Monday, 08, Jun, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Hetram Son Of Shri Kamal Singh Kachhwah vs State Of Rajasthan (2024:Rj-Jp:5349)
2024 Latest Caselaw 738 Raj/2

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 738 Raj/2
Judgement Date : 1 February, 2024

Rajasthan High Court

Hetram Son Of Shri Kamal Singh Kachhwah vs State Of Rajasthan (2024:Rj-Jp:5349) on 1 February, 2024

Author: Ganesh Ram Meena

Bench: Ganesh Ram Meena

[2024:RJ-JP:5349]

        HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
                    BENCH AT JAIPUR

                    S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.1484/2024

1.       Hetram Son Of Shri Kamal Singh Kachhwah, Aged About
         63 Years, Resident Of Village Kharera, Tehsil Uchhain,
         District Bharatpur (Raj.)
2.       Ashok Kumar Sharma Son Of Shri Laxmi Narayan
         Sharma, Resident Of Ward No. 22, Devi Ke Mandir Ke
         Pass, Jagdamba Colony, Kherli, Tehsil Kathumar, District
         Alwar (Raj.)
                                                                       ----Petitioners
                                        Versus
1.       State      Of    Rajasthan,          Through          Principal   Secretary,
         Department Of Education, Government Of Rajasthan,
         Secretariat, Jaipur.
2.       Principal Secretary, Department Of Finance, Government
         Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur.
3.       Director, Secondary Education, Bikaner.
4.       Director, Directorate Of Pension And Pensioners Welfare,
         Rajasthan, Jyoti Nagar, Jaipur.
5.       District Education Officer, Secondary Education, Bharatpur
         (Raj.)
6.       District Education Officer, Secondary Education, Alwar
         (Raj.)
7.       Government Upper Secondary School, Daroda, Kathumar,
         District Alwar.
8.       Headmaster,         Government            Secondary         School,   Soopa,
         District Bharatpur.
                                                                     ----Respondents

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Kailash Chand Katara, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rajendra Soni, Additional Advocate General

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA

Order

01/02/2024

[2024:RJ-JP:5349] (2 of 3) [CW-1484/2024]

1. Learned counsel for the parties submit that the issue

involved in the present writ petition has already been put to rest

by the Division Bench judgment of this Court in case of Ramesh

Chander Gupta vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. in D.B. Civil

Writ Petition No.2800/2021 and other connected matters,

decided on 17.10.2023.

2. In the case of Ramesh Chander Gupta (supra), Division

Bench of this Court inter-alia while referring to orders passed in

Union of India & Ors. vs. Manohar Lal & Ors.: D.B. Civil Writ

Petition No.5445/2022, decided on 07.08.2023 & the

Commissioner, Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan & Anr. vs. Ram

Karan Bhakar & Ors.: D.B. Civil Writ Petition No.4139/2022 as well

as judgment of Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of The Director

(Admn. and HR) KPTCL & Ors. vs. C.P. Mundinamani & Ors.: 2023

SCC online SC 401 has passed the following directions:-

"It is also brought to the notice of this Court that Special Leave Petition (C) No.3420/2023 and Special Leave Petition (C) No.1001/2023 have also been disposed off on 19.05.2023. A copy of orders dated 11.04.2023 and 19.05.2023 passed by Hon'ble Supreme Court have also been placed on record. Therefore, the present petitions are also disposed off on the same terms with direction to the respondents to consider the claim of the petitioners and pass appropriate orders and other consequential benefits as per their entitlement. Whatever amount is found payable be also released within a period of one month. Accordingly, the present petitions are disposed of."

3. Learned AAG appearing for the respondents does not dispute

the fact that the issue, as raised in the present writ petition is

similar to Ramesh Chander Gupta (supra).

4. In view of the joint statement of the learned counsel for the

parties, this Court deems it just and proper to dispose of this writ

[2024:RJ-JP:5349] (3 of 3) [CW-1484/2024]

petition on the same terms and with direction to the respondents

to consider the petitioners' claim and pass appropriate orders in

the light of the Division Bench judgment, as referred to above,

within a period of two months.

5. Since the main petition has been disposed of, the stay

application and pending application/s, if any, also stand disposed

of.

(GANESH RAM MEENA),J

Karan/37

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter