Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 3821 Raj
Judgement Date : 1 May, 2023
[2023/RJJD/012840]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 3058/2023
Vijendra Singh S/o Shri Darshan Singh, Aged About 31 Years, Chak 52 GG (Gulabewall), Tehsil Srikaranpur, District Sri Ganganagar (Presently Constable No. 1558, Under Suspension Headquarters Reserve Police Line Sri Ganganagar).
----Petitioner Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary, Department Of Home Affairs, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur.
2. The Superintendent Of Police, Sri Ganganagar.
----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. N.R. Budania
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINIT KUMAR MATHUR
Order
01/05/2023
This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner aggrieved
against the order dated 04.11.2022 (Annex.1), whereby the
petitioner has been placed under suspension.
It is, inter alia, indicating that already challan against the
petitioner has been filed and despite passage of sufficiently long
time, the petitioner has not been reinstated and, therefore, the
order of suspension requires review and the petitioner deserves to
be reinstated.
The petitioner with reference to judgment in Manvendra
Singh v. State of Raj. & Ors.: SBCW No. 4276/2018, decided on
21.12.2018 submitted that the Court in the said judgment has
dealt with the powers of the disciplinary authority under Rule 13
(5) of the Rules of 1958 and appellate authority under Rule 22 of
[2023/RJJD/012840] (2 of 2) [CW-3058/2023]
the Rules of 1958 and has held that the various circulars issued by
the State Government laying down limitation to examine the
revocation of suspension order after a period of three years from
the date of suspension/after a period of one year from the date,
the charge-sheet has been filed, was not justified and it was open
for the authorities to examine the case for revocation of
suspension even prior to the said periods fixed in the circular.
In the over all facts & circumstances of the case as projected
as well as the law laid down by this Court in the case of
Manvendra Singh (supra), the writ petition filed by the petitioner
is disposed of, the disciplinary authority is directed to decide the
representation to be made by the petitioner in light of the
judgment in the case of Manvendra Singh (supra).
The needful may be done by the respondents within a period
of four weeks from the date a copy of this order is placed by the
petitioner.
The order has been passed based on the submissions made
in the petition, the respondents would be free to examine the
veracity of the submissions made in the petition and only in case,
the averments made therein are found to be correct, the petitioner
would be entitled to the relief.
(VINIT KUMAR MATHUR),J 88-/Vivek/-
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!