Saturday, 02, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Guddi Devi vs State Of Rajasthan ...
2023 Latest Caselaw 7775 Raj

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 7775 Raj
Judgement Date : 3 October, 2023

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur
Guddi Devi vs State Of Rajasthan ... on 3 October, 2023
Bench: Vijay Bishnoi, Yogendra Kumar Purohit

[2023:RJ-JD:32408-DB]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR D.B. Special Appeal Writ No. 795/2023 Guddi Devi W/o Hetram, Aged About 52 Years, By Caste Bishnoi, R/o Ward No.15, Roda, Rora, Tehsil Nokha, District Bikaner.

----Appellant Versus

1. State of Rajasthan, through Joint Secretary, Department of Mines, Government of Rajasthan, Jaipur.

2. District Collector, Bikaner.

3. Mokhram S/o Bhallu Ram, R/o Ward No.4, Jaisingh Desar Magra, Tehsil Nokha, District Bikaner.

4. Mining Engineer, Mining Engineer, Mines and Geology Department, Bikaner, Rajasthan.

5. Superintending Mining Engineer, Mines and Geology Department, C-64, Sardulganj, Bikaner.

6. Dharma Chand S/o Goverdhan Ram, B/c Bishnoi, R/o Ward No.4, Jaisingh Desar Magra, Tehsil Nokha, District Bikaner.

7. Tehsildar, Tehsil Nokha, District Bikaner.

8. Gomti D/o Bhulla Ram, B/c Bishnoi, R/o Ward No.15, Roda, Rora, Tehsil Nokha, District Bikaner.

9. Madan Lal S/o Bhulla Ram, B/c Bishnoi, R/o Ward No.4, Jaisingh Desar Magra, Tehsil Nokha, District Bikaner.

10. Rameshwar Lal S/o Bhulla Ram, R/o Ward No. 4, Jaisingh Desar Magra, Tehsil Nokha, District Bikaner.

11. Shaktu W/o Bhulla Ram, R/o Ward No.4, Jaisingh Desar Magra, Tehsil Nokha, District Bikaner.

----Respondents

For Appellant(s) : Mr. Aman Bishnoi Bola

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAY BISHNOI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YOGENDRA KUMAR PUROHIT

Judgment

03/10/2023

1. This intra court appeal has been filed on behalf of the

appellant being aggrieved with the order dated 18.09.2023 passed

by the learned Single Judge in S.B. Civil Writ Petition

No.13518/2023.

[2023:RJ-JD:32408-DB] (2 of 3) [SAW-795/2023]

2. Vide impugned order dated 18.09.2023, the learned Single

Judge disposed of two writ petitions i.e. S.B. Civil Writ Petition

No.12927/2023, filed on behalf of the respondent No.6, and S.B.

Civil Writ Petition No.13518/2023, filed on behalf of the appellant.

3. While disposing of both the writ petitions, the learned Single

Judge directed the Tehsildar, Nokha, District Bikaner to make fresh

demarcation in the presence of both the parties within a period of

seven days from today, after such demarcation is made, the

respondent No.6-Dharma Chand Bishnoi will be free to operate his

lease, strictly in accordance with law and the land of

appellant-Guddi Devi so demarcated shall be protected

accordingly by the respondents.

4. Learned counsel for the appellant has submitted that

pursuant to the said order, fresh demarcation proceedings has

already been completed and as per the same, the respondent

No.6 was found operating his mining lease in the land belonging to

the appellant. It is further submitted that now the respondent

No.6 has already vacated the land of the appellant.

5. Learned counsel for the appellant has submitted that the

respondent No.6 now carrying out mining operation in Khasara

Nos.543 and 544 without obtaining necessary permission. It is

also submitted that the mining lease issued in favour of the

respondent No.6 is illegal and liable to be quashed and set aside.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the appellant, we are of the

view that once the directions given by the learned Single Judge

has been carried out no case for interference is made out.

[2023:RJ-JD:32408-DB] (3 of 3) [SAW-795/2023]

7. However, if the appellant is aggrieved by the action of the

respondent No.6 of carrying out mining operation in Khasara

Nos.543 and 544 without obtaining necessary permission etc, he

is free to approach mining authorities under the provisions of

relevant Act and Rules.

8. It is further observed that if the appellant is aggrieved by

issuance of mining lease in favour of the respondent No.6, she is

free to avail appropriate remedy available to her to challenge the

said mining lease under the provisions of relevant Act and Rules.

9. With these observations, this special appeal writ is disposed

of.

(YOGENDRA KUMAR PUROHIT),J (VIJAY BISHNOI),J

Abhishek Kumar S.No.33

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter