Thursday, 23, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Laxman Dass Jaswani S/O Shri Jaggu Mal ... vs The Chairman Cum Managing Director, ...
2024 Latest Caselaw 3339 Raj/2

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 3339 Raj/2
Judgement Date : 1 May, 2024

Rajasthan High Court

Laxman Dass Jaswani S/O Shri Jaggu Mal ... vs The Chairman Cum Managing Director, ... on 1 May, 2024

Author: Sameer Jain

Bench: Sameer Jain

[2024:RJ-JP:20351]

        HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
                    BENCH AT JAIPUR

                 S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 6479/2024

Laxman Dass Jaswani S/o Shri Jaggu Mal Jaswani, Aged About
66 Years, Resident Of 8/102, Malviya Nagar, Jaipur (Raj.)
                                                                    ----Petitioner
                                    Versus
1.       The Chairman Cum Managing Director, Rvpnl, Rvpnl Office
         Vidyut Bhawan, Jaipur-302005.
2.       The    Secretary       (Admn.),     Rvpnl,       Rvpnl    Office   Vidyut
         Bhawan, Jaipur-302005.
3.       The Superintendant Engineer (Qc-Inspection And Montg.),
         Rvpnl, Vidyut Bhawan, Jaipur-302005.
4.       The Joint Secretary (Pension), Rvpnl, Chambal Power
         House, Hawa Sadak, Jaipur (Raj.).
5.       Assistant Secretary (Estt.-Iii), Rvpnl, Vidyut Bhawan,
         Jaipur-302005.
6.       Executive Engineer (Ptcc), Rvpnl, Vidyut Bhawan, Jaipur-
         302005.
                                                                 ----Respondents

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Bajrang Lal Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rajesh Kumar for Mr. Indresh Sharma

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN

Order

01/05/2024

1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the issue

involved in the present matter is no more res integra in view of

judgment of Division Bench of this Court in the case of Ramesh

Chander Gupta vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. (D.B. Civil Writ

Petition No. 2800/2021; decided on 17.10.2023). It is

further submitted that in similar facts and circumstances, the

[2024:RJ-JP:20351] (2 of 3) [CW-6479/2024]

order of the Division Bench has also been followed by Co-ordinate

Bench in the case of Ramesh Chand vs. State of Rajasthan &

Ors. (S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 19121/2023; decided on

07.12.2023).

2. Learned counsel for the respondent does not dispute the fact

that the issue, as raised in the present writ petition, is similar to

Ramesh Chander Gupta (supra). However, it is contended that

the petitioner has approached the Court at a belated stage.

3. Heard.

4. The fact that the issue involved is covered by Division Bench

of this Court in case of Ramesh Chander Gupta (supra)

remains undisputed. The contention that the petitioner has

approached the Court with a little delay is of no relevancy in the

facts and circumstances as matters of salary and pension have a

recurring cause of action, as was held by the Hon'ble Supreme

Court in Rushibhai Jagdishbhai Pathak vs. Bhavnagar

Municipal Corporation: 2022 (4) SLR 862 (SC).

5. In the case of Ramesh Chander Gupta (supra), Division

Bench of this Court inter-alia while referring to orders passed in

Union of India & Ors. vs. Manohar Lal & Ors. (D.B. Civil Writ

Petition No.5445/2022; decided on 07.08.2023) & the

Commissioner, Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan & Anr. vs.

Ram Karan Bhakar & Ors. (D.B. Civil Writ Petition

No.4139/2022) as well as judgment of Hon'ble Supreme Court

in the case of The Director (Admn. and HR) KPTCL & Ors. vs.

C.P. Mundinamani & Ors.: 2023 SCC OnlineSC 401 has

passed the following directions:-

[2024:RJ-JP:20351] (3 of 3) [CW-6479/2024]

"It is also brought to the notice of this Court that Special Leave Petition (C) No.3420/2023 and Special Leave Petition (C) No.1001/2023 have also been dis- posed off on 19.05.2023. A copy of orders dated 11.04.2023 and 19.05.2023 passed by Hon'ble Supreme Court have also been placed on record.

Therefore, the present petitions are also disposed off on the same terms with direction to the respondents to consider the claim of the petitioners and pass ap- propriate orders and other consequential benefits as per their entitlement. Whatever amount is found payable be also released within a period of one month. Accordingly, the present petitions are dis-posed of."

6. In light of the subsequent developments and the change in

legal position, the petitioner shall be at liberty to file a detailed

representation before the concerned authority within a period of

10 days, which shall be adjudicated upon by the said authority

within a further period of 60 days, after having effectuated

compliance with the principles of natural justice and also, the law

applicable.

7. In light of the aforesaid, the instant petition is disposed of.

Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of.

(SAMEER JAIN),J

Pooja /85

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IDRC

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter