Monday, 08, Jun, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Anita Gurjar D/O Madhu Lal Gurjar vs State Of Rajasthan (2024:Rj-Jp:17223)
2024 Latest Caselaw 2738 Raj/2

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 2738 Raj/2
Judgement Date : 9 April, 2024

Rajasthan High Court

Anita Gurjar D/O Madhu Lal Gurjar vs State Of Rajasthan (2024:Rj-Jp:17223) on 9 April, 2024

Author: Anil Kumar Upman

Bench: Anil Kumar Upman

[2024:RJ-JP:17223]

        HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
                    BENCH AT JAIPUR

                 S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 296/2024

1.       Anita Gurjar D/o Madhu Lal Gurjar, Aged About 23 Years,
         R/o Beawar Road, Vikas Nagar, Kekri, Ajmer 305404.
         (Residing At Beawar Road, Vikas Nagar, Kekri, Ajmer
         305404)
2.       Surendra Gurjar S/o Pokhar Gurjar, Aged About 23 Years,
         5, Parwati Nagar, Janpath Road, District Jaipur. (Residing
         At Beawar Road, Vikas Nagar, Kekri, Ajmer 305404)
                                                                     ----Petitioners
                                      Versus
1.       State Of Rajasthan, Through PP
2.       The Director General Of Police, Jaipur, Rajasthan.
3.       Supertendent Of Police, District Kekri
4.       Station House Officer, Police Station Kekri City, District
         Kekri
5.       Namita Modak S/o Sukumar Modak, Aged About 25 Years,
         R/o Plot No. 8, Parvati Nagar, Janpath Road, Shyamnagar,
         Jaipur.
                                                                   ----Respondents
For Petitioner(s)           :     Mr. Pradeep Sharma
For Respondent(s)           :     Mr. Yashwant Khankhadia, PP



           HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN

                                       Order

09/04/2024

1. Petitioners have preferred instant petition for issuance of

necessary directions to official-respondents to provide adequate

security and protection to them on the ground that they are facing

grave threat of their life and liberty at the hands of private

respondents.

[2024:RJ-JP:17223] (2 of 3) [CRLW-296/2024]

2. Counsel for petitioners submits that petitioners in order to

live happily and peacefully are seeking protection qua private

respondents, who are not happy with the relationship of

petitioners.

3. Pursuant the judgment of the Apex Court in case of Navtej

Singh Johar V. Union of India [(2018)10 SCC 1] and of this

court in Bajrang Lal Sharma v. State of Rajasthan, SB Cr.

Miscellaneous Petition No.2/2019 decided on 4-1-2019, the

State Government through Director General of Police issued a

Circular dated 18-1-2019 and appointed Nodal Officer at every

Police Station in the State of Rajasthan for ventilation of

grievances of newly married couple, including for adequate

protection. Life and liberty is fundamental right of every citizen

being part of Article 21 of the Constitution of India, petitioners

deserve protection of their life and liberty in accordance with law.

4. Similar to the married couple, petitioners, who are major and

willingly living in relationship, without entering into marriage, also

cannot be denied protection of their life and liberty since it is

fundamental right of every citizen being part of Article 21 of the

Constitution of India as has been observed by this Apex Court in

case of S.Khushboo Vs. Kanniammal [(2010)5 SCC 600] and

Joseph Shine Vs. Union of India [(2019)3 SCC 39]. Thus,

petitioners deserve protection of their life and liberty in

accordance with law.

5. In view of above, however, this Court in exercise of its writ

jurisdiction is not inclined to enter into examining the validity of

[2024:RJ-JP:17223] (3 of 3) [CRLW-296/2024]

marriage/legality of relationship of parties, therefore does not

render any affirmation of legality and validity of the status of

parties, under which they are living together, but keeping in mind

the proposition of law set forth by the Apex Court in catena of

judgments and in order to protect fundamental rights of parties

for their life and liberty, guaranteed under the Constitution, this

petition is disposed of with liberty to petitioners to approach the

concerned Nodal Officer for ventilation of their grievances.

6. In case petitioners move any application, it is expected from

the concerned Nodal Officer to take necessary action for not

allowing to illegally hinder in peaceful life and liberty of petitioners

by private respondents, who are not agreeable to the relationship

of petitioners, but after verifying the fact, if required.

7. However, it is made clear that this order will not affect the

civil/ criminal proceedings, if any, in the present matter.

8. All pending application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed of.

(ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J

GAUTAM JAIN /659

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter