Tejprakash vs The State Of Rajasthan ...
2023 Latest Caselaw 4516 Raj

[2023/RJJD/014946]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 6331/2023

1. Tejprakash S/o Nathuram, Aged About 32 Years, At Present Posted At Pandit Deendayal Upadhyay Medical College Churu, Rajasthan.

2. Sharmila D/o Phularam, Aged About 31 Years, At Present Posted At Pandit Deendayal Upadhyay Medical College Churu, Rajasthan.

3. Kanta Pharndiya W/o Vikram Lugriya, Aged About 31 Years, At Present Posted At Pandit Deendayal Upadhyay Medical College Churu, Rajasthan.

4. Indu Prajapat D/o Banwari Lal Prajapat, Aged About 32 Years, At Present Posted At Pandit Deendayal Upadhyay Medical College Churu, Rajasthan.

5. Mahafooj Khan S/o Maqsud Khan, Aged About 33 Years, At Present Posted At Pandit Deendayal Upadhyay Medical College Churu, Rajasthan.

6. Rachna D/o Jagdish Shyoran, Aged About 32 Years, At Present Posted At Pandit Deendayal Upadhyay Medical College Churu, Rajasthan.

7. Idrish Khan S/o Usman Gani Khan, Aged About 31 Years, At Present Posted At Pandit Deendayal Upadhyay Medical College Churu, Rajasthan.

8. Ramesh Kumar Lugriya S/o Banwari Lal, Aged About 32 Years, At Present Posted At Pandit Deendayal Upadhyay Medical College Churu, Rajasthan.

9. Hitesh Kumar Sharma S/o Satyanarayan Sharma, Aged About 32 Years, At Present Posted At Pandit Deendayal Upadhyay Medical College Churu, Rajasthan.

10. Shailendra Singh S/o Shardul Singh, Aged About 32 Years, At Present Posted At Pandit Deendayal Upadhyay Medical College Churu, Rajasthan.

11. Noushad Khan S/o Mohinudin Khan, Aged About 33 Years, At Present Posted At Pandit Deendayal Upadhyay Medical College Churu, Rajasthan.

12. Dinesh S/o Hukma Ram, Aged About 32 Years, At Present Posted At Pandit Deendayal Upadhyay Medical College Churu, Rajasthan.

13. Rajesh S/o Hardat Singh, Aged About 31 Years, At Present Posted At Pandit Deendayal Upadhyay Medical College Churu, Rajasthan.

14. Lokesh Prajapat S/o Hanuman Prasad, Aged About 33 Years, At Present Posted At Pandit Deendayal Upadhyay Medical College Churu, Rajasthan.

15. Rajkumar S/o Chandgiram, Aged About 32 Years, At Present Posted At Pandit Deendayal Upadhyay Medical College Churu, Rajasthan.

[2023/RJJD/014946] (2 of 5) [CW-6331/2023]

16. Navneet Singh S/o Rajaram Singh, Aged About 32 Years, At Present Posted At Pandit Deendayal Upadhyay Medical College Churu, Rajasthan.

17. Manish Kumar S/o Roopchand, Aged About 31 Years, At Present Posted At Pandit Deendayal Upadhyay Medical College Churu, Rajasthan.

18. Nitesh Kantiban S/o Rampratapkantiban, Aged About 32 Years, At Present Posted At Pandit Deendayal Upadhyay Medical College Churu, Rajasthan.

19. Manoj Kumar Prajapat S/o Arjun Lal, Aged About 33 Years, At Present Posted At Pandit Deendayal Upadhyay Medical College Churu, Rajasthan.

20. Mayank Kumar Mahich S/o Dungar Mal Mahich, Aged About 31 Years, At Present Posted At Pandit Deendayal Upadhyay Medical College Churu, Rajasthan.

21. Vikram Phagediya S/o Hemraj Phagediya, Aged About 33 Years, At Present Posted At Pandit Deendayal Upadhyay Medical College Churu, Rajasthan.

22. Kuldeep Singh S/o Ranveer Singh, Aged About 31 Years, At Present Posted At Pandit Deendayal Upadhyay Medical College Churu, Rajasthan.

23. Leelawati D/o Dhane Singh, Aged About 30 Years, At Present Posted At Pandit Deendayal Upadhyay Medical College Churu, Rajasthan.

24. Babulal S/o Udaram, Aged About 31 Years, At Present Posted At Pandit Deendayal Upadhyay Medical College Churu, Rajasthan.

25. Kavita D/o Magharam, Aged About 30 Years, At Present Posted At Pandit Deendayal Upadhyay Medical College Churu, Rajasthan.

26. Aarif S/o Mohammad Aamin, Aged About 32 Years, At Present Posted At Pandit Deendayal Upadhyay Medical College Churu, Rajasthan.

27. Leelawati D/o Jawaharlal, Aged About 31 Years, At Present Posted At Pandit Deendayal Upadhyay Medical College Churu, Rajasthan.

28. Mohammad Samir S/o Mumtaj Ali, Aged About 31 Years, At Present Posted At Pandit Deendayal Upadhyay Medical College Churu, Rajasthan.

29. Ravi Kumar S/o Ramkaran, Aged About 32 Years, At Present Posted At Pandit Deendayal Upadhyay Medical College Churu, Rajasthan.

30. Mamta Prajapat D/o Hariram Prajapat, Aged About 33 Years, At Present Posted At Pandit Deendayal Upadhyay Medical College Churu, Rajasthan.

31. Lakhendu Kumar S/o Heer Singh, Aged About 32 Years, At Present Posted At Pandit Deendayal Upadhyay Medical College Churu, Rajasthan.

[2023/RJJD/014946] (3 of 5) [CW-6331/2023]

32. Suman W/o Surendra Kumar, Aged About 31 Years, At Present Posted At Pandit Deendayal Upadhyay Medical College Churu, Rajasthan.

33. Ashok Kumar S/o Mahaveer Prasad, Aged About 32 Years, At Present Posted At Pandit Deendayal Upadhyay Medical College Churu, Rajasthan.

34. Sunita W/o Shankar Lal, Aged About 31 Years, At Present Posted At Pandit Deendayal Upadhyay Medical College Churu, Rajasthan.

35. Manish Kumar S/o Roopchand, Aged About 32 Years, At Present Posted At Pandit Deendayal Upadhyay Medical College Churu, Rajasthan.

36. Shivlal S/o Rameshwar Lal, Aged About 31 Years, At Present Posted At Pandit Deendayal Upadhyay Medical College Churu, Rajasthan.

37. Sandeep S/o Purushotam Lal, Aged About 32 Years, At Present Posted At Pandit Deendayal Upadhyay Medical College Churu, Rajasthan.

38. Shailendra Singh S/o Mahendra Singh, Aged About 31 Years, At Present Posted At Pandit Deendayal Upadhyay Medical College Churu, Rajasthan.

39. Vikas Rav S/o Shivbhagawan, Aged About 33 Years, At Present Posted At Pandit Deendayal Upadhyay Medical College Churu, Rajasthan.

40. Rahul S/o Sachinmorya, Aged About 31 Years, At Present Posted At Pandit Deendayal Upadhyay Medical College Churu, Rajasthan.

41. Rajesh S/o Harduttsingh, Aged About 33 Years, At Present Posted At Pandit Deendayal Upadhyay Medical College Churu, Rajasthan.

42. Ravi Kumar S/o Ramkishan, Aged About 32 Years, At Present Posted At Pandit Deendayal Upadhyay Medical College Churu, Rajasthan.

43. Sandeep Kumar S/o Sultana Ram, Aged About 31 Years, At Present Posted At Pandit Deendayal Upadhyay Medical College Churu, Rajasthan.

----Petitioners Versus

1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Medical And Health Department, Government Of Rajasthan Secretariat, Jaipur.

2. Director, (Public Health) Medical And Health Service, Rajasthan Swasthya Bhawan, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.

3. Principal And Controller, Pandit Deen Dayal Upadhyay Medical College, Churu.

4. Chief Medical And Health Officer, Churu, Distt. Churu.

5. Banti Tradding Company, Ward No. 30, Churu, District

[2023/RJJD/014946] (4 of 5) [CW-6331/2023]

Churu Through Its Authorised Signatory.

----Respondents

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vikram Singh Bhawla

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINIT KUMAR MATHUR

Order

12/05/2023

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the

petitioners would feel satisfied if a direction be issued to consider

their representation in the light of judgment dated 20.03.2017

rendered by this Court in a bunch of writ petitions led by Pankaj

Kumar Upadhyay & Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors.: S.B. Civil

Writ Petition No. 953/2017.

In view of the aforesaid, the present writ petition is disposed

of with a direction to the petitioners to file a representation within

a period of four weeks from today.

In case, a representation is so addressed within the aforesaid

period, the respondents shall consider and decide the same in

accordance with law including the law laid down by this Court in

the case of Pankaj Kumar Upadhyay (supra); however, in no case

later than six weeks from the date of receipt of the representation.

It is made clear that aforesaid direction to decide the

representation has been issued only with a view to ensure

expeditious redressal of petitioners' grievance. The same may not

be construed to be an order to decide the representation in a

particular manner.

The stay application also stands disposed of accordingly.

[2023/RJJD/014946] (5 of 5) [CW-6331/2023]

The order has been passed based on the submissions made

in the petition, the respondents would be free to examine the

veracity of the submissions made in the petition and only in case,

the averments made therein are found to be correct, the

petitioners would be entitled to the relief.

(VINIT KUMAR MATHUR),J 73-/Vivek/-

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)