upadhyay, Aged
About 40 Years, By Caste Upadhyay, R/o Ward No. 2, Majisa
Mandir Ke Pass, Gram Meghasar, Kolasar, Bikaner, District
Bikaner (Raj.).
(Downloaded on 23/05/2024 at 08:41:26 PM)
[2024:RJ-JD:23607] (2 of 2) [CW-16110/2019]
----Petitioner
Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary, Department
Of Rural Development And Panchayati Raj, Secretariat,
Rajasthan, Jaipur.
2. The Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad, Bikaner.
3. The Vikas Adhikari, Panchayat Samiti Panchu, District
Bikaner.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sunil Chhabra
For Respondent(s) : Mr. Lalit Pareek
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MONGA
Order
23/05/2024
1. Both the learned counsels are ad idem that the controversy
raised by the petitioners herein is no more res-integra in view of
the judgment rendered by a co-ordinate Bench of this Court at
Jaipur in the case of Hanuman Swami Vs. State of Rajasthan
& Ors. : D.B. Civil Special Appeal(W) No.439/2014, decided
on 03.11.2016.
2. In view of the aforesaid consensus, the instant writ petitions
arso also disposed of by joint consent in the same terms as
judgment ibid.
4. All pending application(s), if any, also disposed of.
(ARUN MONGA),J 313-315-skm/-
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!