Monday, 08, Jun, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

The Union Of India vs Rampal Singh Son Of Shri Janglia
2024 Latest Caselaw 3405 Raj/2

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 3405 Raj/2
Judgement Date : 2 May, 2024

Rajasthan High Court

The Union Of India vs Rampal Singh Son Of Shri Janglia on 2 May, 2024

Author: Narendra Singh Dhaddha

Bench: Narendra Singh Dhaddha

[2024:RJ-JP:20600]

        HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
                    BENCH AT JAIPUR

              S.B. Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No. 501/2022

The Union Of India, Through General Manager, North Central
Railway, Allahabad (U.p.).
                                                                    ----Appellant
                                     Versus
Rampal Singh Son Of Shri Janglia, Aged About 24 Years,
Resident Of Village Bhavanpura, Roopwas, District Bharatpur
(Raj.).
                                                                  ----Respondent
For Appellant(s)           :     Mr. Gaurav Jain, Adv.
For Respondent(s)          :      Mr. Ajay Shukla, Adv.



HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA

Judgment

DATE OF JUDGMENT 02/05/2024

The present appeal under Section 23 of the Railway Claims

Tribunal Act, 1987 has been preferred by the appellant-Union of

India (for short 'the Union of India') against the judgment and

award dated 31.08.2021 passed by the Railway Claims Tribunal

Jaipur Bench (for short 'the Tribunal') in O.A.-II-219/2017,

whereby the Tribunal has awarded a sum of Rs.4,00,000/- along

with interest @ 9% per annum from the date of incident as

compensation in favour of the claimant-respondent (for short 'the

claimant').

Learned counsel for the Union of India submits that the

Tribunal has not taken into consideration the material available on

record in right perspective. So, the judgment passed by the

Tribunal is erroneous, illegal and perverse and is liable to be set

[2024:RJ-JP:20600] (2 of 3) [CMA-501/2022]

aside. Learned counsel for the Union of India further submits that

the claimant was not a bona fide passenger within the meaning of

Section 2(29) read with Section 124A of the Railways Act, 1989.

Learned counsel for the Union of India further submits that on the

date of incident i.e. 04.08.2017, the claimant was not having a

ticket when the guard made query from him. Learned counsel for

the Union of India further submits that the claimant arranged the

ticket at the belated stage for taking the compensation amount.

Learned counsel for the Union of India further submits that the

claimant to met with an accident when he was running from

offside in the process of boarding the moving train, he fell down

and sustained multiple injuries. So, the liability cannot be fastened

on Union of India to pay the amount of compensation to the

claimant. So, judgment dated 31.08.2021 passed by the Tribunal

is liable to be set aside.

Learned counsel for the claimant has opposed the arguments

advanced by the learned counsel for the Union of India and

submitted that on the date of incident i.e. 04.08.2017, the

claimant was having a valid ticket. He exhibited the ticket as Ex.

A-2 during evidence and he fell down due to push from the fellow

coach passengers from the moving train. So, the Tribunal has

rightly awarded the compensation amount to him. So, the appeal

being devoid of merit, is liable to be dismissed.

Learned counsel for the claimant has relied upon the

following judgments:- (1) Suman Sharma Vs. Union of India

reported decided on 20.07.2018 in FAO No. 3960 of 2011;

(2) Union of India Vs. Prabhakaran Vijaya Kumar and Ors.

decided on 05.05.2008 in Appeal (Civil) 6898 of 2002; and

[2024:RJ-JP:20600] (3 of 3) [CMA-501/2022]

(3) Union of India Vs. Smt. Neeri Devi and Ors. decided on

09.11.2021 in Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No. 4618/2016.

I have considered the arguments advanced by the learned

counsel for the Union of India as well as learned counsel for the

claimant.

While allowing the claim petition, the Tribunal elaborately

discussed the issue Nos. 1 to 3. During the evidence, the claimant

exhibited the ticket as Ex. A-2. So, it cannot be said that he was

not a bona fide passenger. As per evidence, claimant fell down due

to push from the fellow coach passengers from the moving train.

So, in my considered opinion, the Tribunal has rightly awarded the

compensation amount of Rs. 4,00,000/- in favour of the claimant.

So, the present appeal being devoid of merit, are liable to be

dismissed, which stands dismissed accordingly.

Pending application(s), if any, stands dismissed.

(NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA),J

Tahir/65

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter