Thursday, 14, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Surypal Singh S/O Shri Lahare Singh vs State Of Rajasthan (2024:Rj-Jp:6153)
2024 Latest Caselaw 940 Raj/2

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 940 Raj/2
Judgement Date : 6 February, 2024

Rajasthan High Court

Surypal Singh S/O Shri Lahare Singh vs State Of Rajasthan (2024:Rj-Jp:6153) on 6 February, 2024

Author: Sameer Jain

Bench: Sameer Jain

[2024:RJ-JP:6153]

        HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
                    BENCH AT JAIPUR

                    S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 19867/2023

1.       Surypal Singh S/o Shri Lahare Singh, Aged About 60
         Years, Resident Of 96, Gauri Shankar Colony, Near Saras
         Hotel, Bharatpur.
2.       Smt. Sohan Devi W/o Late Nawab Singh, Aged About 62
         Years, Resident Of B-16, Anirudh Nagar, Bharatpur.
                                                                       ----Petitioners
                                        Versus
1.       State Of Rajasthan, Through Additional Chief Secretary,
         Finance        Department,            Government            Of   Rajasthan,
         Secretariat, Jaipur.
2.       The Principal Secretary, Forest Department, Government
         Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur.
3.       The Director Pension Department, Rajasthan Government,
         Jyoti Nagar Jaipur.
                                                                     ----Respondents
For Petitioner(s)             :     Mr. Sandeep Saxena
For Respondent(s)             :     Mr. S.M. Sharma for
                                    Mr. Rajendra Soni, AAG



                HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN

                                         Order

06/02/2024

1. As per directions of this Court, advance copy of the petition

was supplied in the office of learned AAG Mr. Rajendra Soni, who

enters appearance on behalf of the respondents.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the issue

involved in the present matter is no more res integra in view of

judgment of Division Bench of this Court in the case of Ramesh

Chander Gupta vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. (D.B. Civil Writ

Petition No. 2800/2021; decided on 17.10.2023). It is

[2024:RJ-JP:6153] (2 of 3) [CW-19867/2023]

further submitted that in similar facts and circumstances, the

order of the Division Bench has also been followed by Co-ordinate

Bench in the case of Ramesh Chand vs. State of Rajasthan &

Ors. (S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 19121/2023; decided on

07.12.2023).

3. Learned counsel for the respondents does not dispute the

fact that the issue, as raised in the present writ petition, is similar

to Ramesh Chander Gupta (supra). However, it is contended

that the petitioners have approached the Court at a belated stage.

4. Heard and considered.

5. The fact that the issue involved is covered by Division Bench

of this Court in case of Ramesh Chander Gupta (supra)

remains undisputed. The contention that the petitioners have

approached the Court with a little delay is of no relevancy in the

facts and circumstances as matters of salary and pension have a

recurring cause of action, as was held by the Hon'ble Supreme

Court in Rushibhai Jagdishbhai Pathak vs. Bhavnagar

Municipal Corporation: 2022 (4) SLR 862 (SC).

6. In the case of Ramesh Chander Gupta (supra), Di-vision

Bench of this Court inter-alia while referring to orders passed in

Union of India & Ors. vs. Manohar Lal & Ors. (D.B. Civil Writ

Petition No.5445/2022; decided on 07.08.2023) & the

Commissioner, Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan & Anr. vs.

Ram Karan Bhakar & Ors. (D.B. Civil Writ Petition

No.4139/2022) as well as judgment of Hon'ble Supreme Court

in the case of The Director (Admn. and HR) KPTCL & Ors. vs.

C.P. Mundinamani & Ors.: 2023 SCC OnlineSC 401 has

passed the following directions:-

[2024:RJ-JP:6153] (3 of 3) [CW-19867/2023]

"It is also brought to the notice of this Court that Special Leave Petition (C) No.3420/2023 and Special Leave Petition (C) No.1001/2023 have also been dis- posed off on 19.05.2023. A copy of orders dated 11.04.2023 and 19.05.2023 passed by Hon'ble Supreme Court have also been placed on record.

Therefore, the present petitions are also disposed off on the same terms with direction to the respondents to consider the claim of the petitioners and pass ap- propriate orders and other consequential benefits as per their entitlement. Whatever amount is found payable be also released within a period of one month. Accordingly, the present petitions are dis-posed of."

7. In view of the joint statement of the learned counsel for the

parties, this Court deems it just and proper to dispose of this writ

petition on the same terms and with direction to the respondents

to consider the petitioners' claim and pass appropriate orders in

the light of the Division Bench judgment, as referred to above,

within a period of two months.

(SAMEER JAIN),J

ANIL SHARMA /551

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter