Bhupendra Kumar Rao vs State Of Rajasthan ...
2023 Latest Caselaw 2582 Raj

[2023/RJJD/008250]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 3894/2023

Bhupendra Kumar Rao S/o Late Shri Jagdish Chandra Rao, Aged About 60 Years, House R/o No. 2250, Vishnu Marg, Gangori Bazar, Jaipur, Rajasthan.

----Petitioner Versus

1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Chief Secretary, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur.

2. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary Department Of Personnel And Training Government Secretariat, Jaipur.

3. The Deputy Secretary, Department Of Administrative Reforms (Group-3), Secretariat, Jaipur.

4. The Director, State Insurance And Provident Fund Department, Rajasthan, Jaipur.

                                                                      ----Respondents


For Petitioner(s)               :    Mr. Hans Raj Nimbar
For Respondent(s)               :

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINIT KUMAR MATHUR

Order

29/03/2023

1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in similar

circumstances and similar matters, the Division Bench of this

Court in The Director, Secondary Education, Rajasthan,

Bikaner Vs. Narendra Kumar Boolchandani & Ors.; D.B.

Special Appeal Writ No.362/2020 along with connected

matters, while considering the aspect that the issue in question

has arisen in large number of cases and the Government has

[2023/RJJD/008250] (2 of 2) [CW-3894/2023]

accepted the stand and granted the benefits, disposed of the

appeals with the following directions:-

"Learned counsel for the petitioners, however, submitted that the issue is arising in large number of cases and in several departments, the Government has accepted the stand and granted the benefits. If the petitioners are not granted similar benefits, it would amount to discriminatory treatment. Whatever be the grievance of the petitioners they can be resolved at the level of the administration or by the Court through bipartite hearing. In view of the peculiar circumstances, these appeals are disposed of by permitting the Government to take into account the representations already made or to be filed by any of the petitioners within one month. In the process, the authorities will bear in mind the stand taken by the department in similar cases. Such representations would be decided in accordance with law unmindful of the observations and directions issued by the learned Single Judge in the impugned orders. Eventually, if the grievances of the petitioner still survive after the Government decision, it is open for the petitioners to seeks redressal thereafter in accordance with law."

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the present writ

petition of the petitioner may also be disposed of in light of the

abovementioned judgment.

3. In view of the submissions made, the present writ petition is

disposed of with the same directions as issued by the Division

Bench of this Court in the case of Narendra Kumar

Boolchandani (supra).

(VINIT KUMAR MATHUR),J 68-/Vivek/-

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)