Thursday, 07, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Smt. Badam Devi Gurjar vs State Of Rajasthan ...
2023 Latest Caselaw 3786 Raj

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 3786 Raj
Judgement Date : 1 May, 2023

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur
Smt. Badam Devi Gurjar vs State Of Rajasthan ... on 1 May, 2023
Bench: Pushpendra Singh Bhati
[2023/RJJD/012848]

      HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
                       JODHPUR
                 S.B. Writ Misc Application No. 40/2023

                                         In

                  S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.5008/2022

Smt. Badam Devi Gurjar W/o Shri Raju Lal, Aged About 44
Years, B/c Gurjar (Sbc/mbc), R/o Pander, Tehsil Jahazpur, District
Bhilwara. Presently Working As Cook In Govt. Ambedkar Boys
Hostel Pander, District Bhilwara.
                                                                        ----Petitioner
                                        Versus
1.       State    Of   Rajasthan,        Through         The       Secretary,   Social
         Welfare Department, Rajasthan, Jaipur.
2.       The Director, Social Welfare Department, Jaipur.
3.       The     Assistant       Director,     Social      Welfare      Department,
         Bhilwara.
                                                                    ----Respondents


For Petitioner(s)            :     Mr. Mahipaal Rajpurohit
For Respondent(s)            :     Mr. Anil Kumar Gaur, AAG



      HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI

                                        Order

01/05/2023

1.    The present misc. application has been preferred by the

petitioner seeking correction / modification in the order dated

30.01.2023 passed by this Court in S.B. Civil Writ Petition

No.5008/2022.

2.    For the reasons mentioned in the application, the same is

allowed and the order dated 30.01.2023 passed by this Court in

the present writ petition is substituted by the following order :

      "Learned       counsel      for    the     parties      jointly    submit    the

controversy is covered by the order passed by a coordinate Bench


                       (Downloaded on 03/05/2023 at 10:02:57 PM)
 [2023/RJJD/012848]                           (2 of 4)                               [WMAP-40/2023]



of this Hon'ble Court in Mohan Lal Vs. State (S.B. Civil Writ Petition

No.3386/2003) on 22.12.2006. The order reads as follows:

            "Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as
      learned Dy. Government Advocate.
            Learned counsel for the petitioner has argued that in
      spite of the specific order passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court,
      the respondents have failed to regularize services of the
      petitioner. According to the petitioner, he was appointed as
      cook with the respondent no.3 in the month of July, 1993 on
      consolidated salary of Rs.350/-, which was later increased to
      Rs.600/-. He was required to prepare food for the inmates in
      the hostel. This Court in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.3453/1994-
      Anshkalin      Samaj       Kalyan     Sangh,       Banswara         Vs.      State    of
      Rajasthan & Ors decided on 26th May, 1995 directed the
      respondents to make payment of salary of the cook working
      with the various hostels run by Social Welfare Department.
      Benefit of this judgment was also directed to be extended to all
      those who were in service on the date of passing of the
      aforesaid    order.      The     aforesaid     writ   petition      was       filed   on
      25.7.1994 and since the petitioner was appointed in July, 1993,
      the judgment is applicable to his case also. Appeal preferred
      by the State Government against the aforesaid judgment dated
      26.5.1995 being D.B. Civil Special Appeal No.595/1995 was
      also dismissed. Hon'ble Supreme Court gave direction to the
      State Government for regularization of the services of the
      members of the petitioner association as per the scheme submitted
      by    the      State       before      the        Hon'ble    Supreme             Court.
      Learned counsel for the petitioner provided copy of the order
      passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Special Leave to
      Appeal      (Civil)       No.21173/1994,           decided         on        29.3.1996.
      According to the said order, there will be 316 employees for
      consideration in the first phase who have completed five years
      of service. There will be 459 part time workers who have not
      completed       five      years.      After    determination            of     seniority
      according to length of service 152 employees who have
      completed two years but else than five years will be regularized
      in second phase, the rest 307 persons will be regularized in
      third phase. The process of preparation of seniority list will be
      completed by 30th April, 1996 and thereafter the process of

                             (Downloaded on 03/05/2023 at 10:02:57 PM)
 [2023/RJJD/012848]                        (3 of 4)                        [WMAP-40/2023]


      regularization will start. The process of regularization in the
      first phase will be completed upto 15th August, 1993 and order
      shall be issued by 30.9.1996.
            The respondents in their reply to the writ petition in para
      no.2 although did not dispute that the case of the petitioner
      would be covered at least in the group whose services were to be
      regularized in third phase w.e.f. 1st April, 1998 but in para
      no.2 of the reply it has been stated that in view of the
      instructions issued by the Hon'ble Supreme Court the matter of
      the petitioner has been forwarded to the Screening committee
      of the Department, Directorate, Jaipur.
            In   view    of    the      authoritative   pronouncement        of    the
      Hon'ble Supreme Court it hardly needs to be stated that the
      judgment passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court would be
      binding on all the concerned and therefore there can be no
      question of any further approval being procured from any
      authority even the Government.
            In   the    result,   the     writ   petition    is allowed   and      the
      petitioner is held entitled to regularization w.e.f. 1st April, 1998
      in terms of the aforesaid judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme
      Court. The respondents are directed to make compliance of
      this judgment within a period of three months from the date of
      service/receipt of this judgment and should make payment of
      all consequential benefits to the petitioner together with interest @
      6% per annum.
            There shall be no order as to costs."

      In light of the aforesaid order, the present petition is allowed

in the same terms. The petitioner is held entitled to regularization,

with effect from the date of commencement of his phase, in terms

of the judgment of the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of State of

Rajasthan Vs. Mod Singh (SLP(C) No.21173/1994, decided

on   29.03.1996).         The        respondents            are   directed        to     make

compliance of this judgment within a period of three months from

the date of service/receipt of this judgment and should make

payment of all consequential benefits to the petitioner together

with interest @ 6% per annum.

                         (Downloaded on 03/05/2023 at 10:02:57 PM)
                                    [2023/RJJD/012848]                   (4 of 4)                    [WMAP-40/2023]



                                         All pending applications stand disposed of."

                                         The aforementioned order dated 30.01.2023 shall be read

                                   accordingly.

                                                                (DR. PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI), J.

199-Zeeshan

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter