Monday, 08, Jun, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Ram Kunwar Gurjar vs Shankar Lal And Others
2024 Latest Caselaw 1788 Raj/2

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 1788 Raj/2
Judgement Date : 14 March, 2024

Rajasthan High Court

Ram Kunwar Gurjar vs Shankar Lal And Others on 14 March, 2024

Author: Narendra Singh Dhaddha

Bench: Narendra Singh Dhaddha

[2024:RJ-JP:12712]

        HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
                    BENCH AT JAIPUR

            S.B. Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No. 3305/2014

Ram Kunwar Gurjar S/o Gopi Lal Gurjar, R/o Village Sardarpura,
P.s. Dhunni, District Tonk Raj.
                                                                    ----Appellant
                                    Versus
1.       Shankar Lal S/o Sanwar Lal, R/o Pandheer, Jahajpur,
         District Bhilwara Raj.
2.       Babu Lal S/o Ram Suram Saini, R/o Dhandi Jhajhu Wala,
         Ward No. 16, Shahpura, Tehsil-Shahpura, District Jaipur
         Raj.
3.       New India Insurance Company Ltd., Branch Office At
         Opposite     Prem         Mandir          Cinema,        Tonk     Road,
         Sawaimadhopur
                                                                 ----Respondents

For Appellant(s) : Mr. Deepak Khandelwal For Respondent(s) : Mr. N.K. Jain

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA

Judgment

DATE OF JUDGMENT :: 14/03/2024

The present appeal under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicle

Act, 1988 has been preferred by the appellant-claimant (for short

'the claimant') dissatisfied with the judgment and award dated

15.07.2014 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Tonk

(for short 'the Tribunal') in claim case No.418/2012, whereby the

Tribunal has awarded a sum of Rs.3,67,022/- along with interest

@ 7% per annum from the date of filing the claim petition in

favour of the claimant.

The Tribunal on the basis of the pleading of the parties,

framed the issues and evaluated the evidence on record. After

[2024:RJ-JP:12712] (2 of 4) [CMA-3305/2014]

hearing counsel for the parties, decided the claim petition of the

claimant and awarded the amount as indicated above.

Learned counsel for the claimant submits that the Tribunal

has erred in assessing the income of the claimant as Rs. 3,500/-

per month. Learned counsel for the claimant further submits that

minimum wages prevailed at the time of accident were Rs.147/-

per day. So, income of the claimant may be calculated as Rs.147/-

per day. Learned counsel for the claimant further submits that the

Tribunal has not awarded any amount towards future prospects

whereas as per the age of the claimant, he is entitled to get 40%

of his income towards future prospects. Learned counsel for the

claimant further submits that the claimant remained hospitalized

for 24 days but the Tribunal has awarded only Rs. 8,200/-

whereas it should be Rs. 500/- per day. So, judgment and award

of the Tribunal may be modified accordingly.

Learned counsel for the respondent No.3-New India

Insurance Company Ltd.(for short 'the Insurance Company') has

opposed the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the

claimant and submitted that the Tribunal has rightly granted Rs.

3,67,022/- as compensation to the claimant. So, the present

appeal filed by the claimant be dismissed.

I have considered the arguments advanced by learned

counsel for the claimant as well as learned counsel for the

Insurance Company.

The Tribunal has erred in assessing the income of the

claimant as Rs. 3,500/- per month. At the time of accident,

prevailing minimum wages were Rs.147/- per day. So, income of

the claimant be calculated on the basis of minimum wages of Rs.

[2024:RJ-JP:12712] (3 of 4) [CMA-3305/2014]

147/- per day. The Tribunal has not awarded any amount towards

future prospects. At the time of accident, age of the claimant was

35 years, so, he is entitled to get 40% of his income towards

future prospects. The Tribunal has granted very meager amount

of Rs. 8,200/- towards hospitalization. The claimant remained

hospitalized for 24 days, so, in my considered opinion, claimant is

entitled to get Rs. 12,000/- towards hospitalization expenses. So,

the judgment of the Tribunal is modified to the extent as under:-

           Monthly income                              147X30= Rs.4,410/-

           Annual Income                             4410X12= Rs.52,920/-
    According to the age of the                     52920X16= Rs.8,46,720/-
 claimant i.e. 35 years, Multiplier
         16 to be applied
      For 31% for permanent                    8,46,720 X31%= Rs.2,62,483/-
            disability
     Add 40% towards future                             2,62,483+1,04,993
           prospects                                      =Rs.3,67,476/-
 For two grievous injuries (5,000
   X 2) and one simple injury                                 Rs.11,000/-
 (1,000 X 1), as awarded by the
             Tribunal
  For Hospitalization for 24 days
       @ Rs. 500/- per day                                    Rs.12,000/-

     For Medical Expenses, as
     awarded by the Tribunal                                Rs.1,39,502/-

                 Total
                                                             Rs.5,29,978-
   Less amount awarded by the
            Tribunal                                        Rs.3,67,022/-

        Enhanced Amount of
           compensation                                5,29,978-3,67,022=

                                                            Rs.1,62,956/-



In view of the above, the claimant is entitled to get a further

sum of Rs.1,62,956/- as compensation. The Insurance Company is

[2024:RJ-JP:12712] (4 of 4) [CMA-3305/2014]

directed to deposit enhanced amount of Rs.1,62,956/- (5,29,978-

3,67,022) with the Tribunal within a period of two months from

the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. On deposition of

the said amount, the claimant shall be entitled to withdrawn the

same. The enhanced amount shall carry interest @ 7% interest

per annum from the date of filing the claim petition till the actual

payment is made.

Rest part of the impugned judgment shall remain

unchanged. Impugned judgment and award is modified

accordingly.

Consequently, the appeal is partly allowed.

Pending application(s), if any, also stand(s) disposed of.

(NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA),J

Ritu/70

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter