Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 9944 Raj
Judgement Date : 21 November, 2023
[2023:RJ-JD:39918]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 84/2021
Chandra Shekhar Batra S/o Shri Ramesh Chandra Batra, Aged
About 44 Years, C/69-70, R.k. Puram, Jaipur Road, Bikaner.
(Presently Lodged At Central Jail, Bikaner).
----Petitioner
Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p.
2. Shri Shiv Ratan Soni S/o Shri Ram Lal Soni, D-30, Shastri
Nagar, Bikaner.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. C.S. Kotwani
Ms. Swati Shekhar
For Respondent(s) : Mr. S.S. Rajpurohit, PP
Mr. Bharat Singh, for respondent No.2
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR GARG
Order
21/11/2023
This revision petition has been filed against the judgment
dated 23.01.2020 passed by the learned Addl. Sessions Judge
No.3, Bikaner, whereby the appeal of the petitioner has been
dismissed and the judgment dated 12.12.2018 passed by the
learned Special Judicial Magistrate (NI Act Cases) No.1, Bikaner
for offence under Section 138 N.I. Act has been affirmed and the
petitioner sentenced to undergo one year's simple imprisonment
along with fine in the sum of Rs.2,85,000/- in default of payment,
he shall further undergo four months' simple imprisonment.
Counsel for the petitioner submits that during the pendency
of the revision petition, the petitioner and complainant-respondent
No.2 have entered into a compromise in the spirit of Lok Adalat
and the respondent No.2 has received all the amount from the
[2023:RJ-JD:39918] (2 of 3) [CRLR-84/2021]
petitioner and does not want to proceed in the matter. It is stated
that since the parties have entered into compromise and amicably
settled their dispute, therefore, the sentence of imprisonment
awarded to the petitioner may be set aside.
Counsel for the respondent No.2 concurs the fact of
compromise arrived at between the parties.
Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case,
since the parties have settled the dispute and complainant
respondent No.2 has accepted the sum towards full and final
settlement of dispute on the satisfaction of the complainant and in
the light of provisions of Section 147 of NI Act and in view of law
laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Damodar S.
Prabhu Vs. Sayed Babalal H. reported in 2010 (5) SCC 663, the
sentence awarded to the petitioner for offence under Section 138
NI Act is liable to be set aside. However, since the compromise has
been arrived at after rejection of the appeal preferred by the
petitioner, a cost of 15% of the cheque amount deserves to be
imposed upon the petitioner in the light of the decision rendered
by the Hon'ble Apex court in the case of Damodar S. Prabhu
(Supra).
Accordingly, the conviction and sentence of imprisonment
awarded to the petitioner for offence under Section 138 NI Act
vide judgment dated 12.12.2018 and 23.01.2020 are hereby set
aside on the basis of the aforesaid compromise subject to
deposition of cost of 15% of the cheque amount. The cost shall be
deposited by the petitioner with the Rajasthan State Legal
Services Authority, Jodhpur within a period of one month from
today. In case the cost is not deposited by the petitioner within
[2023:RJ-JD:39918] (3 of 3) [CRLR-84/2021]
the stipulated period, the revision petition may be listed before
this Court for passing appropriate orders.
The revision petition is disposed of accordingly.
A copy of this order be sent to the office of Legal Services
Authority at Jodhpur.
(MANOJ KUMAR GARG),J 107-Ishan/-
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!