Monday, 08, Jun, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Suraj S/O Shri Kishanlal vs The State Of Rajasthan ...
2024 Latest Caselaw 2750 Raj/2

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 2750 Raj/2
Judgement Date : 9 April, 2024

Rajasthan High Court

Suraj S/O Shri Kishanlal vs The State Of Rajasthan ... on 9 April, 2024

Author: Uma Shanker Vyas

Bench: Uma Shanker Vyas

[2024:RJ-JP:17189]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
            BENCH AT JAIPUR

   S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No.
                            3193/2024

Hemraj @ Manraj S/o Shyoji @ Mulya, Aged About
21 Years, R/o Borkhandi, Tehsil Peeplu, District
Tonk. (At Present Confined In District Jail Tonk)
                                                         ----Petitioner
                                Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through PP
                                                     ----Respondent

Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No.

Suraj S/o Shri Kishanlal, Aged About 24 Years, R/o Chota Moja, Jhirana, Police Station Jhirana, District Tonk (Rajasthan). (Accused Is Presently Confined In Central Jail, Jaipur).

----Petitioner Versus The State Of Rajasthan, Through PP

----Respondent

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Devanshu Sharma, Adv.

Mr. Dilip Singh Bagdoliya, Adv.

For                      : Mr. M.K. Sheoran, P.P.
Respondent(s)


HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS Judgment / Order

09/04/2024

These bail applications have been filed by the

petitioners under Section 439 Cr.P.C. seeking regular

[2024:RJ-JP:17189] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-3193/2024]

bail in FIR No.7/2024 registered at Police Station

Mehandwas, District Tonk for the offence(s) under

Section(s) 457, 380, 427 & 511 of IPC.

Learned counsels for the petitioners submit that

the accused-petitioners are innocent and they have

been falsely implicated in these cases. They further

submit that the accused-petitioners have been in

judicial custody since long and the conclusion of the

trial will take long time, hence the petitioners may be

enlarged on bail.

Learned Public Prosecutor appearing for the

State has opposed these bail applications.

Taking into consideration the overall facts and

circumstances of these cases, but without expressing

any opinion on the merits and demerits of these

cases, this Court deems it just and proper to enlarge

the petitioners on bail.

Accordingly, the bail applications filed under

Section 439 Cr.P.C. are allowed and it is ordered that

accused-petitioners namely (1) Hemraj @ Manraj

S/o Shyoji @ Mulya and (2) Suraj S/o Shri

Kishanlal shall be released on bail, provided each of

them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of

Rs.1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each

to the satisfaction of the trial Court, with the

[2024:RJ-JP:17189] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-3193/2024]

stipulation that the petitioners shall appear before

that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing and as

and when called upon to do so.

A copy of this order be placed in the connected

file.

(UMA SHANKER VYAS),J

YOGESH KUMAR /105-106

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter