Friday, 08, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Asian Institute Of Veterinary ... vs State Of Rajasthan ...
2023 Latest Caselaw 2111 Raj

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 2111 Raj
Judgement Date : 8 March, 2023

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur
Asian Institute Of Veterinary ... vs State Of Rajasthan ... on 8 March, 2023
Bench: Pushpendra Singh Bhati

[2023/RJJD/006307] (1 of 3) [CW-3328/2023]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 3328/2023

Asian Institute Of Veterinary Science, Khatushyam Ji Road, Ringus, Sikar, Rajasthan Being Run And Managed By Shri Shyam Shikshan Sansthan, B-6, Jamunapuri, Murlipura Scheme, Jaipur Through Its Secretary Vishal Mahala S/o Bhagirath Singh Mahala, Aged About 47 Years, R/o B-6, Jamnapuri, Murlipura, Jaipur, Rajasthan.

----Petitioner Versus

1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Director, Animal Husbandry Department, Jaipur.

2. Deputy Secretary To The Government, Department Of Animal Husbandry, Secretariat, Jaipur.

3. Rajasthan University Of Veterinary And Animal Sciences, Bikaner Through Its Registrar.

----Respondents

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Dinesh Kumar Saini (Member of the Society, present in person).

For Respondent(s) :

HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI

Order

08/03/2023

The lawyers are abstaining from the work.

The Member of the Society present in person submits that

the controversy involved in the present writ petition has already

been decided by a Coordinate Bench of this Court in the case of

Professor S Karan Shiksha Samiti Vs. State of Rajasthan &

Ors. (S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.24692/2018 decided on

09.04.2019).

[2023/RJJD/006307] (2 of 3) [CW-3328/2023]

The Member of the Society present in person further submits

that the aforesaid view was taken by this Court in the light of the

adjudication by a Constitution Bench of the Apex Court of the land

in the case of Islamic Academy of Education Vs. State of

Karnataka : 2003 (6) SCC 679, which reads thus:

"25. Privately managed educational institutions imparting professional education in the fields of (33) medicine, dentistry and engineering have spurted in the last few decades. The right of the minorities to establish an institution of their own choice in terms of clause(1) of Article 30 of the Constitution of India is recognized; so is the right of a citizen who intends to establish an institution under Article 19(1)(g) thereof. However, the fundamental right of a citizen to establish an educational institution and in particular a professional institution is not absolute. These rights are subject to regulations and laws imposing reasonable restrictions. Such reasonable restriction in public interest can be imposed under Clause (6) of Article 19 and regulations under Article 30 of the Constitution of India. The right to establish an educational institution, although guaranteed under the Constitution, recognition of affiliation is not. Recognition or affiliation of professional institution must be in terms of statute."

The Member of the Society present in person also submits

that the petitioner-institution would be satisfied if representation,

which the petitioner-institution would be filing before the

respondents within a period of fifteen days from today, is ordered

to be considered in the light of the judgment passed by the

Coordinate Bench at Jaipur in case of Professor S Karan

Shiksha Samiti Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. (S.B. Civil Writ

Petition No.24692/2018 decided on 09.04.2019).

In view of submissions made by the Member of the Society

present in person, the petitioner-institution may file a

[2023/RJJD/006307] (3 of 3) [CW-3328/2023]

representation along with a copy of the above referred order dated

09.04.2019 and a certified copy of the order instant within a

period of two weeks from today.

In case representation is so addressed, the respondents shall

consider and decide the representation, in accordance with law

preferably within a period of two months from receipt of the

representation.

It is made clear that aforesaid direction to decide the

representation has been issued only with a view to ensure

expeditious redressal of petitioner-institution's grievance. The

same may not be construed to be an order to decide the

representation in a particular manner.

The writ petition so also the stay application stand disposed

of accordingly.

(DR.PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI), J 72-/Jitender//-

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter