Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 5199 Raj
Judgement Date : 24 May, 2023
[2023/RJJD/017188]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 3377/2021
1. Nand Singh Shekhawat S/o Shri Gopal Singh, Aged About 55 Years, R/o C/o Tehsil Office Rawatsar District - Hanumangarh (Raj.).
2. Bhoop Singh S/o Shri Sultan Singh, Aged About 53 Years, R/o Ward No. 30, Dhaka Colony, Near Pwd Rest House, Nohar District - Hanumangarh (Raj.).
----Petitioners Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary, Department Of Revenue (Group-7), Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur.
2. The District Collector, Hanumangarh District -
Hanumangarh (Raj.).
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. J.S. Bhaleria For Respondent(s) : Mr. Mrigraj Singh Rathore
JUSTICE DINESH MEHTA
Order
24/05/2023
1. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that in similar
circumstances and similar matters, the Division Bench of this
Court in The Director, Secondary Education, Rajasthan,
Bikaner Vs. Narendra Kumar Boolchandani & Ors.; D.B.
Special Appeal Writ No.362/2020 along with connected
matters, while considering the aspect that the issue in question
has arisen in large number of cases and the Government has
accepted the stand and granted the benefits, disposed of the
appeals with the following directions:-
[2023/RJJD/017188] (2 of 2) [CW-3377/2021]
"Learned counsel for the petitioners, however, submitted that the issue is arising in large number of cases and in several departments, the Government has accepted the stand and granted the benefits. If the petitioners are not granted similar benefits, it would amount to discriminatory treatment. Whatever be the grievance of the petitioners they can be resolved at the level of the administration or by the Court through bipartite hearing.
In view of the peculiar circumstances, these appeals are disposed of by permitting the Government to take into account the representations already made or to be filed by any of the petitioners within one month. In the process, the authorities will bear in mind the stand taken by the department in similar cases. Such representations would be decided in accordance with law unmindful of the observations and directions issued by the learned Single Judge in the impugned orders. Eventually, if the grievances of the petitioner still survive after the Government decision, it is open for the petitioners to seeks redressal thereafter in accordance with law."
2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the present
writ petition of the petitioners may also be disposed of in light of
the abovementioned judgment.
3. In view of the submissions made, the present writ petition is
disposed of with the same directions as issued by the Division
Bench of this Court in the case of Narendra Kumar
Boolchandani (supra).
4. The stay petition also stands disposed of.
(DINESH MEHTA),J 107-Mak/-
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!