Sita Dhholi vs State Of Rajasthan ...
2023 Latest Caselaw 9779 Raj

[2023:RJ-JD:39251] (1 of 38) [CW-14080/2023]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 14080/2023

Rajendra Kumar Beniwal S/o Shri Shriram Beniwal, Aged About 31 Years, R/o Vpo Khidagi, Tehsil Niwai, District Tonk (Raj.).

----Petitioner Versus

1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Principal Secretary, Medical And Health Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur.

2. The Director, State Health And Family Welfare Institution, Rajasthan, Jaipur.

3. The Director (Non-Gazetted), Medical And Health Services, Rajasthan, Tilak Marg, Swasthya Bhawan, Jaipur.

----Respondents Connected With S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 14083/2023

1. Manohar Lal S/o Arjun Ram, Aged About 28 Years, Village Boha, Post Dewa, Tehsil And District Jaisalmer.

2. Rajesh Kumar Sharma S/o Gouri Shankar Sharma, Aged About 40 Years, Near Railway Station Prem Nagar, Ward No.24, Tehsil Pokaran, District Jaisalmer.

3. Dineshk Umar Garg S/o Bhagirath Garg, Aged About 34 Years, Rasla, Tehsil Fatehgarh, District Jaisalmer.

4. Anil Kumar S/o Heera Ram, Aged About 33 Years, Bishnoiyo Ka Bas Khetol, Khetolai Pokaran, District Jaisalmer.

5. Sumit Dave S/o Jai Kishan Dave, Aged About 31 Years, Bohro Ki Gali, Tehsil Pokaran, District Jaisalmer.

6. Kailash Chand Gurjar S/o Mewa Ram Gurjar, Aged About 37 Years, Village Talibpura, Post Palda, Tehsil And District Tonk.

7. Geeta Kumawat D/o Nemi Chand Kumawat W/o Mahesh Kumar, Aged About 33 Years, 154, Green Park Vistar, Benar Road, Dadi Ka Phatak, Jhotwara, District Jaipur.

8. Raju Ram S/o Pokar Ram, Aged About 34 Years, Village Dabri, Post Lunar, Tehsil And District Jaisalmer.

9. Mohit Sharma S/o Tara Chand Sharma, Aged About 29 Years, Bahadarpur Road, Gurjar Mohalla, Tehsil Ramgarh, District Alwar.

10. Roshan Lal Sharma S/o Ghanshyam Sharma, Aged About 26 Years, Shiv Colony, Village Post Nayla, Tehsil Jamwaramgarh, District Jaipur.

11. Kuldeep Jain S/o Naresh Jain, Aged About 25 Years, Village Mangrol, Post Mangrol, Tehsil Mania, District Dhaulpur.

12. Vipin Kumar Jha S/o Rakesh Kumar Jha, Aged About 26 Years, Ward No.08, Kuriyan Gali, Tehsil Rajakhera, District Dhaulpur.

[2023:RJ-JD:39251] (2 of 38) [CW-14080/2023]

13. Nitu Kumari D/o Gurudayal W/o Rajesh Kumar, Aged About 32 Years, Sanwal Ka Ki Dhani, Gudha Gorji, Tehsil Udaipurwati, District Jhunjhunu.

14. Om Prakash S/o Mangi Lal, Aged About 27 Years, 51, Khali Ki Taraf, Bali, Village Bali, Post Donda, Tehsil Jhalarapatan, District Jhalawar.

15. Gaphoor Khan S/o Sachchoo Khan, Aged About 39 Years, Village Post Chelak, Tehsil Fatehgarh, District Jaisalmer.

16. Ashutosh Ojha S/o Harivallabh Ojha, Aged About 31 Years, Mali Para, Tehsil And District Jaisalmer.

17. Navdeep Singh S/o Madan Mohan, Aged About 33 Years, Vpo Mahmadpur, Tehsil Todabhim, Dsitrict Karauli.

18. Govind Ram S/o Mana Ram, Aged About 33 Years, Meghwalo Ka Vas, Chandhan, District Jaisalmer.

19. Rajendra Kumar Verma S/o Chhitar Lal Verma, Aged About 41 Years, Near Office Club, Civil Lines Nayapura, Tehsil Ladpura, District Kota.

20. Sunil Kumar Yadav S/o Vijay Kumar Yadav, Aged About 31 Years, Vpo Shahjahapur, Tehsil Neemrana, District Alwar.

21. Dinesh Bhati S/o Bilaki Das Bhati, Aged About 35 Years, Choudhariyon Ki Gali, Ward No.12, Pokaran, District Jaisalmer.

22. Piyush Kumar Kulsharist S/o Ram Niwash Verma, Aged About 27 Years, House No.17, Gokul Colony, Borkhera, Tehsil Ladpura, District Kota.

23. Anil Kumar S/o Janki Lal Meghwal, Aged About 35 Years, Janki Lal Meghwal, 2 Kundanpur Road, Ward No.8, Tehsil Sangod, District Kota.

24. Pankesh Kumar Meena S/o Hukam Chand Meena, Aged About 36 Years, Village Kherda, Post Karwad, Tehsil Pipalda, District Kota.

----Petitioners Versus

1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Principal Secretary, Medical And Health Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur.

2. The Director, State Health And Family Welfare Institution, Rajasthan, Jaipur.

3. The Director (Non-Gazetted), Medical And Health Services, Rajasthan, Tilak Marg, Swasthya Bhawan, Jaipur.

----Respondents

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 14084/2023

1. Ravi Kumar Jeengar S/o Shri Om Prakash Jeengar, Aged About 31 Years, R/o Radhe Krishn Vihar, Ward No. 9, Gangapur, Tehsil Sahada, District Bhilwara.

2. Ramniwas Sharma S/o Shri Asharam Sharma, Aged About 31 Years, R/o Village Kalichhat, Kanwas, Tehsil

[2023:RJ-JD:39251] (3 of 38) [CW-14080/2023]

Asind, District Bhilwara.

3. Shankar Lal Mali S/o Shri Ladu Lal Mali, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Atoon, Via Pur, Tehsil And District Bhilwara.

4. Surender Singh Rawat S/o Mohan Singh Rawat, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Village Bijwad Ka Badiya, Tehsil Karera, District Bhilwara.

----Petitioners Versus

1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Principal Secretary, Medical And Health Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur.

2. The Director, State Health And Family Welfare Institution, Rajasthan, Jaipur.

3. The Director (Non-Gazetted), Medical And Health Services, Rajasthan, Tilak Marg, Swasthya Bhawan, Jaipur.

----Respondents

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 14099/2023

Babulal Choudhary S/o Shri Kanhaiyalal Choudhary, Aged About 38 Years, Resident Of Primary Health Centre, Putholi, Gangrar, District Chittorgarh.

----Petitioner Versus

1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary, Medical And Health (Group-Iii) Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariate, Jaipur.

2. Director, State Institute Of Health And Family Welfare, Rajasthan, Jaipur.

3. Chief Medical And Health Officer, Chittorgarh, District Chittorgarh.

----Respondents

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 14841/2023

Asha Kumari D/o Gopi Lal W/o Mahendra Kumar, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Village Mediya Dungawas, Post Chhapli, Tehsil Bhim, District Rajsamand, Rajasthan.

----Petitioner Versus

1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Principal Secretary Medical And Health Department, Secretariat, Jaipur.

2. The Director, State Health And Family Welfare Institution, Jaipur.

3. The Director (Non-Gazette), Medical And Health Services, Rajasthan, Jaipur.

4. The Joint Director, Medical And Health Services, Udaipur Zone, Udaipur.

5. The Chief Medical And Health Officer, Rajsamand.

[2023:RJ-JD:39251] (4 of 38) [CW-14080/2023]

6. The Block Chief Medical And Health Officer, Block Bhim, District Rajsamand.

----Respondents

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 14434/2023 Sita Dhholi D/o Mangi Lal Dhholi, W/o Bhupesh Verma, Aged About 33 Years, R/o 692, Karoi Kalan, Suwana, District Bhilwara, Rajasthan.

----Petitioner Versus

1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Principal Secretary Medical And Health Department, Secretariat, Jaipur.

2. The Director, State Health And Family Welfare Institution, Jaipur.

3. The Director (Non Gazette), Medical And Health Services, Rajasthan, Jaipur.

4. The Joint Director, Medical And Health Services, Bharatpur Zone, Bharatpur.

5. The Chief Medical And Health Officer, Rajsamand.

6. The Block Chief Medical And Health Officer, Block Railmagra, District Rajsamand.

----Respondents

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 15038/2023

Rekha Garg D/o Shri Mohan Lal, Aged About 33 Years, Resident Of Rebariyo Ka Waas, Nimbeshwar, Mawri Tehsil - Siwana, District - Barmer (Rajasthan).

----Petitioner Versus

1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary, Department Of Medical And Health Services, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur (Rajasthan).

2. The Director, Health And Family Welfare Institute, Rajasthan, Jaipur.

----Respondents

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 17001/2023

Jyoti Devi Bunkar W/o Vikarm Singh, Aged About 35 Years, Bunkar, R/o Village Lisariya, Tehsil Shrimadhopur, District Sikar.

----Petitioner Versus

1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary, Medical Health And Family Welfare Department, Secretariat, Jaipur, Rajasthan

2. The Director, Medical Health And Family Welfare Department, Secretariat, Jaipur, Rajasthan.

3. Prinicipal And Controller, Sardar Patel Medical College, Bikaner, Rajasthan.

[2023:RJ-JD:39251] (5 of 38) [CW-14080/2023]

4. The Secretary, Rajasthan Medical Relief Society, P.b.m.

Hospital, Bikaner.

5. Chief Medical And Health Officer, Bikaner.

----Respondents

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 17073/2023

1. Ritik Shrimali S/o Purushotam Shrimali, Aged About 24 Years, R/o Mukam Post Kariyana, Tehsil Sagwara, District Dungarpur, Rajasthan.

2. Dharmendra Pal Singh Ahada S/o Devendra Singh Ahada, Aged About 22 Years, R/o Mukam Dadodiya, Post Chela Kherwara, District Dungarpur, Rajasthan.

----Petitioners Versus

1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Additional Chief Secretary, Medical And Health Department (G-3), Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur.

2. The Joint Secretary, Medical And Health Department (G-

3), Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur.

3. The Director (Non-Gazette), Medical And Health Services, Rajasthan, Jaipur.

4. The Director, State Institute Of Health And Family Welfare (Sihfw) Rajasthan, Jaipur.

----Respondents

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 17374/2023

Praveen Kumar Meena S/o Shri Gopal Lal Meena, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Village And Post Jalindri, Tehsil Bijoliya District Bhilwara (Raj.)

----Petitioner Versus

1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Director, State Institute Of Health And Family Welfare, Jhalana Institutional Area, Jaipur.

2. Rajasthan Nursing Council, B-39, Sardar Patel Marg, C-

Scheme Jaipur (Raj.) Through Its President.

----Respondents

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 17379/2023

Rahul S/o Sh. Koja Ram, Aged About 23 Years, Jajiwal Bhandariya, Jajiwal Kalan, District Jodhpur (Raj.) 342027

----Petitioner Versus

1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Secretary, Department Of Medical Health And Family Welfare, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur.

2. Chief Medical And Health Officer, Office Of Chief Medical

[2023:RJ-JD:39251] (6 of 38) [CW-14080/2023]

And Health Officer, Jodhpur.

----Respondents

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 17461/2023

1. Shanti Bawal D/o Moola Ram Bawal, Aged About 42 Years, Resident Of Meghwalo Ka Bas, Village Ghenari, Tehsil Rani, District Pali (Raj.).

2. Mamta D/o Bhanwar Lal, Aged About 37 Years, Resident Of Meghwalo Ka Bas, V/p Boosi, Tehsil Ran, District Pali (Raj.).

3. Shabiyan Bano D/o Inayth Husen, Aged About 26 Years, Resident Of Nayapura Shekho Ka Bas, Talab Ki Bari, Sojat City, District Pali (Raj.).

4. Rabina Chaturvedi D/o Virendra Kumar Chaturvedi, Aged About 22 Years, Resident Of 130, Keeratpura, Saipur, District Karauli (Raj.).

----Petitioners Versus

1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary, Department Of Medical And Health Services, Secretariat, Jaipur, Rajasthan.

2. The Director, Department Of State Health And Family Welfare Department (Sihfw), Directorate, Jaipur, Rajasthan.

3. Additional Director (Administrative), Department Of Medical And Health Services, Jaipur, Rajasthan.

----Respondents

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 17819/2023

Prakash Chandra Kumawat S/o Shri Samrath Lal Kumawat, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Kanora Road Talai Mohalla, Village Barkheda Rampad Ka Khera, Post Pilloo, Tehsil And District Pratapgarh (Rajasthan).

----Petitioner Versus

1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Principal Secretary, Medical And Health Services, Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.).

2. The Director (Non-Gazetted), Medical, Health And Family Welfare Department, Swasthya Bhawan, Tilak Marg, Jaipur (Raj.).

3. The Director, State Institute Of Health And Family Welfare (Sihfw), Jhalana Doongi Colony, Ghat Ki Guni, Jaipur (Raj.).

----Respondents

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 17828/2023

Nitesh Kumar Patidar S/o Bheru Lal Patidar, Aged About 24 Years, Village Kajli, Ward 13, Bardeeya, Tehsil And District Pratapgarh (Rajasthan).

[2023:RJ-JD:39251] (7 of 38) [CW-14080/2023]

----Petitioner Versus

1. State Of Rajasthan, Trough Its Principal Secretary, Medical And Health Services, Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.).

2. The Director (Non-Gazetted), Medical, Health And Family Welfare Department, Swasthya Bhawan, Tilak Marg, Jaipur (Raj.).

3. The Director, State Institute Of Health And Family Welfare (Sihfw), Jhalana Doongi Colony, Ghat Ki Guni, Jaipur (Raj.).

----Respondents

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 18097/2023

Prakash Bagri S/o Shri Bhunda Ram, Aged About 27 Years, Near Hanuman Mandir, Jaitaran, District Pali (Raj.).

----Petitioner Versus

1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Medical And Health Department, Jaipur.

2. The Director, Directorate Of Medical And Health Services, Jaipur.

3. The Director, State Institute Of Health And Family Welfare, Jhalna Dungri, Jaipur, Rajasthan.

4. The Joint Director, Medical And Health Services, Zone Ajmer, Ajmer.

5. The Chief Medical And Health Officer, District Pali, Rajasthan.

----Respondents

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 18012/2023

1. Raji Ram Prajapat S/o Sanwarmal Prajapat, Aged About 33 Years, Near Kumharo Ka Kunwa, Ward Number 3, Khandwa Patta Pithsar, Khandwa, Churu, Rajasthan.

2. Pramod Bangarwa S/o Ishwar Ram Bangarwa, Aged About 35 Years, 408, Near Reliance Tower Daudsar, District Churu, Rajasthan.

3. Vinod Kumar S/o Ram Chandra Singh, Aged About 37 Years, Ghasssu Ka Vaas, Ghassu, District Sikar, Rajasthan.

4. Justee John W/o Dhawan Shringi, Aged About 37 Years, 395, Prem Shivalya, Near Char Bhuja Mandir, Kotdi Sabji Mandi, Kota, District Kota, Rajasthan.

5. Ravindra Kumar S/o Rajendra Prasad, Aged About 35 Years, Jakharan Kallan, Tehsil Behror, District Alwar, Rajasthan.

6. Bhanu Sharma S/o Kailash Prasad Sharma, Aged About 37 Years, 02, Jai Hind Nagar 2, Police Line Marg, Kota Baran Road, Nya Nohra, Kota, District Kota, Rajasthan.

7. Mahesh Patidar S/o Giriraj, Aged About 38 Years, House

[2023:RJ-JD:39251] (8 of 38) [CW-14080/2023]

No. 28, Boradiya, Jhalawar, Rajasthan.

----Petitioners Versus

1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Department Of Medical And Health Services, Jaipur, Rajasthan.

2. The Director, Rajasthan State Health And Family Welfare Institute, Jaipur, Rajasthan.

3. The Director (Non Gazetted), Department Of Medical And Health Services, Jaipur, Rajasthan.

4. Additional Director (Administrative), Department Of Medical And Health Services, Jaipur, Rajasthan.

5. Joint Director, Department Of Medical And Health Services, Zone Udaipur, Rajasthan.

6. The Chief Medical And Health Officers, District Pratapgarh, Rajasthan.

7. The Chief Medical And Health Officers, District Dungarpur, Rajasthan.

8. The Chief Medical And Health Officers, District Kota, Rajasthan.

9. The Chief Medical And Health Officers, District Churu, Rajasthan.

10. The Chief Medical And Health Officers, District Sikar, Rajasthan.

11. The Chief Medical And Health Officers, District Swaimadhopur, Rajasthan.

12. The Chief Medical And Health Officers, District Bundi, Rajasthan.

----Respondents

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 13839/2023

Ramesh Kumar S/o Shri Bhagavana Ram, Aged About 33 Years, Vada Naya, Tehsil Bagora, District Jalore (Raj.).

----Petitioner Versus

1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Principal Secretary, Medical And Health Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur.

2. The Director, State Health And Family Welfare Institution, Rajasthan, Jaipur.

3. The Director (Non Gazetted), Medical And Health Services, Rajasthan, Tilak Marg, Swasthya Bhawan, Jaipur.

----Respondents

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 14046/2023

Arjun Dev Jakhar D/o Shri Poona Ram Jakhar, Aged About 25 Years, R/o 129, Gosai Mandir Ke Pass, Village Newra Road,

[2023:RJ-JD:39251] (9 of 38) [CW-14080/2023]

Tehsil Osian, District Jodhpur (Raj.)

----Petitioner Versus

1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Principal Secretary, Medical And Health Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur

2. The Director, State Health And Family Welfare Institution, Rajasthan, Jaipur.

3. The Director (Non-Gazetted), Medical And Health Services, Rajasthan, Tilak Marg, Swasthya Bhawan, Jaipur.

----Respondents

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 14279/2023

1. Rajmal Sharma S/o Shri Jagdish Chandra Sharma, Aged About 36 Years, R/o Vpo Amesar, Tehsil Asind, District Bhilwara.

2. Deepak Kumar Sharma S/o Shri Durga Lal Sharma, Aged About 37 Years, R/o Jai Mandir V Bajar, Bagudar, Tehsil Jahazpur, District Bhilwara.

3. Kamal Kumar Sharma S/o Shri Babulal Sharma, Aged About 34 Years, R/o Vpo Harsora, Tehsil Bansur, District Alwar.

4. Sitaram Meena S/o Shri Hari Narayan Meena, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Village Bhivpura, Post Bagwara, Tehsil Amer, District Jaipur.

5. Ramawatar Chouhan S/o Shri Gajanand Chouhan, Aged About 38 Years, R/o Village-Post Nindad, Vaya Vki Aria, Ward No. 1, Tehsil Amer, District Jaipur.

6. Dhara Singh Meena S/o Shri Brij Lal Meena, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Vpo Chandanholi, Tehsil Bamanwas, District Sawai Madhopur.

7. Girdhar Prasad Sharma S/o Shri Jagdish Prasad Sharma, Aged About 38 Years, R/o Village-Post Kundera, Tehsil And District Sawaimadhopur.

8. Navneet Mudgal S/o Shri Eeshvari Prasad Sharma, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Vp Wazirpur, Tehsil Wazirpur, District Sawaimadhopur.

9. Sandeep Sharma S/o Shri Keshav Kumar Sharma, Aged About 33 Years, R/o Village Jhiri, Post Jhiri, Tehsil Sarmathura, District Dhaulpur.

10. Niranjan Lal Sharma S/o Shri Munish Kumar, Aged About 33 Years, R/o Gudhaniya Pada, Sarmathura, District Dhaulpur.

11. Amit Bal Krishna Sharma S/o Shri Bal Krishna Sharma, Aged About 34 Years, R/o Barf Factory Ke Pass, Ward No. 25, Chatikna, Tehsil And District Karauli.

12. Rajendra Singh S/o Shri Harlal Singh, Aged About 31 Years, R/o Dhani Runjawali, Garh Bhopji, Tehsil Khandela, District Sikar.

[2023:RJ-JD:39251] (10 of 38) [CW-14080/2023]

13. Rajat Sharma S/o Shri Purushottam Sharma, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Brahmano Ka Mohalla, Gudha Bairsal, Gurha Barsal, Phulera, Tehsil Mozamabad, District Jaipur.

14. Dinesh Kumar Bagaria S/o Shri Sanwar Mal Bagaria, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Village Todi Madhopura, Tehsil And District Sikar.

15. Sahi Ram S/o Shri Ramdhan Jat, Aged About 39 Years, R/o Ward No. 11, Dholakhera, Udaipurwati, District Jhunjhunu.

16. Niranjan Lal Adi Gaud S/o Shri Govind Prasad Adi Gaud, Aged About 33 Years, R/o Village-Post Gothra, Tehsil Sapotra, District Karauli.

17. Pradip Kumar Meena S/o Shri Devi Lal Meena, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Village-Post Pilikheda, Tehsil Chhoti Sadri, District Pratapgarh.

18. Sarita Kumari W/o Shri Mukesh Kumar, D/o Shri Banwari Lal, Aged About 34 Years, R/o Vivek Colony, Nawalgarh Road, Tehsil And District Sikar.

19. Pramod Kumari W/o Shri Rajendra, D/o Shri Arjun Singh, Aged About 38 Years, R/o Ward No. 14, Vpo Bhojana Beri, Tehsil And District Sikar.

20. Vinod Kumar Saini S/o Shri Om Prakash Balopia, Aged About 34 Years, R/o House No. 509, Radhakrishna Mandir Ke Samne, Ramchandrapura Chhawani, Tehsil Ladpura, District Kota.

21. Ajay Kumar Sharma S/o Shri Prem Chand Sharma, Aged About 37 Years, R/o Vpo Mandawar, Tehsil Mandawar, District Dausa.

----Petitioners Versus

1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Principal Secretary, Medical And Health Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur.

2. The Director, State Health And Family Welfare Institution, Rajasthan, Jaipur.

3. The Director (Non-Gazetted), Medical And Health Services, Rajasthan, Tilak Marg, Swasthya Bhawan, Jaipur.

----Respondents

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 14311/2023

1. Chotu Lal Regar S/o Bhawana Lal Regar, Aged About 30 Years, Village Bhagwanpura, Tehsil Mandalgarh, District Bhilwara.

2. Siddharth Tripati S/o Anil Tripati, Aged About 29 Years, Gd-9, New Bapu Nagar, District Bhilwara.

3. Ravi Prakash Jat S/o Shivraj Jat, Aged About 29 Years, Village Kashipura, Post Dohriya, Tehsil Phuliya Kalan, District Bhilwara.

4. Govind Tiwari S/o Mahaveer Tiwari, Aged About 30

[2023:RJ-JD:39251] (11 of 38) [CW-14080/2023]

Years, Aamdala, District Bhilwara.

5. Sarswati Prajapati D/o Chandra Prakash, Aged About 35 Years, Village Jaithgarh, Dev Narayan Mandir Ke Pass, District Bhilwara.

6. Dinesh Chander Regar S/o Sonath Regar, Aged About 29 Years, Village Malaseri, Post Kanwlas, Tehsil Asind, District Bhilwara.

7. Manoj Kumar Regar S/o Nanaram Regar, Aged About 28 Years, Village Pachanpura, Post Gudha, Tehsil Jahazpur, District Bhilwara.

8. Mukesh Kumar Gunrat S/o Dhuna Ram, Aged About 27 Years, Village Gopalpura, Post Akarsada, Tehsil Badnor, District Bhilwara.

9. Vikas Singh Chouhan S/o Prabhu Dayal Chouhan, Aged About 31 Years, Hanuman Ji Ki Gali, Tehsil Badnor, District Bhilwara.

10. Mahendra Regar S/o Gopal Regar, Aged About 28 Years, Ward No. 1, Tahanal Gate Regar Basti, Shahpura, District Bhilwara.

11. Govind Mali S/o Ramswaroop Mali, Aged About 26 Years, Ward No. 08, Gadri Khera, Tehsil Shahpura, District Bhilwara.

12. Dhrmichand Regar S/o Kaiash Chandra Regar, Aged About 29 Years, Udai Bhan Gate Regar Basti, Tehsil Shahpura, District Bhilwara.

13. Sumant Kumar Dadhich S/o Bheru Lal Dadhich, Aged About 29 Years, Court Road, Mandalgarh, Tehsil Mandalgarh, District Bhilwara.

14. Pooja Meena D/o Maniram Meena, Aged About 27 Years, Pani Ki Tanki Ke Pass, Tehsil And District Chittorgarh.

15. Kailash Chandra Sharma S/o Kishan Gopal Sharma, Aged About 28 Years, Brahamano Ka Mohalla, Jojwa, Tehsil Mandalgarh, District Bhilwara.

16. Madan Lal Khatik S/o Bhanwar Lal Khatik, Aged About 26 Years, 341, Kumharo Ka Mohalla, Nimbaera Jatan, Tehsil Kareda, District Bhilwara.

17. Paras Bheel S/o Narayan Bheel, Aged About 25 Years, Village Dulhepura, Post Nahari, Tehsil Raipur, District Bhilwara.

18. Ranjeet Jat S/o Brahma Lal Jat, Aged About 32 Years, Village Jhaberkiya, District Bhilwara.

19. Satya Narayan Mali S/o Mul Chand Mali, Aged About 29 Years, Mali Mohalla, Jahazpur, District Bhilwara.

20. Doulat Kumar Regar S/o Kalu Ram Regar, Aged About 26 Years, Ambedkar Colony, Ward No. 02, Jahazpur, District Bhilwara.

21. Snehlata Mali D/o Mohan Lal Mali, Aged About 27 Years, Maliyo Ka Mohalla, Badnor, District Bhilwara.

22. Pratishtha Khair D/o Ladu Ram Khair, Aged About 32 Years, Near Power House Asind, District Bhilwara.

[2023:RJ-JD:39251] (12 of 38) [CW-14080/2023]

23. Rajesh Kumar Nuwal S/o Pyar Chand Nuwal, Aged About 34 Years, Sadar Bajar, Daulatgarh, Tehsil Asind, District Bhilwara.

24. Aman Sharma S/o Ladu Lal Sharma, Aged About 25 Years, Village-Post Nandsha Jageer, Tehsil Raipur, District Bhilwara.

25. Abhishek Tailor S/o Gopal Lal Tailor, Aged About 28 Years, 335, Sadar Bajar, Tehsil Raipur, District Bhilwara.

26. Chand Mal Regar S/o Chunni Lal Regar, Aged About 30 Years, Jal Ka Khera, Post Thal Kalan, Tehsil Mandalgarh, District Bhilwara.

27. Arpita Dadhich D/o Govind Narayan Sharma, Aged About 29 Years, Village-Post Shakkargarh, Tehsil Jahazpur, District Bhilwara.

28. Neeraj Solanki S/o Ramesh Kumar Solanki, Aged About 32 Years, Mod Ka Nimbahera, Asind, District Bhilwara.

29. Ganesh Kumar Meena S/o Ram Lal Meena, Aged About 28 Years, Meena Ka Mohalla, Bansholi Road, Vpo Dei, Tehsil Nainwa, District Bundi.

30. Harman Singh Meena S/o Om Prakash Meena, Aged About 28 Years, Village Mangli Kala, Post Chatarganj, Tehsil Hindoli, District Bundi.

31. Seema Jain W/o Saurabh Jain D/o Kailash Chandra Jain, Aged About 39 Years, 207, Veer Sawarkar Chowk, Hari Sewa Marg, Tehsil And District Bhilwara.

32. Abhilasha Verma W/o Rishi Kumar Tailor D/o Narayan Tailor, Aged About 32 Years, In Front Of Rseb Office, Nai Abadi, Bhilwara Road, Mandalgarh, District Bhilwara.

33. Uma Shankar Meena S/o Ram Lal Meena, Aged About 26 Years, Village Trishuliya, Post Bar Dodiya, Tehsil Hindoli, District Bundi.

34. Lokesh Kumar Meena S/o Prithviraj Meena, Aged About 28 Years, Village Khaloonda, Post Suwansa, Tehsil Talera, District Bundi.

----Petitioners Versus

1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Principal Secretary, Medical And Health Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur.

2. The Director, State Health And Family Welfare Institution, Rajasthan, Jaipur.

3. The Director (Non-Gazetted), Medical And Health Services, Rajasthan, Tilak Marg, Swasthya Bhawan, Jaipur.

----Respondents

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 14327/2023

1. Rohit Tailor S/o Shri Ashok Tailor, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Vpo Dalot, Tehsil Dalot, District Pratapgarh.

[2023:RJ-JD:39251] (13 of 38) [CW-14080/2023]

2. Lokesh Kumar S/o Shri Kishan Gopal, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Village Astavan Jadid, Tehsil Kumher, District Bharatpur.

3. Virendra Kumar Yadav S/o Shri Brham Singh Yadav, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Vpo Kithoor Alwar, Tehsil And District Alwar.

4. Manish Gautam S/o Shri Chandrabhan Gautam, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Vpo Enchera, Tehsil Nadbai, District Bharatpur.

5. Mahesh Kuamr Mehra S/o Shri Raja Ram Mehra, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Village Mau, Post Chandpur, Tehsil Mundawar, District Alwar.

6. Ravi S/o Shri Bhoop Singh, Aged About 24 Years, R/o Village Resti, Post Gandoora, Tehsil Laxmangarh, District Alwar.

7. Jalaj Dantla S/o Shri Valchandra Dantla, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Timeda Bada, Post Timeda Bada, Tehsil Kushlgarh, District Banswara.

8. Prakash Chandra Dangar S/o Shri Mani Lal Dangar, Aged About 33 Years, R/o Village Dungra Bada, Tehsil Sajjangarh, District Banswara.

9. Jayesh Kumar S/o Shri Magan Lal Harkshi, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Village Dungra Bada, Tehsil Sajjangarh, District Banswara.

----Petitioners Versus

1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Principal Secretary, Medical And Health Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur.

2. The Director, State Health And Family Welfare Institution, Rajasthan, Jaipur.

3. The Director (Non-Gazetted), Medical And Health Services, Rajasthan, Tilak Marg, Swasthaya Bhawan, Jaipur.

----Respondents

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 14377/2023

1. Pushpendra Dave S/o Teekam Dave, Aged About 31 Years, 01, Brhmpuri, Paton Ka Bar, Tehsil Samdari, District Barmer.

2. Kunal Goswami S/o Prabhu Nath Goswami, Aged About 37 Years, Sardulpura, Tehsil And District Sirohi.

3. Anwar Khan S/o Abbas Khan, Aged About 40 Years, Infront Of Sbi Main Branch, Banjara Mohalla, Tehsil Kekri, District Ajmer.

4. Kamal Singh S/o Kartar Singh, Aged About 28 Years, Village Barkoli, Tehsil Uchain, District Bharatpur.

5. Rahul Kumar Godra S/o Eshwar Chandra, Aged About 32 Years, Jaswant Nagar, Lahchora Kalan, Tehsil Bayana, District Bharatpur.

[2023:RJ-JD:39251] (14 of 38) [CW-14080/2023]

6. Syed Arif Ali S/o Syed Abid Ali, Aged About 43 Years, Village Post Malarna Dungar, District Sawai Madhopur.

----Petitioners Versus

1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Principal Secretary, Medical And Health Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur.

2. The Director, State Health And Family Welfare Institution, Rajasthan, Jaipur.

3. The Director (Non-Gazetted), Medical And Health Services, Rajasthan, Tilak Marg, Swasthya Bhawan, Jaipur.

----Respondents

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 14788/2023

1. Yunas Ali S/o Shri Gulam Mohammed, Aged About 33 Years, R/o Vpo Ajeetpura, Tehsil Bhadra, District Hanumangarh.

2. Subhash Saharan S/o Shri Prithvi Raj, Aged About 38 Years, R/o Ward No. 28, 10Md-C, Bhunnawali Dhani, Tehsil And District Hanumangarh.

3. Sunil Kumar S/o Shri Ram Chander, Aged About 33 Years, R/o Vpo Bheerani, Tehsil Bhadra, District Hanumangarh.

4. Dropdi Godara W/o Shri Chunni Lal, D/o Shri Bhura Ram, Aged About 31 Years, R/o 3 Khd, Village Khedasari Khoda, Tehsil Rawatsar, District Hanumangarh.

5. Pradeep Kumar S/o Shri Hakam Ram, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Ward No. 3, Vpo Dhandhela, Tehsil Nohar, District Hanumangarh.

6. Deepchand S/o Shri Mahaveer Prasad, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Ward No. 7, Thirana Marg, Govt. Sr. Sec. School, Nanau, Tehsil Nohar, District Hanumangarh.

7. Gajender Pal S/o Shri Indraj Berwal, Aged About 31 Years, R/o Ward No. 4, Behind Degree College, Tehsil Suratgarh, District Sriganganagar.

8. Krishan Murari S/o Shri Jagdish, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Ward No. 12, Vpo Salemgarh Masani, Tehsil Tibbi, District Hanumangarh.

9. Neeraj Kumar S/o Shri Hukma Ram, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Ward No. 15, Near Government School, 13 Ksp-B, District Hanumangarh.

10. Surendra Kumar S/o Shri Gopal Ram Nain, Aged About 37 Years, R/o Ward No. 1, Bahlolnagar, Tehsil And District Hanumangarh.

11. Ugarsain S/o Shri Kalu Ram, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Ward No. 05, 9 Dbl Dabli Kalan, Tehsil Tibbi, District Hanumangarh.

12. Hansraj S/o Shri Jagdish Prasad, Aged About 41 Years, R/o Ward No. 11, Uttamsinghwala, 6 Uts, Tehsil And

[2023:RJ-JD:39251] (15 of 38) [CW-14080/2023]

District Hanumangarh.

13. Sunil Kumar S/o Shri Hanuman Prasad, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Ward No. 4, Thalarka Barani, District Hanumangarh.

14. Manju Devi W/o Shri Atalveer, D/o Shri Mahender Singh, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Ward No. 12, Village Bhranpura, Chahuwali, Tehsil Tibbi, District Hanumangarh.

15. Shahana Parveen W/o Shri Mohammad Guljar, Aged About 33 Years, R/o Katla Masjid Ke Pass, Tehsil Kekri, District Ajmer.

----Petitioners Versus

1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Principal Secretary, Medical And Health Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur.

2. The Director, State Health And Family Welfare Institution, Rajasthan, Jaipur.

3. The Director (Non-Gazetted), Medical And Health Services, Rajasthan, Tilak Marg, Swasthya Bhawan, Jaipur.

----Respondents

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 14938/2023

Lalit Mehra S/o Shri Jivan Ram, Aged About 33 Years, R/o Vpo Daulatpura, Tehsil Didwana, District Nagaur (Raj.).

----Petitioner Versus

1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Principal Secretary, Medical And Health Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur.

2. The Director, State Health And Family Welfare Institution, Rajasthan, Jaipur.

3. The Director (Non-Gazetted), Medical And Health Services, Rajasthan, Tilak Marg, Swasthya Bhawan, Jaipur.

----Respondents

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 14984/2023

1. Sandeep Kumar S/o Shri Lallu Ram, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Village Hingwahera, Tehsil Tijara, District Alwar.

2. Manish Kumar Rajoriya S/o Shri Brajkishor Rajoriya, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Village Mator, Tehsil Munawar, District Alwar.

3. Rinkesh Kumar Choudhary S/o Shri Rajendra Kumar, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Village-Post Bhajeet Mia Alwar, Tehsil And District Alwar.

----Petitioners

[2023:RJ-JD:39251] (16 of 38) [CW-14080/2023]

Versus

1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Principal Secretary, Medical And Health Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur.

2. The Director, State Health And Family Welfare Institution, Rajasthan, Jaipur.

3. The Director (Non-Gazetted), Medical And Health Services, Rajasthan, Tilak Marg, Swasthya Bhawan, Jaipur.

----Respondents

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 14987/2023

Sher Singh S/o Shri Moola Ram, Aged About 33 Years, R/o Village Ranwa, Post Barwala, Tehsil Kuchaman City, District Nagaur (Raj.).

----Petitioner Versus

1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Principal Secretary, Medical And Health Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur.

2. The Director, State Health And Family Welfare Institution, Rajasthan, Jaipur.

3. The Director (Non-Gazetted), Medical And Health Services, Rajasthan, Tilak Marg, Swasthya Bhawan, Jaipur.

----Respondents

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 15217/2023

Pratap Singh Raibari S/o Shri Hari Singh Raibari, Aged About 44 Years, R/o Village - Post Vishala, Tehsil Mahwa, District Dausa (Raj.).

----Petitioner Versus

1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Principal Secretary, Medical And Health Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur.

2. The Director, State Health And Family Welfare Institution, Rajasthan, Jaipur.

3. The Director (Non Gazetted), Medical And Health Services, Rajasthan, Tilak Marg, Swasthya Bhawan, Jaipur.

----Respondents

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 15220/2023

Yash Bagrawat S/o Shri Bhagu Ram, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Gujaro Ka Bas, Balara, Tehsil Jaitaran, District Pali (Raj.).

----Petitioner

[2023:RJ-JD:39251] (17 of 38) [CW-14080/2023]

Versus

1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Principal Secretary, Medical And Health Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur.

2. The Director, State Health And Family Welfare Institution, Rajasthan, Jaipur.

3. The Director (Non Gazetted), Medical And Health Services, Rajasthan, Tilak Marg, Swasthya Bhawan, Jaipur.

----Respondents

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 15254/2023

1. Banshi Lal S/o Shri Roop Ram, Aged About 37 Years, Ward No. 26, Gali No. 04, Surya Nagar, Tehsil And District Hanumangarh.

2. Lal Chand Saran S/o Shri Dula Ram Saran, Aged About 29 Years, Vpo Boghera, Tehsil Bhanipura, District Jaipur.

3. Urmila Devi W/o Shri Vinod Kumar D/o Shri Krishan Lal, Aged About 45 Years, Bpj-28, Canal Colony, Tehsil And District Hanumangarh.

4. Gurpreet Singh S/o Shri Jaspal Singh, Aged About 31 Years, Ward No. 02, Opposite Dhan Mandi, Tehsil Tibbi, District Hanumangarh.

5. Shahanaj Bano W/o Shri Mohammad Shakir D/o Shri Nawab Deen, Aged About 30 Years, Ward No. 4, Pathanwala, 17 Ml, Tehsil Ganganagar, District Sriganganagar.

6. Raj Veer S/o Shri Om Prakash, Aged About 31 Years, Ward No. 02, Village Malkhera, Isdr, Tehsil Bhadra, District Hanumangarh.

7. Sunita D/o Shri Dalip Kumar, Aged About 30 Years, Ward No. 2, Kohla, Tehsil And District Hanumangarh.

8. Lal Chand S/o Shri Om Prakash, Aged About 30 Years, Ward No. 03, Chak Idjm Gram Panchayat 48Gb-A, Tehsil Vijaynagar, District Sriganganagar.

9. Lovepreet Singh S/o Shri Satpal Singh, Aged About 27 Years, 22 Ksp Araiyanwali, Ward No. 08, Tehsil And District Hanumangarh.

----Petitioners Versus

1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Principal Secretary, Medical And Health Department, Govenrment Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur.

2. The Director, State Health And Family Welfare Institution, Rajasthan, Jaipur.

3. The Director (Non-Gazetted), Medical And Health Services, Rajasthan, Tilak Marg, Swasthya Bhawan, Jaipur.

----Respondents

[2023:RJ-JD:39251] (18 of 38) [CW-14080/2023]

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 15258/2023

1. Budha Ram Bishnoi S/o Shri Hari Ram Bishnoi, Aged About 45 Years, R/o Vpo Sonari, Tehsil Sedwa, District Barmer.

2. Pawan Kumar Sharma S/o Shri Radhe Shyam Sharma, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Maheshwari Mohalla, Tehsil Rashmi, Pahuna, District Chittorgarh.

3. Dhana Ram Siyag S/o Shri Adu Ram Siyag, Aged About 44 Years, R/o Gidaliya Ka Tala, Chadi, Tehsil Ramsar, District Barmer.

4. Lala Ram S/o Shri Heera Ram Choudhary, Aged About 39 Years, R/o Village-Post Chalkana, Tehsil Sedwa, District Barmer.

5. Ravindra Kumar Vijayvergiya S/o Shri Shanti Lal Vijayvergiya, Aged About 42 Years, R/o Mahajano Ki Basti, Near Charbhuja Mandir, Babrana, Tehsil Bhupalsagar, District Chittorgarh.

6. Krishan Kumar Sharma S/o Shri Shitla Prasad, Aged About 41 Years, R/o Village-Post Talchiri, Tehsil Mahwa, District Dausa.

7. Hanumat Prasad Rajpoot S/o Shri Ramcharan Lal Rajpoot, Aged About 44 Years, R/o Village-Post Raunsi, Tehsil Nadoti, District Karauli.

8. Vinod Choudhary S/o Shri Prahlad Choudhary, Aged About 34 Years, R/o Vpo Pratappura Kalan, Via Kaladera, Tehsil Amer, District Jaipur.

9. Surendra Singh Rathore S/o Shri Bhanwar Singh Rathore, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Govt. School Ke Pass, Sobhana, Tehsil Nokha, District Bikaner.

10. Virendra Singh Rajput S/o Shri Mukut Singh, Aged About 36 Years, R/o Village-Post Udai Kalan, Tehsil And District Sawaimadhopur.

11. Devraj Acharya S/o Shri Lajpat Rai, Aged About 40 Years, R/o E-100, R.k. Colony, Bhilwara.

12. Mala Ram S/o Shri Ganesha Ram, Aged About 33 Years, R/o Sinjguru Road, Rani Bass, Soorpura, Tehsil Nokha, District Bikaner.

13. Lal Singh Rajvi S/o Shri Jaman Singh Rajvi, Aged About 31 Years, R/o Vpo Dhingsari, Tehsil Nokha, District Bikaner.

14. Raj Kumari Ruyal S/o Shri Surendra Kumar Gora, Aged About 34 Years, R/o Vpo Bhilunda, Tehsil Laxmangarh, District Sikar.

----Petitioners Versus

1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Principal Secretary, Medical And Health Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur.

2. The Director, State Health And Family Welfare Institution, Rajasthan, Jaipur.

[2023:RJ-JD:39251] (19 of 38) [CW-14080/2023]

3. The Director (Non-Gazetted), Medical And Health Service, Rajasthan, Tilak Marg, Swasthya Bhawan, Jaipur.

----Respondents

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 16490/2023

Heena Kumari D/o Late Shri Lumba Ram, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Ravala Vali Gali, Novi, Tehsil Sumerpura, District Pali.

----Petitioner Versus

1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Director, State Institute Of Health And Family Welfare, Jhalana Institutional Area, Jaipur.

2. Paras Kanwar D/o Shri Goopal Singh, Through The Director, State Institute Of Health And Family Welfare, Jhalana Institutional Area, Jaipur.

----Respondents

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 16759/2023

Ram Prakash Bhadu S/o Shri Rugha Ram, Aged About 35 Years, Bhaduo Ka Bas, Village Kalru, Block Merta, District Nagaur, Rajasthan.

----Petitioner Versus

1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Additional Chief Secretary, Medical Health And Family Welfare Department, Swasthya Bhawan, Tilak Marg, C Scheme, Ashok Nagar, Jaipur, Rajasthan Pin 302001

2. Director, State Institute Of Health And Family Welfare (Sihfw), Jhalana Doongri Colony, Ghat Ki Guni, Jaipur, Rajasthan Pin 302004.

3. Chief Medical And Health Officer, District Nagaur, Swasthya Bhawan, Bikaner Road, Near Hawai Patti, Nagaur, Rajasthan Pin 341001

4. District Collectort (District Nagaur), State Highway-19, Nagaur, Rajasthan.

----Respondents

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 17201/2023

Suman Kanwar D/o Sh. Sujan Singh Rathore, Aged About 26 Years, R/o V/p Naya Aita, Pokran, Jaiselmer.

----Petitioner Versus

1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary, Medical And Health Department, Jaipur (Raj.)

2. The Joint Secretary, Medical And Health Department, Secretariat, Jaipur.

[2023:RJ-JD:39251] (20 of 38) [CW-14080/2023]

3. Director, Medical And Health Services, Jaipur.

4. Director, Medical And Family Welfare Department, Jaipur (Raj.)

----Respondents

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 17387/2023

Shyam Sunder S/o Shri Jagdish Swami, Aged About 37 Years, R/o 33, Chak 3Knj, Shyam Singh Colony, Hanumangarh, Rajasthan.

----Petitioner Versus

1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Principal Secretary, (Government Of Rajasthan), Medical And Health Services, Jaipur, Rajasthan.

2. The Director (Public Health), Medical And Health Services, Government Of Rajasthan, Tilak Marg, C- Scheme, Jaipur, Rajasthan.

3. Mission Director, State Health Samiti (Nrhm), Swasthya Bhawan, Tilak Marg, C-Scheme, Jaipur, Rajasthan.

4. Additional Director, (Administration), Medical And Health Services, Swasthya Bhawan, Tilak Marg, C- Scheme, Jaipur, Rajasthan.

5. Chief Medical And Health Officer, P And T Colony, Hanumangarh, District Hanumangarh, Rajasthan.

----Respondents

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 17431/2023

Mueskh Kumar Bhambu S/o Bhera Ram, Aged About 29 Years, Village And Post Singar, Tehsil Nagaur, District Nagaur (Raj.)

----Petitioner Versus

1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Joint Secretary, Department Of Medical And Health (Group-3), Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.)

2. Director, State Institute Of Health And Family Welfre (Sihfw), Jhalana Dungri, Jaipur (Raj.)

3. Director (Public Health), Medical And Health Services, Rajasthan, Jaipur

----Respondents

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 17603/2023

1. Laxman Lal Meghwal S/o Shri Swaroob Lal Meghwal, Aged About 34 Years, R/o Ward No. 4, Meghwal Basti, Kelwara, District Rajsamand.

2. Satish Chandra Ameta S/o Shri Nena Lal Ameta, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Village-Post Antri, Kumbhalgarh,

[2023:RJ-JD:39251] (21 of 38) [CW-14080/2023]

District Rajsamand.

----Petitioners Versus

1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Principal Secretary, Medical And Health Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur.

2. The Director, State Health And Family Welfare Institution, Rajasthan, Jaipur.

3. The Director (Non Gazetted), Medical And Health Services, Rajasthan, Tilak Marg, Swasthya Bhawan, Jaipur.

----Respondents

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 4143/2023

Pawan Kumar Rao S/o Shri Niranjan Kumar Rao, Aged About 31 Years, Resident Of Ward No. 17, Sardarshahar, Churu.

----Petitioner Versus

1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary, Department Of Local Self, Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.).

2. Director, Department Of Local Self, G-3, Raj Mahal Residency Area, Civil Lines Gate, 22 Godown, Jaipur (Raj.).

3. Municipal Board, Shardarshahar, District Churu Through Its Executive Officer.

----Respondents

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 4146/2023

1. Ummed Kadela S/o Jara Ram Kadela, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Village Khari Kalla, Post Palasani, Dist. Jodhpur Persently Working As I.r.f. Jodhpur Ranj, Jodhpur.

2. Dr. Rajendra Kumar S/o Banwari Lal, Aged About 47 Years, R/o Mohalla Ahemad Bas, District Alwar Persently Working As Agriculture Ext. Krishi Vibhag, Bag Kale Kha, Near Nagar Palika Kishangarh Bas District Alwar, (Raj.).

----Petitioners Versus

1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Principal Secretary, Department Of Finance, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.).

2. Secretary, Department Of Finance (Budget), Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.).

3. Director, Directorate Of State Insurance And Provident Fund Department, Bima Bhawan, Jaisingh Highway, Banipark Jaipur (Raj.).

----Respondents

[2023:RJ-JD:39251] (22 of 38) [CW-14080/2023]

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 4147/2023

1. Gangaram S/o Dheera Ram Meghwal, Aged About 31 Years, R/o Bairdo Ka Bas, Tehsil Osian, District Jodhpur Presently Working As School Lecturer In Government Senior Secondary School Dhundhada, Tehsil Osian District Jodhpur (Raj)

2. Sharwan Kumar Meghwal S/o Ishwar Ram, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Tehsil Nokha, District Bikaner Presently Working As 2Nd Grade Teacher In Mahatma Ghandi Government School, Roda, Tehsil Nokha District Bikaner (Raj)

3. Takuram Meghwal S/o Sharwan Ram, Aged About 37 Years, R/o Tehsil Nokha District Bikaner Presently Working As School Lecturer In Government Senior Secondary School Hanshasar, Panchu District Bikaner (Raj)

4. Pradeep Kumar Bhagora S/o Prem Lal Bhagora, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Village Kherwara Post Sulai District Udaipur Presently Working As 3Rd Grade Teacher In Government Upper Primary School Rel Mahudi, Lasadiya District Udaipur (Raj)

5. Koshalya D/o Bhagaram, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Bahtinda District Jodhpur Present Posting At Teacher Grade 3Rd Government Senior Secondary School, Birdawas District Jodhpur.

6. Ram Sahay Yadav S/o Ram Dev Yadav, Aged About 50 Years, R/o Patan, Tehsil Kishangarh, District Ajmer Presently Working On The Post Of Senior Teacher Sanskrit Government Senior Secondary School, Nalu, Kishangarh, District Ajmer.

----Petitioners Versus

1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Principal Secretary, Department Of Finance, Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur.

2. Secretary, Finance (Budget), Department Of Finance, Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur.

3. Director, Directorate Of State Insurance And Provident Fund, Department, Bima Bhawan, Jaisingh Highway, Banipark, Jaipur.

----Respondents

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 4181/2023

Nikesh Pandya S/o Priyakant Pandya, Aged About 44 Years, R/o 298, New Colony, Dungarpur (Raj.).

----Petitioner Versus

1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Secretary, Rural Development And Panchayati Raj Department, Government Secretariat, Rajasthan, Jaipur.

[2023:RJ-JD:39251] (23 of 38) [CW-14080/2023]

2. The District Collector, Dungarpur.

3. The Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad, Dungarpur.

4. The Development Officer, Panchayat Samiti Dungarpur, District Dungarpur.

5. The Development Officer, Panchayat Samiti Jhonthari, District Dungarpur.

----Respondents

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mahaveer Bishnoi a/w Mr. Jayram Saran.

Mr. Rajeev Purohit a/w Mr. Shashank Joshi.

Mr Manoj Bohra.

Mr. Pawan Singh.

Mr. V.L.S. Rajpurohit, on VC.

Mr. Abhimanyu Singh Rathore.

Mr. Falgun Buch.

Mr. Vikram Singh Bhawla.

Mr. Mahipal Charan a/w Mr. Hitesh Kumar.

Mr. R.R. Ankiya a/w Mr. Bhima Ram.

Mr. Chandan Singh Jodha.

Mr. L.S. Udawat.

Mr. Hardik Gautam for Mr. Rakesh Arora.

Mr. Shreyash Ramdev.

For Respondent(s) : Mr. M.S. Singhvi, Advocate General, on VC assisted by Mr. Kartik Lodha.

Mr. K.S. Rajpurohit, AAG assisted by Mr. Rajat Arora and Mr. Lucky Rajpurohit.

HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI

Order

16/11/2023

1. Since all the instant petitions involve a common controversy,

though with marginal variation in the contextual facts, therefore,

for the purposes of the present analogous adjudication, the facts

and the prayer clauses are being taken from the above-numbered

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.14080/2023 while treating the same as

a lead case, rival submissions of the parties and the observations

[2023:RJ-JD:39251] (24 of 38) [CW-14080/2023]

of the Court, in the present order, would also be based,

particularly, on the factual matrix of the lead case.

1.1 The prayer clauses read as under:-

"It is, therefore, most humbly prayed that this writ petition may kindly be allowed with cost and by and appropriate writ, order or directions; (i) the respondents may kindly be directed to award 10 bonus marks to the petitioner for the period for which he is working as GNM through Rajasthan Medicare Relief Society for more than one year in addition to 15 bonus marks which granted to the petitioner for the Covid period. (ii) the respondents may kindly be directed to grant total 25 bonus marks i.e. 15 bonus marks for In wake of onslaught of COVID- 19, abundant caution is being taken while hearing the matters in Court. period as GNM and 10 bonus marks for which petitioner working additionally one year through Rajasthan Medicare Relief society and (iii) the respondents may kindly be further directed after granting 25 bonus marks to the petitioner revised the list of documents verification which issued vide information dated 29.08.2023 (Annex. 11) and if petitioner stands in merit list then he called for documents verification and further if his name figured in the final merit list then he may be given appointment on the post of Nursing Officer in pursuance of the advertisement dated 05.05.2023 (Annex.8.).

Any other appropriate writ, order or direction, which this Hon'ble Court may deem just and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case, may kindly be passed in favour of the petitioner.

Costs of the wit petition may kindly be awarded to the petitioner."

[2023:RJ-JD:39251] (25 of 38) [CW-14080/2023]

2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the

controversy in these cases is emanating out of the recruitment to

the various posts i.e. of Nursing and Paramedical Officer, Female

Health Worker, Lab Technician and Dental Technician. Initially the

recruitment was initiated by the State Government vide

advertisement dated 16.11.2022 to be conducted in accordance

with the Rajasthan Medical & Health Subordinate Service Rules,

1965 (hereinafter referred to as the 'Rules of 1965'), but

subsequently the advertisement was withdrawn and a fresh

advertisement was issued on 05.05.2023 whereby the same

recruitment was to be done under the Rules of 1965.

3. The bone of contention being the bonus marks to be given

and not to be given arose and the experience clauses prompted

the petitioners to come before this Court. The broader controversy

was also laid before the Division Bench of this Court at Jaipur

Bench in case of Bhanwar Kumar Bagaria & Ors. Vs. The

State of Rajasthan & Ors. (D.B. Civil Writ Petition

No.5980/2022) alongwith other connected matters, in which,

the interim order was not granted by Division Bench of this Court

at Jaipur Bench, but the protection of the selection process

remaining subject to the final outcome of the writ petition was

granted. The order dated 08.08.2023 reads as follows:

"Heard.

Except D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 3471/2022, which is a PIL seeking direction for expeditious completion of selection process, all other petitions seek to challenge the constitutional validity of the provisions contained in respect of recruitment rules

[2023:RJ-JD:39251] (26 of 38) [CW-14080/2023]

for appointment to the post of Pharmacist, Nursing Officer, Homeopathy Medical Officer & Ayurved Medical Officer.

A prayer has been made for staying operation of the rule and recruitment process for appointment to the post of Pharmacist, Nursing Officer, Homeopathy Medical Officer & Ayurved Medical Officer on the ground that the process of recruitment does not include written examination, but is based on assessment of merit on the basis of performance in qualifying examination and weightage for actual experience of working on the respective post, by providing bonus marks.

Learned counsels for the petitioners in various petitions raise common submissions to the effect that impugned provision for selection on various posts is violative of Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India. Learned counsels, relying upon the Constitution Bench judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Dr. Preeti Srivastava and Another Versus State of M.P. and Others and other batch of petitions, (1999) 7 Supreme Court Cases 120 and the judgments of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the cases of Dr. Dinesh Kumar and Others Versus Motilal Nehru Medical College, Allahabad and Others, (1985) 3 Supreme Court Cases 22, Shri Chander Chinar Bada Akhara Udasin Society and Others Versus State of J & K and Others, (1996) 5 Supreme Court Cases 732, Ravindra Kumar Rai Versus State of Maharashtra and Others, (1998) 3 Supreme Court Cases 183, Vishesh Kumar Versus Shanti Prasad, (1980) 2 Supreme Court Cases 378, Romesh Kumar Sharma Versus Union of India and Others, (2006) 6 Supreme Court Cases 510 & Ramjit Singh Kardam and Others Versus Sanjeev Kumar and Others, (2020) 20 Supreme Court Cases 209, would submit that the process of selection

[2023:RJ-JD:39251] (27 of 38) [CW-14080/2023]

involving assessment of merit only on the basis of marks obtained in qualifying examination or interview has been held to be arbitrary, as it does not fulfill the objective of selection of best candidates on the ground of suitability. It is contended that assessment of merit of candidates in the competitive examination on the basis of marks obtained in qualifying examination has been consistently held to be violative of Article 14 of the Constitution of India as the marks are obtained by the candidates from different educational institutions with varying standards of courses of study, quality of teaching & pattern of examination. In such cases, holding selection and assessing merit on the basis of qualifying marks as provided in the impugned rules would be violative of Articles 14 & 16 of the Constitution of India. It is also contended that while the main provision provides for written examination, proviso contains provisions which are contrary to the scheme contained in the main part of the rule.

On the other hand, learned Advocate General, relying upon the Constitution Bench judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of R. Chitralekha & Another Versus State of Mysore and Others, AIR 1964 SC 1823 and the judgments of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the cases of Kiran Gupta and Others Versus State of U.P. and Others, (2000) 7 Supreme Court Cases 719, Srinivas K. Gouda Versus Karnataka Institute of Medical Sciences and Others, (2022) 1 Supreme Court Cases 49, Anzar Ahmad Versus State of Bihar and Others, (1994) 1 Supreme Court Cases 150, Health for Millions Versus Union of India and Others, (2014) 14 Supreme Court Cases 496, Maharashtra State Board of Secondary and Higher Secondary Education and Another Versus Paritosh Bhupeshkumar Sheth and Others, (1984) 4 Supreme

[2023:RJ-JD:39251] (28 of 38) [CW-14080/2023]

Court Cases 27, Forum for People's Collective Efforts (FPCE) and Another Versus State of West Bengal and Another, (2021) 8 Supreme Court Cases 599, Rana Randhir Singh and Others Versus State of U.P. and Others & Other Batch of petitions, (1989) Supp (1) Supreme Court Cases 615, Ashutosh Gupta Versus State of Rajasthan and Others, (2002) 4 Supreme Court Cases 34, State of Rajasthan & Others Versus Archana ETC., Civil Appeal No.11406-11407 of 2016, decided on 26.11.2016, Manoj Kumar Acharya Versus The State of Rajasthan and Others and other batch of appeals, Civil Appeal No.12335/2016, decided on 18.01.2022, Dhanraj Versus Vikram Singh and Others, Civil Appeal No.3117/2009, decided on 10.05.2023 as also the Single Bench judgment of the High Court of Judicature at Madras in the case of R. Subramanian & Another Versus The State of Tamil Nadu & Others, Writ Petition No.29313 of 2019 and other batch of writ petitions, decided on 21.11.2019 and the Single Bench judgment of this Court at Principal Seat, Jodhpur in the case of Mahendra Kumar Versus State of Rajasthan & Others, S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.9352 of 2013, decided on 26.09.2013, the Single Bench judgment of this Court at Jaipur Bench in the case of Anand Kumar Versus State of Rajasthan and Another and other batch of petitions, S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.365/1978, would submit that present is not a case where the process of selection is based only on marks obtained in qualifying examination. He would submit that for the purpose of assessing merit of the candidates, the rule not only postulates assessment of merit on the basis of academic performance, but also weightage to be given by way of bonus marks for experience gained by working on various posts. He would submit that in various judgments cited by the respondents,

[2023:RJ-JD:39251] (29 of 38) [CW-14080/2023]

combination of marks in qualifying examination and interview or marks in qualifying examination and bonus marks has been upheld and the challenge to such process of selection on the ground that they violate Articles 14 & 16 of the Constitution of India, has been repelled. He would further submit that in the exigencies of service when large number of posts in the health department are lying vacant and there is need for manning the posts in various cadre like Pharmacist, Nursing Officer, Homeopathy Medical Officer, Ayurved Medical Officer and other posts, which are thousands in number, the scheme of the rule providing for assessment of merit on more than one criteria and not merely confined to marks obtained in qualifying examination cannot be said to be arbitrary. He would further submit that, even if, it is held that holding of written examination with combination of qualifying marks, weightage marks & interview has been found to be one of the permissible methods of selection, it cannot be said that invariably in all cases, if written examination is not held, the scheme of selection would necessarily be violative of Articles 14 & 16 of the Constitution of India. Relying upon the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Dhanraj Versus Vikram Singh & Others (Supra), it has been submitted that present is not a case where the process of recruitment is under challenge on the ground of violation of the provisions of recruitment, but the rule itself is under challenge and, therefore, unless the statutory provisions are declared constitutionally invalid, the process of selection may not be stayed as that would amount to staying the operation of the rules.

Learned Advocate General would next submit that, even if, an arguable case is made out, which this Court may examine, if the process of selection is

[2023:RJ-JD:39251] (30 of 38) [CW-14080/2023]

stayed, the public interest would be adversely affected as the process of recruitment is being held to fill up more than 13,000 posts in different cadres, as on account of large number of vacancies, health services in the State are being adversely affected. The interest of the petitioners may be protected by making the selection process subject to the final result.

Learned counsels for the parties have cited various judgments and we have extensively heard both the parties on the issue of stay. While learned counsel for the petitioners heavily relied upon the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Ramjit Singh Kardam and Others Versus Sanjeev Kumar and Others (Supra), learned Advocate General has also placed before this Court several judgments where, even though the process of selection did not involve written examination, a combination of other criteria like marks obtained in qualifying examination with weightage for experience of actual working on the post for which the recruitment is being made or other cases with different combination without there being written examination, selection has been upheld. In the case of Ramjit Singh Kardam and Others Versus Sanjeev Kumar and Others (Supra), the process of selection initially comprised of written examination, but later on written examination was not held and the only basis for short listing was interview, which was held to be bad in law.

We further find that the interest of the petitioners can be protected by making the selection process subject to the final outcome of these petitions except D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 3471/2022.

Therefore, having regard to the considerations as above, though we are not inclined to halt entire process of selection, we order that selection and

[2023:RJ-JD:39251] (31 of 38) [CW-14080/2023]

appointment, if any made, would be subject to final outcome of these petitions except D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 3471/2022. The respondents while making any appointments shall clearly state that those appointments are subject to final outcome of these petitions except D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 3471/2022.

Stay applications are, accordingly, disposed off. All these petitions be listed for final hearing in the month of October, 2023."

4. Learned counsel for the parties are in broader agreement

that the grant of bonus marks under Rule 19 of the Rules of 1965

is accepted legal proposition, however, the aspects of such bonus

marks including the experience, type of experience, work

discharged and other avenues were required to be visited by the

respondents before going into the merits.

5. On the last date Mr. M.S. Singhvi, learned Advocate General

assisted by Mr. K.S. Lodha and Mr. K.S. Rajpurohit, learned

Additional Advocate General assisted by Mr. Rajat Arora submitted

that the State at the highest level is considering formation of the

Committee, which shall address all the issues, which are pending

adjudication before this Court.

6. Mr. Singhvi, learned Advocate General today in pursuance of

his earlier submission has brought on record an order dated

03.11.2023 whereby a Committee has been constituted for

addressing all the issues, which are pending before this Court and

it is submitted that the core issues are being dealt with as a policy

decision to be referred to the Committee, which are Item Nos. 37,

39, 41 and 42, which are reproduced as follows:

[2023:RJ-JD:39251] (32 of 38) [CW-14080/2023]

37 vuqHko izek.k i=ksa ekuuh; U;k;ky; esa nk;j ifjoknksa lfefr }kjk tkjh fd;s x;s vuqHko dk lR;kiuA esa cM+h la[;k esa ifjokn vuqHko çek.k i=ksa ds lacaèk esa f'kdk;rs izek.k i=ksa o ns; cksul dks ysdj çkIr gksus rFkk cMh la[;k esa nk;j fd;s x;s gSA lkFk gh ;g Hkh U;kf;d çdj.k ntZ gksus fd fLFkfr egRoiw.kZ gS fd fofHkUu ifjosnukvksa dks xaHkhj ekurs gq;s bl ij euu ds ek/;e ls vH;fFkZ;ksa us vf/kd`r fd;k x;kA vuqHko çek.k i= tkjh vf/kdkfj;ksa }kjk tkjh vuqHko djus esa dh xbZ vfu;ferrk, fdlh izek.k i=ksa dh izekf.kdrk ij Hkh ifjfLFkfr esa Lohdk;Z ugha gSA vkifRr ntZ dh gSA lkFk gh ;g Hkh vuqHko çek.k i= tkjh djus esa ,d rF; gS fd ekuuh; jktLFkku cjrh xbZ vfu;ferrkvksa ds lacaèk esa mPp U;k;ky;] tks/kiqj us fjV lacafèkr vfèkdkjh ds fo:) dBksj ;kfpdk la[;k 19677@2022 vuq'kklukRed dk;Zokgh vey esa ykykjke cuke ljdkj o vU; esa yk;s tkus dk fu.kZ; fy;k x;kA fu.kZ; ikfjr dj jkT; ljdkj dks pwafd ekuuh; U;k;ky; esa cMh izek.k i=ksa dh izekf.kdrk ,oa la[;k esa buds lacaèk esa çdj.k ntZ bldh izfof'V;ksa dh tkap dj fu.kZ; gks jgs gS] vr% vuqHko çek.k i=ksa ysus dk vf/kdkj o ftEesnkjh nh dh iquZ tkap dk dk;Z djok;k gSA vr% ekuuh; U;k;ky; ds mDr tkuk vko';d gSaA vr% bl gsrq fu.kZ; ds ifjizs{; esa ;g vko";d leLr vuqHko çek.k i= tkjhdrkZ gks tkrk gS fd jkT; ljdkj Lrj vfèkdkfj;ksa dks bl ckcr~ i`Fkd ls ij leLr vuqHko izek.k i=ksa dh iquZlR;kiu gsrq ifjf'k"V tkjh fd;k tkjhdrkZ vf/kdkjh@izfrfuf/k dh tkdj mUgsa fnukad 10-12-2023 rd mifLFkfr esa fjdkMZ ls lR;kiu dj muds }kjk tkjh fd;s x;s vuqHko tkap dh tk;s rkfd voS/k@vuqfpr çek.k i=ksa esa ntZ dh xbZ lwpuk <ax ls tkjh vuqHko izek.k i= dks dks iqu% ntZ djus dk volj çnku fujLr dj ,sls leLr vH;fFkZ;ksa ds fd;k tk;sA rRi"pkr vuqHko çek.k vfu;fer p;u dks jksdk tk ldsA i=ksa dh xgjkbZ ls tkap djus gsrq bl gsrq izFke pj.k esa jkT; ljdkj 'khQw esa dSEi yxkdj] vuqHko çek.k ds ek/;e ls lHkh vf/kd`r vuqHko tkjhdrkZ vfèkdkfj;ksa dks fjdkMZ izek.k i= tkjhdrkZ vf/kdkfj;ksa dks lfgr cqyok;s tkus dk dk;Z fnukad fn"kk&funsZ"k o iquZlR;kiu izi= 11-12-2023 ls 31-01-2024 rd fnukad 10-11-2023 rd izsf'kr fd;k fd;k tk;sA foHkkx }kjk Lo;a ds tkuk izLrkfor gS ftlesa os fnukad Lrj ij vuqHko çek.k i=ksa dh tkap 10-12-2023 rd muds }kjk tkjh ds lacaèk fd;s tkus okys dk;Z ds fd, x, leLr vuqHko izek.k i=ksa lacaèk Jheku~ egkfèkoäk ds ekè;e dh vkosndokj@inokj tkudkjh ls ekuuh; U;k;ky; dks Hkh lwfpr ntZ dj ldsaA fpfdRlk f"k{kk fd;k tk;sA vuqHko çek.k i=ksa dk foHkkx ds v/khu lapkfyr laLFkkuksa iquZlR;kiu@çek.khdj.k djok;k ds laca/k esa i`Fkd lss Hkh izeq[k tkdj bldk lekos'k vafre p;u "kklu lfpo egksn;] fpfdRlk lwph tkjh djus esa fd;k tk;s rFkk f"k{kk foHkkx dks mDr dk;Z ds laca/k mä dk;Z esa ykijokgh cjrus okys esa i= fy[kk tkuk izLrkfor gSA tkjhdrkZ vfèkdkfj;ksa ds fo:) blds mijkUr fnukad 11-12-2023 l[r vuq'kklukRed dk;Zokgh ls 31-01-2024 rd dk;ZØe cukdj vey esa ykbZ tk;sA ftys@tkjhdrkZ vfèkdkjhokj pwafd vuqHko vkèkkfjr cksul vad iquZlR;kiu gsrq jkT; LokLF; ,oa esfjV lwph dks o`gn :i ls çHkkfor ifjokj dY;k.k laLFkku] t;iqj esa djrk gSA vr% ;g vko';d gS fd leLr vfèkdkfj;ksa dks e; leLr fdlh Hkh vH;FkÊ dks xyr cksul fjdkMZ ds vkeaf=r fd;k tk;sxk ,oa vad uk fn;s tk;saA funs'kd] 'khQw }kjk vko';drk vr% foHkkx }kjk vuqHko çek.k i=ksa vuqlkj Vhe cukdj tkjh vuqHko dk lR;kiu @ çek.khdj.k djk;k çek.k i=ks dk lR;kiu @ tkuk vko';d gS ,oa çekf.kdj.k djok;k tk;sxk ,oa bl iquZçek.khdj.k ifj.kke ds vuqlkj iquZlR;kiu ds ifj.kke dks çksfotuy esfjV lwph dks la'kksfèkr çksfotuy lwph ds MsVk esa v|ru dj gh vafre p;u lwph tkjh fd;k tk;sxk rkfd vafre p;u fd;k tkuk ;Fkksfpr gksxkA vè;{k lwph esa bldk lekos'k fd;k tk egksn;k us funZs'k iznku fd;s fd ldsA vuqHko iquZlR;kiu izek.k i= dks ;FkklaHko ljy cuk;k tk;s ftlls fd lwpuk vafdr djus okys vfèkdkjh dks bl gsrq dfBukbZ

[2023:RJ-JD:39251] (33 of 38) [CW-14080/2023]

mRiUu ugha gksA 39 Ifjosnukvksa dk 7 inksa gsrq tkjh dh xbZ izksfotuy uflZax ,oa iSjkesfMdy laoxZ esa fuLrkj.kA lwfp;ksa ij vkWuykbZu iksVZy ij tkjh dh xbZ varfje p;u lwfp;ksa vH;fFkZ;ksa ls vkifÙk ntZ djok;s ij çkIr gksus okyh v‚uykbZu tkus gsrq ifjosnuk,a vkeaf=r dh ifjosnukvksa dk dk;Z vfr&egRoiw.kZ xbZ FkhA vafre rkSj ij 17-10-2023 gksus ij desVh ds lHkh lnL;ksa rd ifjosnuk,a çkIr dh xbZ gSaA ,der gSA varfje p;u lwfp;ksa ds çkIr ifjosnukvksa dks ifjosnuk lacaèk esa ntZ fd;s tkus okys fuLrkj.k lfefr ds le{k j[kk U;kf;d çdj.kksa fd la[;k ds - tkdj fuLrkj.k djok;k tkdj MsVk f"Vxr] çkIr gksus okyh ifjosnukvksa esa vko';d la'kksèku mijkUr vafre dk lgh fuLrkj.k vR;ar egRoiw.kZ p;u lwph tkjh dh tkuh gksxhA dk;Z gSA ifjosnuk, vkeaf=r fd;s ifjosnukvksa ds lacaèk esa cSad }kjk tkus ls Li"V gS fd foHkkx Lo;a vuqcafèkr QeZ }kjk miyCèk djk;s vius Lrj ij bldh xaHkhjrk ds x;s MkVk esa lqèkkj fd, tkus dh fy;s ltx ,oa ç;kljr gSA çkIr vko';drk gSA ftl gsrq mUgsa ifjosnuvksa dk fuLrkj.k ifjosnuk i= }kjk funZsf'kr dj fn;k x;k gSA fuLrkj.k lfefr ds ekè;e ls yxHkx 5000 ifjosnukvksa ij fnukad 31-01-2024 rd iw.kZ djrs dk;Zokgh dh tkuh gSA bl gsrq çkIr gq;s ifjosnuk fuLrkj.k lfefr ds ifjosnukvksa dks bUækt djokus dh dk;Zokgh fooj.k dk çdk'ku dk;Zokgh çfØ;kèkhu gSA bUækt dh fu;ekuqlkj fd;k tk;sA ifjosnuk dk;Zokgh iw.kZ gksus ds mijkUr fuLrkj.k fd;s tkus ds lacaèk esa çR;sd vH;FkÊ dh ifjosnuk dk fd;s tk jgsa dk;Z ls ekuuh; mlds vkosnu QkeZ ds lkFk layXu U;k;ky; dks Hkh Jheku egkfèkoäk nLrkostksa ls feyku foHkkxh; ds ekè;e ls voxr djok;k tk;sA fVIi.kh ds lkFk ifjosnuk fuLrkj.k lfefr ds le{k çLrqr fd;k tk;sxkA ifjosnuk fuLrkj.k lfefr }kjk ifjosnukvksa dk fuLrkj.k dj fn;s tkus ds mijkUr rn~uqlkj çksfotuy esfjV esa vko';d la'kksèku dj ifjosnuk fuLrkj.k lfefr ds dk;Zokgh fooj.k dk çdk'ku Lihfdax v‚MZj ¼vk[;kRed vkns'k½ tkjh dj fd;k tk ldsxkA ifjosnuk fuLrkj.k dk dk;Z vfr laosnu'khy ç--fr dk gksus ,oa ifjosnukvksa dh la[;k dks ns[krs gq;s ;g dk;Z fnukad 31-01-

2024 rd iw.kZ gksus dh laHkkouk gSA 41 dk;Z ;kstuk fcUnq ekuuh; U;k;ky; esa izfØ;k/khu izLrkokuqlkj vuqeksfnrA la[;k 3 ls 9 esa HkfrZ;ksa esa lh,p, dks vuqHko fn, ekuuh; U;k;ky; tkus] lh,pvks dks vuqHko ugha fn, ds le{k tkus] cksul vad 15 fn, tkus ds fopkjk/khu laca/k esa cMh la[;k esa egRoiw.kZ izdj.kksa ds izdj.k fopkjk/khu gSa ;|fi n`f'Vxr ,d ekg foHkkx ,oa laLFkku }kjk mDr dk fjtoZ le;A ;kfpdkvksa esa Jheku egkf/koDrk jktLFkku ljdkj ds ek/;e ls izHkkoh :i ls jkT; i{k j[kok;k tkdj HkrhZ izfØ;k ds fo:) fu.kZ;

ikfjr ugha fd, tkus gsrq lHkh laHko iz;kl fd;s tk jgs gS] rks Hkh mijksDr esa ls fdlh Hkh izdj.k esa foijhr fu.kZ; ikfjr fd, tkus dh fLFkfr esa varfje p;u lwfp;ksa esa Hkkjh cnyko djus dh vko";drk gksxh ftl dkj.k ,d ekg dh vfrfjDr fjtoZ vof/k dk izko/kku j[kk tkuk mfpr gksxkA

[2023:RJ-JD:39251] (34 of 38) [CW-14080/2023]

42 vH;fFkZ;ksa }kjk mijksDr fcUnq la[;k 10 ij desVh ds lnL;ksa }kjk cM+h la[;k ifjosnuk izLrkfor dk;Z ;kstuk ds vuweksnu esa U;kf;d izdj.k ntZ gksus ds fuLrkj.k ls iwoZ mijkUr izfØ;k/khu xfrfof/k;ksa tSls dkj.k vf/kdka"k gh ekuuh; [ksydwn izek.k i=ksa dh tkap] vf/kdkfj;ksa@deZpkfj;ksa dk le; U;k;ky; esa vkj,ulh ls lacaf/kr izdj.k] vuqHko buesa yx tkus ,oa bl dkj.k ls ifjokn nk;j izek.k i=ksa dk lR;kiu] vU; jkT;ksa HkrhZ izfØ;k ds "ks'k dk;Z izHkkfor fd;s tkus ls fjV ls O;kolkf;d ;ksX;rk izkIr gksus ij euu fd;k x;kA ;kfpdk ds vH;fFkZ;ksa dh vadrkfydkvksa dk lnL;ksa }kjk dk;Z ;kstuk vuqlkj izh&eSP;ksj ?kksf'kr lR;kiu ,oa blesa yxus okys le; dh tkus okyh xfrfof/k;ka tSls [ksy djok;s tkus gsrq ds cikjs esa ekuuh; U;k;ky; dks izek.k i=kas dh tkap] mU; jkT;ksa ls ekuuh; U;k;ky; voxr djkrs gq;s mijksDr ls O;kolkf;d ;ksX;rk izkIr djus okys dks voxr djk;k lacaf/kr orZeku esa nk;j fjV vkosndksa dh tkap] dkSafly ls tkukA ;kfpdkvksa dks izh&eSP;ksj ?kksf'kr lacaf/kr izdj.ksa dk fuLrkj.k] djok;k tkuk vFkok jkT; ljdkj vuqHko izek.k i=ksa dk vfr ds i{k esa REPRESENTATION xaHkhjrkiwoZd iquZlR;kiu] varfje DECIDE ¼vH;kosnu fuLrkj.k½ p;u lwph ij izkIr ifjosnukvksa dk djus ds vkns"k ikfjr djk;k tkuk ifjosnuk fuLrkj.k lfefr ds ek/;e izLrkfor gSA bl gsrq Jheku ls fuLrkj.k djok;k tkuk vkfn egkf/koDrk egksn;] jktLFkku rFkk blesa yxus okys le; ds ljdkj ls jk; izkIr dj mudh jk; laca/k esa ekuuh; U;k;ky; dks ds vuqlkj dk;Zokgh fd;k tkuk rn~uqlkj voxr djok;k tkdj] izLrkfor gSA orZeku esa nk;j fjV ;kfpdkvksa dks izh&eSP;ksj ?kksf'kr djokus vFkok foHkkx ds i{k esa vH;kosnu fuLrkj.k ds vkns"k ikfjr djokus ds laca/k esa Jheku~ egkf/koDrk dks vuqjks/k fd;k tkus dk fu.kZ;

fy;k x;kA fy[ks tkus okys i= esa dk;Z ;kstuk oFkk vuqekfur le;&lhek dk Hkh mYys[k fd;k tk;sA

7. Mr. Singhvi, learned Advocate General has also pointed out to

the policy decisions taken for Item Nos. 32 to 44, which touch

various other issues, which are under adjudication before this

Court. The sum and substance of the report is that the State at

the decision making level is prepared to go into the whole issue

even when the recruitment process has culminated into a

provisional merit-list, which has been challenged by the

petitioners before this Court.

8. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that in case the

some of the petitioners may not have already filed the

representations before the State, there might be issues which

shall be deprived from the consideration by the respondents.

[2023:RJ-JD:39251] (35 of 38) [CW-14080/2023]

9. Learned counsel for the petitioners further submits that in

case the present petitions are disposed of while leaving it to the

policy decisions of the State, which has been brought on record

dated 03.11.2023, then appropriate protection may be granted to

the petitioners to approach this Court again in case need arises.

They also submit that any sudden declaration of the select

list/final selection list may also dampen the prospects of the

petitioners to get their rights remedied before this Hon'ble Court.

10. Learned counsel for the petitioners also submits that there

are previous orders of this Hon'ble Court, which may impact the

issues, which are involved before the Committee. Learned counsel

further submits that the respondents have to strictly abide by the

Rule 19 of the Rules of 1965 and any excess or non-application of

bonus marks have to be seriously dealt with while giving reasons.

11. Learned counsel for the petitioners further submits that the

petitioners have been seriously prejudiced by the available

provisional selection list for the recruitment of 25.04.2023 for the

purpose of Nursing Officer and other Paramedical Officers because

even when they have been discharging duties for long time

including the sensitive and critical period of bonus marks of the

Covid times they are not getting the desired benefit.

12. Mr. Singhvi, learned Advocate General assures this Court that

all the issues including the issue of bonus marks to the Covid

Health Assistant, which are within the realm of the policy, which

has been formulated on 03.11.2023 shall be looked into and

detailed orders after proper consideration shall be passed.

13. Mr. Singhvi, learned Advocate General further assures this

Court that once the appropriate consideration of the respondents

[2023:RJ-JD:39251] (36 of 38) [CW-14080/2023]

has been made, there still would be ample vacancies left in case

any select list is published for the purpose of purposive

adjudication of any remaining dispute. He also assures this Court

that each of the issues, particularly the items Nos.37, 39, 41 and

42 and also items Nos.32 to 44 shall be taken care of by the

experts and appropriate decision regarding the representations

and the grievances raised shall be taken.

14. Mr. Singhvi, learned Advocate General submits that it is the

prerogative of the State to conduct the selection process and while

being conscious of the prejudices, which have been generated out

of the advertisements dated 05.05.2023, 19.05.2023, 13.05.2023

& 13.06.2023, the State itself being the custodian of the selection

process has in its own wisdom decided to address each and every

issue which is before it and while revisiting such issues to make

appropriate considered decision without prejudice to any of the

decisions taken earlier.

15. Upon such submissions having been made and while keeping

into consideration the order passed by the Division Bench at Jaipur

of this Hon'ble Court in Bhanwar Kumar Bagaria (Supra) as

well as the assurances given by learned Advocate General, this

Court deems it appropriate to give the following directions :-

A. All the representations shall be properly organized by

the State to have a proper and elaborate consideration of

the same.

B. In case any of the petitioner has failed to file the

representation, it shall be open for the petitioner or any

other affected person by the advertisements for the

recruitment of Nursing and Paramedical Officers etc. to file

[2023:RJ-JD:39251] (37 of 38) [CW-14080/2023]

such representation within a period of 20 days from today

alongwith certified/web copy of this order.

C. Such representations shall be considered by the State

while keeping into consideration the policy decision taken

by the State on 03.11.2023 and the deliberations regarding

the issues in question.

D. The State shall be required to take a considered stand

on each of the broader controversy before publishing the

final select list, after considering the grievance raised in

such representations.

E. It shall be open for the petitioners to approach this Court

again after the State has applied its mind on the

representations and passed appropriate speaking orders

strictly in accordance with law.

F. The State shall strictly adhere to the Rule 19 of the Rules

of 1965 while deciding all these representations.

G. The decision taken by the State shall be uploaded on the

website.

H. In case any issue beyond the policy decision dated

03.11.2023 also remains, the petitioners shall be at liberty

to file representations within a period of 20 days from

today alongwith certified/web copy of this order, which shall

also be considered appropriately by the respondent-State.

I. In case the matters come back to this Court, it shall be

open for the both parties to raise all their issues as this

Court has not entered into the merits of the controversy

while passing today's order.

[2023:RJ-JD:39251] (38 of 38) [CW-14080/2023]

16. In view of the above, the present petitions are disposed of.

All pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of.

(DR.PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI),J

160-163, 167-169, 172-176, 178, 179, 183, 22 & C1-1 to C1-24-Jitender

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)