Monday, 08, Jun, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Mukesh Swami vs State Of Rajasthan (2024:Rj-Jd:8583)
2024 Latest Caselaw 1661 Raj

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 1661 Raj
Judgement Date : 19 February, 2024

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur

Mukesh Swami vs State Of Rajasthan (2024:Rj-Jd:8583) on 19 February, 2024

Author: Farjand Ali

Bench: Farjand Ali

[2024:RJ-JD:8583]

      HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
                       JODHPUR
                    S.B. Criminal Misc(Pet.) No. 525/2023

Mukesh Swami S/o Bhanwarlal Swami, Aged About 38 Years, R/o
Ward No. 26, Suratgarh, Sri Ganganagar.
                                                                       ----Petitioner
                                       Versus
1.       State Of Rajasthan, Through PP
2.       Kaluram S/o Khayali Ram, R/o Ward No. 27, Suratgarh,
         Distt. Sri Ganganagar.
                                                                    ----Respondents


For Petitioner(s)            :     Mr. Shreekant Verma
For Respondent(s)            :     Mr. Abhishek Purohit, AGA



                HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FARJAND ALI

Order

19/02/2024

1. The instant criminal misc. petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C.

has been preferred by the petitioner for quashing of FIR

No.7/2023, Police Station Suratgarh, District Ganganagar for

the offences under Sections 332, 353 and 504 of the IPC.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner prays for quashing and

setting aside the aforementioned FIR and all further

proceedings in pursuant thereof.

3. Per contra, learned public prosecutor opposes the submission

of learned counsel for the petitioner for quashing of the FIR

and all further proceedings in pursuant thereof.

4. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Public

Prosecutor.

5. Looking to the allegations leveled in the FIR, I am not

inclined to quash the FIR, however, looking to the fact that

[2024:RJ-JD:8583] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-525/2023]

the offences invoked in this case are triable by Magistrate

and the provisions contained in Section 41 Cr.P.C. as well as

the judgment passed by Hon'ble Apex Court in Arnesh

Kumar vs. State of Bihar : AIR 2014 SC 2756 squarely

applies, the Investigating Officer shall adhere to the

aforesaid legal situation and shall not affect the arrest

during investigation, instead thereof, he shall be given 15

days' prior notice so that he may exercise his legitimate

rights.

6. Accordingly, the instant criminal misc. Petition as well as the

stay petition stand disposed.

(FARJAND ALI),J

649-Ashutosh/-

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter