Amreek Ram vs State Of Rajasthan ...
2023 Latest Caselaw 5292 Raj

[2023/RJJD/017398]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 6164/2023

Amreek Ram S/o Sh. Bhuraram, Aged About 40 Years, W.no. 10, Maulavi Baas, Dabali Rathan, Teh. And Dist. Hanumangarh (Raj.). (At Present Lodged In Dist. Jail, Hanumangarh).

                                                                    ----Petitioner
                                     Versus




State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
                                                                  ----Respondent


For Petitioner(s)          :     Mr. R. Bhatnagar

For Respondent(s)          :     Mr. Arun Kumar, PP



              HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAY BISHNOI

                           Judgment / Order

25/05/2023

Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the

material on record.

The petitioner has been arrested in FIR No.277/2018 of

Police Station Sadar Hanumangarh, Distt. Hanumangarh for the

offences punishable under Sections 8/22 of the NDPS Act and

Section 18(C)/27(B)(II) of the Drugs and Cosmetics Act. He has

preferred this bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that as per

the prosecution story, 2490 tablets containing narcotic substance

tramadol weighing 382.5 gms were recovered at the instance of

[2023/RJJD/017398] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-6164/2023]

the petitioner. It is also submitted that the petitioner is in custody

since 4.11.2018 and the prosecution is required to examine 11

prosecution witnesses, out of which, only 1 witness has been

examined till date and trial of the case is likely to take time.

Learned counsel has placed reliance on the decision dated

28.03.2023 rendered by Hon'ble the Supreme Court in Mohd

Muslim @ Hussain Vs. State (NCT of Delhi) in Special Leave

Petition (Crl.) No(s).915 of 2023, wherein it is observed by the

Hon'ble Supreme Court that delay in trial can also be considered

for releasing accused person on bail despite the restrictions

imposed under Section 37 of the NDPS Act. Learned counsel for

the petitioner has submitted that in the light of the judgment

passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Mohd Muslim @ Hussain's

case (supra), the petitioner is entitled to be enlarged on bail.

Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application.

Having heard the learned counsel for the parties, after going

through the material available on record and in view of the

judgment passed by Hon'ble Supreme Court in Mohd Muslim @

Hussain's case (supra), without expressing any opinion on the

merits of the case, I deem it just and proper to grant bail to the

accused petitioner under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

Accordingly, this bail application filed under Section 439

Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is directed that petitioner - Amreek Ram

S/o Sh. Bhuraram shall be released on bail in connection with FIR

No.277/2018 of Police Station Sadar Hanumangarh, Distt.

Hanumangarh, provided he executes a personal bond in a sum of

Rs.1,00,000/- with two sound and solvent sureties of Rs.50,000/-

each to the satisfaction of learned trial court for his appearance

[2023/RJJD/017398] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-6164/2023]

before that court on each and every date of hearing and whenever

called upon to do so till the completion of the trial.

(VIJAY BISHNOI),J 52-msrathore/-

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)