Monday, 11, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Banwari S/O Pratap vs State Of Rajasthan (2024:Rj-Jp:6128)
2024 Latest Caselaw 932 Raj/2

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 932 Raj/2
Judgement Date : 6 February, 2024

Rajasthan High Court

Banwari S/O Pratap vs State Of Rajasthan (2024:Rj-Jp:6128) on 6 February, 2024

Author: Praveer Bhatnagar

Bench: Praveer Bhatnagar

[2024:RJ-JP:6128]

         HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
                     BENCH AT JAIPUR

      S.B. Criminal Misc II Suspension Of Sentence Application
                                  No.130/2024
                                          IN
                    S.B. Criminal Appeal No.1078/2019

Banwari S/o Pratap, Aged About 40 Years, R/o Mothpur (Talawda)
Police Station Kotwali Baran District Baran (Presently Accused
/appellant Is In Jail Baran)
                                                                       ----Appellant
                                      Versus
State of Rajasthan, through Public Prosecutor

----Respondent

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. B.L. Dhakar For Respondent(s) : Mr. Imran Khan, PP

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR

Order

06/02/2024

The accused-appellant herein has been convicted and

sentenced vide judgment dated 11.04.2019 passed by the learned

Additional District & Sessions Judge No.2, Baran in Sessions Case

No.02/2019 (CIS No.55/2017) as under:-

Offence Under Imprisonment Fine Sentence in Section default of payment of fine 147/149 I.P.C. One year's S.I. Rs.1,000/- Fifteen days' S.I.

323/149 I.P.C. Six months' S.I. Rs.1,000/- Fifteen days' S.I.

308/149 I.P.C. Three years' S.I. Rs.3,000/- One month's S.I.

This criminal misc. second suspension of sentence

application is preferred against the order dated 01.04.2022,

[2024:RJ-JP:6128] (2 of 3) [SOSA-130/2024]

whereby, this Court forfeited the bail bonds of the accused-

appellant and directed to issue arrest warrant.

Learned counsel for the accused-appellant submits that

earlier vide order dated 04.07.2019, sentence of accused-

appellant was suspended and in pursuance of the said order,

accused-appellant was directed to present before this Court. He

also submits that due to unavoidable reasons, accused-appellant

could not mark his presence on due date. The accused-appellant is

in custody for almost three months, therefore, second suspension

of sentence application of accused-appellant may be allowed.

Learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the second

suspension of sentence application.

Considering the fact that accused-appellant is in custody for

almost three months and decision of the criminal appeal may take

considerable time and earlier sentence of accused-appellant was

suspended, I deem it proper to allow the second suspension of

sentence application of accused-appellant during pendency of the

instant appeal.

Accordingly, the second misc. application for suspension of

sentence filed under Section 389 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is

ordered that the sentences passed by the learned Additional

District & Sessions Judge No.2, Baran in Sessions Case No.02/2019

(CIS No.55/2017) vide judgment dated 11.04.2019 against the

appellant-applicant Banwari S/o Pratap, shall remain suspended

till final disposal of the aforesaid appeal and he shall be released

on bail, provided he executes a personal bond in the sum of

Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the

satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his appearance in this

[2024:RJ-JP:6128] (3 of 3) [SOSA-130/2024]

court on 11.03.2024 and whenever ordered to do so till the

disposal of the appeal on the conditions indicated below:-

1. That he/she/they will appear before the trial Court in the month of January of every year till the appeal is decided.

2. That if the applicant(s) change(s) the place of residence, he/she/they will give in writing his/her/their changed address to the trial Court as well as to the counsel in the High Court.

3. Similarly, if the sureties change their address, they will give in writing their changed address to the trial Court.

The learned trial Court shall keep the record of attendance of

the accused-applicant(s) in a separate file. Such file be registered

as Criminal Misc. Case related to original case in which the

accused-applicant(s) was/were tried and convicted. A copy of this

order shall also be placed in that file for ready reference. Criminal

Misc. file shall not be taken into account for statistical purpose

relating to pendency and disposal of cases in the trial court. In

case the said accused applicant(s) does not appear before the trial

court, the learned trial Judge shall report the matter to the High

Court for cancellation of bail.

(PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J

140-SURAJ KUMAR

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter