Monday, 08, Jun, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Ram Singh vs State Of Rajasthan (2024:Rj-Jd:9285)
2024 Latest Caselaw 1777 Raj

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 1777 Raj
Judgement Date : 22 February, 2024

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur

Ram Singh vs State Of Rajasthan (2024:Rj-Jd:9285) on 22 February, 2024

Author: Farjand Ali

Bench: Farjand Ali

[2024:RJ-JD:9285]

          HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
                           JODHPUR
     S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 10371/2023

Ram Singh S/o Shri Samuji, Aged About 47 Years, R/o 358,
Dhanol Road, Near Nadi, Dhamsin, District Jalore, Rajasthan.
                                                                      ----Petitioner
                                       Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through PP
                                                                    ----Respondent


For Petitioner(s)            :     Mr. S.S. Rathore
For Respondent(s)            :     Mr. S.K. Bishnoi, PP



                 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FARJAND ALI

Order

22/02/2024

1. The jurisdiction of this Court has been invoked by way of filing

an application under Section 438 CrPC at the instance of

accused- petitioner. The requisite details of the matter are

tabulated herein below:

S.No.                              Particulars of the Case

     2.    Concerned Police Station              Goverdhan Vilas
     3.    District                              Udaipur
     4.    Offences alleged in the FIR           Sections 384, 419, 420 and 120-B
                                                 of the IPC as well as Section 66-D
                                                 of he IT Act
     5.    Offences added, if any                --
     6.    Date   of    passing              of 01.06.2023
           impugned order


2. Having apprehension of being arrested in the afore-mentioned

matter, the petitioner has prayed for anticipatory bail on the

ground that no case for the alleged offences is made out

against him and his incarceration is not warranted. There are

[2024:RJ-JD:9285] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-10371/2023]

no factors at play in the case at hand that may work against

grant of anticipatory bail to the accused- petitioner and he has

been made an accused based on conjectures and surmises.

3. Contrary to the submissions of learned counsel for the

petitioner, learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail

application and submitted that the present case is not fit for

grant of anticipatory bail.

4. I have considered the submissions made by both the parties

and have perused the material available on record. The

offences involved in case are triable by a Court of Magistrate,

for which the provisions contained under Section 41 and 41-A

of the CrPC are applicable mutatis mutandis and the judgment

rendered by Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Arnesh

Kumar v. State of Bihar [AIR 2014 SC 2756] applies

squarely in the present case, where custodial investigation

would not be required.

5. An interim order was passed in favour of the petitioner on

16.10.2023 restraining his arrest in the present case, where-

after around four months have lapsed and the petitioner is

enjoying the said protection since then and he has not

misused the liberty during this prolonged period as no report

in this regard has been received by this Court. The matter is

pending before this Court since 14.08.2023. Thus, in light of

the judgment rendered by Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case

of Abhishek Kumar Vs. State of Dehli (Criminal Appeal

No.360/2022) reported in 2022/INSC/275, and consider-

ing the over all facts and circumstances of the case, it is

[2024:RJ-JD:9285] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-10371/2023]

deemed suitable to grant the benefit of anticipatory bail to the

petitioner in the present matter.

6. Accordingly, the instant bail application under Section 438

Cr.P.C. is allowed. The S.H.O/I.O/Arresting Officer of the

concerned Police Station is directed that in the event of arrest

of the petitioner in connection with the FIR, details of which

have been given in tabular form above, he shall be released

on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of

Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each

to the satisfaction of the S.H.O/I.O/Arresting Officer of the

concerned Police Station on the following conditions:-

(i) that the petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation by a police offi- cer as and when required;

(ii) that the petitioner shall not directly or in-

directly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or any police officer, and

(iii) that the petitioner shall not leave India with-

out previous permission of the court.

(FARJAND ALI),J 148-Ashutosh/-

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter