Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 816 Raj/2
Judgement Date : 2 February, 2024
[2024:RJ-JP:5795]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 6729/2019
Sanwarsingh S/o Late Shri Chhoturam B/c Jat, R/o Ward No.22,
Kalyawali, Srimadhopur, Police Station Srimadhopur, District
Sikar, Raj.
----Petitioner
Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp.
2. Omprakash S/o Bhinwaram, B/c Jat, R/o Ward No.22,
Kalyawali, Srimadhopur, Police Station Srimadhopur,
District Sikar, Raj.
3. Bhinwaram S/o Chhoturam, B/c Jat, R/o Ward No.22,
Kalyawali, Srimadhopur, Police Station Srimadhopur,
District Sikar, Raj.
4. Venuprasad @ Fallu S/o Shri Bhinwaram, B/c Jat, R/o
Ward No.22, Kalyawali, Srimadhopur, Police Station
Srimadhopur, District Sikar, Raj.
5. Suman Devi D/o Bhinwaram, B/c Jat, R/o Ward No.22,
Kalyawali, Srimadhopur, Police Station Srimadhopur,
District Sikar, Raj.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : None Present
For Respondent(s) : Mr. Babu Lal Nasuna, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN
Order
02/02/2024
1. By way of this instant misc. petition, the
petitioner/complainant has approached this Court with the
following reliefs:-
"It is therefore, most respectfully prayed that this criminal misc. petition may kindly be accepted and allowed and the order dated 28.08.2019 passed by Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, No.1, Srimadhopur, District Sikar in Criminal Case No.260A/2005 and order dated 11.10.2019
[2024:RJ-JP:5795] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-6729/2019]
passed by Additional Sessions Judge, Srimadhopur in Criminal Revision No.89/2019 may be quashed and set aside and application under Section 322 Cr.P.C. may kindly be allowed."
2. As per the letter dated 02.02.2024, sent by learned Senior
Civil Judge and Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, No.1, Shri
Madhopur, vide judgment dated 20.11.2019 passed by learned
Senior Civil Judge and Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, No.1,
Shri Madhopur, the accused/respondents - Om Prakash,
Bhinwaram, Venuprasad @ Fallu & Suman Devi have been
acquitted for the offences under Sections 143, 452/149, 341/149,
379/149 of IPC. The letter is taken on record.
3. Since, the Criminal Case No.260A/2005, in which the
impugned dated 28.08.2019 was passed, has already been
decided by the learned trial court, the prayer made in this misc.
petition does not survive. Thus, considering the aforesaid factual
position, this criminal misc. petition is dismissed as having
rendered infructuous.
(ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J
15-Nirmala
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!