Wednesday, 13, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Satya Narayan S/O Lakkha Ram vs State Of Rajasthan (2024:Rj-Jp:10893)
2024 Latest Caselaw 1496 Raj/2

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 1496 Raj/2
Judgement Date : 4 March, 2024

Rajasthan High Court

Satya Narayan S/O Lakkha Ram vs State Of Rajasthan (2024:Rj-Jp:10893) on 4 March, 2024

Author: Ganesh Ram Meena

Bench: Ganesh Ram Meena

[2024:RJ-JP:10893]

        HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
                    BENCH AT JAIPUR

                 S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 3193/2024

1.       Satya Narayan S/o Lakkha Ram, Aged About 61 Years,
         R/o 203, Subhash Nagar-Ii, Near Water Tank, Kota,
         Rajasthan.
2.       Abdul Huq Ansari S/o Kamaruddin Ansari, Aged About 60
         Years, R/o Khatik Mohalla, Awan, Tehsil Kanwas, District
         Kota, Rajasthan.
3.       Satya Narayan Sharma S/o Mahada Ram Sharma, Aged
         About 67 Years, R/o 74, Rajputo Ka Mohalla, Purani Basti,
         Doodwa, District Jhunjhunu, Rajasthan.
4.       Jagdish Prasad Meena S/o Kishana Ram Meena, Aged
         About 61 Years, R/o Village Lambor Chhipiyan, Post
         Lambor Bari, Tehsil Rajgarh, District Churu, Rajasthan.
5.       Kishan Lal Nayak S/o Mota Ram, Aged About 67 Years,
         R/o Jai Public School Ke Pass, Nayti Basti, Nayakan,
         District Jhunjhunu, Rajasthan.
6.       Janki Lal Mali S/o Mag Raj Mali, Aged About 63 Years, R/o
         Near Mochiyo Ka Kuwa, Ward No. 20, Laxmangarh,
         District Sikar, Rajasthan.
7.       Karan Singh Hada S/o Onkar Singh Hada, Aged About 66
         Years, R/o H. No. 250, Dadabari Extension Scheme, Near
         Jhule Lal Dharmshala, Kota, Rajasthan.
8.       Shiv Raj Singh Solanki S/o Bhanwar Singh Solanki, Aged
         About 60 Years, R/o H. No. 446, Khade Ganesh Ji Ke
         Pass, Ganesh Nagar, Kota, Rajasthan.
9.       Keshav Dutt Chandersena S/o Sagar Mal Chandersena,
         Aged About 63 Years, R/o H. No. B-22, Near Maszid,
         Keshavpura, Kota, Rajasthan.
10.      Ashok Kumar Sharma S/o Ratan Lal, Aged About 62
         Years, R/o 1 Va 3, Dadabari Extn., Kota, Rajasthan.
11.      Rajendra  Kumar      Chandrasena     S/o Sagar  Mal
         Chandrasena, Aged About 71 Years, R/o H. No. 1 H 6,
         Mahaveer Nagar-Iii, Kota, Rajasthan.
                                                                 ----Petitioners
                                    Versus
1.       State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Principal Secretary,
         School   Education Department,  Govt.    Secretariat,
         Rajasthan, Jaipur.
2.       State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Principal                     Finance
         Secretary, Secretariat, Rajasthan, Jaipur.
3.       State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal                      Secretary,
         Department Of Forest, Government Of                        Rajasthan,
         Government Secretariat, Jaipur
4.       The Director, Secondary Education, Rajasthan, Bikaner.
5.       The Director, Elementary Education, Rajasthan, Bikaner.

                     (Downloaded on 15/03/2024 at 09:39:06 PM)
 [2024:RJ-JP:10893]                        (2 of 4)                             [CW-3193/2024]


6.       Principal Chief Conservator Of Forest, Jaipur.
7.       The Registrar, Board Of Revenue, Rajasthan, Ajmer.
8.       The District Collector, Jhunjhunu.
9.       The District Collector, Sikar.
10.      The Director, Treasury                   And      Accounts           Department,
         Rajasthan, Jaipur.
11.      The Director, Department Of Pension And Pensioners
         Welfare, Rajasthan, Jaipur.
                                                                           ----Respondents


For Petitioner(s)              :     Mr. Ram Pratap Saini
                                     Mr. Aamir Khan
For Respondent(s)              :



           HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA

                               Judgment / Order

04/03/2024

1.    Learned        counsel       for   the     petitioners          submits     that    the

controversy involved in the present case is squarely covered by

the Division Bench judgment in the case of Ramesh Chander

Gupta Vs. State of Raj                               and Ors. (D.B. Civil Writ

Petition     No.      2800/2021)             and      other      connected         matters,

decided on 17.10.2023.

2.    In these circumstances, learned counsel for the petitioners

seeks liberty to approach respondent/s by way of filing

representation for redressal of their grievances in the light of

judgment rendered by this court in the case of Ramesh Chander

Gupta (supra).

3. In the case of Ramesh Chander Gupta (supra), Division

Bench of this Court inter-alia while referring to orders passed in

Union of India & Ors. Vs. Manohar Lal & Ors.: D.B. Civil Writ

Petition No. 5445/2022, dediced on 07.08.2023 & the

[2024:RJ-JP:10893] (3 of 4) [CW-3193/2024]

Commissioner, K Vidyalaya Sangathan & Anr. Vs.

Ram Karan Bhakar & Ors.: D.B. Civil Writ Petition No.

4139/2022 as well as judgment of Hon'ble Supreme Court in

the c of Director (Admn. & HR) KPTCL & Ors. Vs. C.P.

Mundinamani & Ors.: 2023 SCC online SC 401 has passed the

following directions:-

"It is also brought to the notice of this Court that Special Leave Petition (C) No. 3420/2023 and Special Leave Petition (C) No. 1011/2023 have also been disposed off on 19.05.2023. A copy of the orders dated 11.04.2023 and 19.05.2023 passed by Hon'ble Supreme Court have also been placed on record. Therefore, the present petitions are also disposed off on the same terms with direction to the respondents to consider the claim of the petitioners and pass appropriate orders and other consequential benefits as per their entitlement. Whatever amount is found payable be also released within a period of one month. Accordingly, the present petitions are disposed of."

4. Ordered accordingly.

5. In the event of filing a representation by the petitioners, the

respondent/s shall consider the claim of the petitioners and pass

an appropriate order within two months from the date of receipt of

representation with certified copy of this order and that too in

accordance with law and the observations made in the case of

Ramesh Chander Gupta (supra), read with order dated

11. in SLP(C) No. 3420/2023 and order dated

19.05.2023 in SLP(C) No. 1011/2023 p by Hon'ble

Apex Court, as has been referred in the case of C.P.

Mundinamani & Ors. (supra).

6. The present writ petition stands disposed of.

7. The order has been passed based on the submissions made

by the learned counsel for the petitioners and the averments

[2024:RJ-JP:10893] (4 of 4) [CW-3193/2024]

made in the writ petition. The respondent/s would be at liberty to

examine the veracity of the submissions made in the writ petition

in the light of the observations made by the Division Bench of this

court in the case of Ramesh Chander Gupta (supra), and only

in case the averments made therein are found to be correct, the

petitioners be extended the relief as prayed with consequential

benefits as ordered in the case of Ramesh Chander Gupta

(supra), read with order dated 11. in SLP(C) No.

3420/2023 and order dated 19.05.2023 in SLP(C) No.

1011/2023 p by Hon'ble Apex Court, as has been

referred in the case of C.P. Mundinamani & Ors. (supra).

8. Since the main petition has been disposed of, the stay

application and the pending application/s, if any, also stand

disposed of.

(GANESH RAM MEENA),J

DIVYA SAINI /13

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter