Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 1563 Raj
Judgement Date : 15 February, 2024
[2024:RJ-JD:8105]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 5325/2017
Bhanwar Singh Shekhawat S/o Kalyan Singh Shekhawat, Worked On The Post Helper Department Of Public Helath And Engineer Superannuated From Sub-Division Jahazpur, Circle-Bhilwara At Present Residing At D-6, Sayta Nagar, Jhotwara, Jaipur Raj.
----Petitioner Versus
1. The State Of Rajasthan Through The Secretary, Department Of Public Health And Engineer, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur.
2. The Chief Engineer, Department Of Public Health And Engineer, Jaipur.
3. The Additional Chief Engineer, Department Of Public Health And Engineer, Ajmer.
4. The Superintendent Engineer, Department Of Public Health And Engineer, Circle-Bhilwara, Bhilwara.
5. The Assistant Engineer, Department Of Public Health And Engineer, Sub-Division-Jahazpur, District Bhilwara.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rajendra Singh Rathore
For Respondent(s) : Ms. Anjana Jawa
JUSTICE DINESH MEHTA
Order
15/02/2024
1. After arguing some time, Mr. Rathore learned counsel for the
petitioner submits that the petitioner would be satisfied if a
direction is issued to the competent authority of respondents to
consider and decide petitioner's representation in the light of
judgment dated 15.09.2016 rendered in the case of Surendra
[2024:RJ-JD:8105] (2 of 2) [CW-5325/2017]
Singh vs State of Rajasthan and another in S.B. Civil Writ
Petition No.7638/2008.
2. In view of the aforesaid, the present writ petition is disposed
of with a direction to the petitioner to file a representation, along
with a photo-stat copy of the judgment in the case of Surendra
Singh (supra) and the order instant, within a period of four weeks.
3. In case, a representation is so addressed within the aforesaid
period, the competent authority shall consider and decide the
same in accordance with law, preferably within a period of eight
weeks from the date of receipt of the representation.
4. It is made clear that aforesaid direction to decide the
representation has been issued only with a view to ensure
expeditious redressal of petitioner's grievance. The same may not
be construed to be an order to decide the representation in a
particular manner.
(DINESH MEHTA),J 172-raksha/-
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!