Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 778 Raj
Judgement Date : 20 January, 2023
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1162/2023
1. Sayar Singh Bhati S/o Nathu Ram, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Kitalsar, Post Kitalsar, Teh. And Ps Degana, Dist. Nagaur, Fc 978 Jaisalmer.
2. Ram Kumar S/o Omprakash, Aged About 30 Years, R/o 25 Ptd, Post Bisanpura , Teh. Raisinghnagar, Ps Smeja Kothi, Dis. Shree Ganganagar, Fc 970 Jaisalmer, Present Fc 702 Hanumangarh.
3. Narendra Meena S/o Sita Ram Meena, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Hastganj, Post Chauth Ka Barwara, Teh. Chauth Ka Barwara, Ps Chauth Ka Barwara, Dis. Sawai Madhopur, Fc 2028 Jaisalmer.
4. Pradeep Kumar S/o Hanuman Singh, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Mammar Khera, Post Morjand Khari, Teh. Sadulsahar, Ps Lalgarh Jattan Dis. Shree Ganganagar, Fc 2002 Jaisalmer
5. Bhagwana Ram Jangu S/o Choka Ram, Aged About 34 Years, R/o Dhundhwalo Ki Dhani, Post Alay, Teh. Nagaur, Ps Shree Balaji, Dis. Nagaur, Fc 948 Jaisalmer.
6. Rakesh Kumar S/o Bhanwra Ram, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Beri Kallan, Post Beri Kallan, Teh. Didwana, Ps Molasar, Dis. Nagaur, Fc 952 Jaisalmer
7. Ajay Singh S/o Dhiraj Singh, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Devlen, Post Devlen, Teh. Todabhim, Ps Balghat, Dis. Karouli, Fc 968 Jaisalmer.
8. Kuldeep Singh S/o Jagdev Singh, Aged About 31 Years, R/o Kamana, Post Kamana, Teh. Hanumangrh, Ps Sader, Dis. Hanumangarh, Fc 994 Jaisalmer.
9. Nema Ram Bijarniya S/o Bhoma Ram, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Dediya Ka Bas, Post Minda, Teh. Nawa City , Ps Maroth, Dis. Nagaur, Fc 953 Jaisalmer.
10. Kheta Ram S/o Khangar Ram, Aged About 31 Years, R/o Kathora, Post Rama, Teh. Fatehgarh, Ps Sangad, Dis. Jaisalmer, Fc 965 Jaisalmer.
11. Narapat S/o Shaitana Ram, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Lathi, Post Lathi, Teh. Pokaran, Ps Lathi, Dis. Jaisalmer, Fc 981 Jaisalmer.
12. Narpat Ram S/o Lakha Ram, Aged About 33 Years, R/o Jethwai, Post Baramsar, Teh. Jaisalmer And Ps Sader, Dis. Jaisalmer, Fc 2023 Jaisalmer.
13. Aadu Ram S/o Pokar Ram, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Meghrikhsar, Post Pannasar, Teh. And Ps Bhaniyana, Dis. Jaisalmer, Fc 2004 Jaisalmer.
14. Dinesh Kumer Heengra S/o Moti Ram Heengra, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Achalpura, Post Loona Khurd, Teh. Bhaniyana, Ps Sankra, Dis. Jaisalmer, Fc 2005 Jaisalmer.
15. Jayprakash S/o Heera Ram, Aged About 30 Years, R/o
(2 of 4) [CW-1162/2023]
Ridmalnagar, Post Bhojakor, Teh. Dechu , Ps Lohawat, Dis. Jodhpur, Fc 950 Jaisalmer.
16. Om Prakash S/o Bheenya Ram, Aged About 31 Years, R/o Meghrikhsar, Post Pannasar, Teh. And Ps Bhaniyana, Dis. Jaisalmer, Fc 971 Jaisalmer.
17. Prem Kumar Leelad S/o Narna Ram Leelad, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Hardaspura, Post Bonada, Teh. Pokran And Ps Sankada, Dis. Jaisalmer, Fc 997 Jaisalmer.
18. Kamal Ram S/o Gena Ram, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Sam, Post Sam, Teh. And Ps Sam, Dis. Jaisalmer, Fc 996 Jaisalmer.
19. Surendra Kumar S/o Dhunkal Ram, Aged About 36 Years, R/o. Likhmisar, Post Likhmisar, Teh. And Ps Pilibangan, Dis. Hanumangrh, Fc 983 Jaisalmer.
20. Jitendra Inkhiya S/o Harchand Ram, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Serawa, Post Sonu, Teh. Jaisalmer, Ps Ramgarh, Dis. Jaisalmer, Fc 964 Jaisalmer.
21. Krishan Kumar S/o Beenja Ram, Aged About 31 Years, R/ o Goliya Kalan, Post Bhedana, Teh. And Ps Gudamalani, Dis. Barmer, Fc 973 Jaisalmer.
22. Parveen Kumar S/o Jagmal, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Ward No. 62 Gurunanak Basti, Post Ganganagar , Teh. Ganganagar Ps Jawhar Nagar, Dis. Shree Ganganagar , Fc 982 Jaisalmer.
23. Rakesh Kumar Meena S/o Ummed Meena, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Sadpura, Post Dadanpur, Teh. And Ps Todabhim, Dis. Karauli, Fc 2032 Jaisalmer.
24. Suresh Kumar Meena S/o Shankar Lal Meena, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Srinagr, Post Ranipura, Teh. And Ps Nagar Fort, Dis. Tonk, Fc 2019 Jaisalmer.
25. Ram Singh Meena S/o Yaad Ram Meena, Aged About 31 Years, R/o Devrajpur, Post Bichgaon, Teh. And Ps Lachhmangarh, Ps , Dis. Alwar, Fc 2020 Jaisalmer.
26. Rakesh Kumar Meena S/o Prahlad Singh Meena, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Saraikalan, Post Saraikalan, Teh. And Ps Mundawar, Dis. Alwar, Fc 963 Jaisalmer.
27. Mamraj Meena S/o Prahalad Sahai Meena, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Bidara, Tehsil Shahpura, P.s. Shahpura , Dis. Jaipur, Fc 2013 Jaisalmer.
28. Shiv Ram Meena S/o Arjun Lal Meena, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Ganwadi, Post Mohanpura, Teh. Todabhim, Ps Balghat, Dis.karauli, Fc 2030 Jaisalmer.
29. Sarwan Kumar S/o Sardara Ram, Aged About 33 Years, R/o Ramgarh, Post Ramgarh, Teh. Jaisalmer , Psramgarh, Dis. Jaisalmer, Fc 991 Jaisalmer.
30. Sita Ram S/o Gyana Ram, Aged About 34 Years, R/o Toshina, Post Toshina, Teh. Deedwana , Ps Khunkhuna, Dis. Nagaur, Fc 988 Jaisalmer.
31. Rana Ram S/o Harchand Ram, Aged About 33 Years, R/o
(3 of 4) [CW-1162/2023]
Awaya, Post Awaya, Teh. Pokaran , Ps Nachana, Dis. Jaisalmer, Fc 2022 Jaisalmer.
32. Harish Kumar S/o Nakhata Ram, Aged About 30 Years, R/ o Leela Parewar, Post Parewar, Teh. Jaisalmer , Ps Ramgarh, Dis. Jaisalmer, Fc 958 Jaisalmer.
33. Deepa Ram S/o Nakhata Ram, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Leela Parewar, Post Parewar, Teh. Jaisalmer , Ps Ramgarh, Dis. Jaisalmer, Fc 955 Jaisalmer.
34. Vijay S/o Bhagirath, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Chak 16 Rwd, Post Topriyan, Teh. Nohar, Ps Rawatsar, Dis. Hanumangrh, Fc 945 Jaisalmer.
35. Nemee Chand S/o Ganapat Ram, Aged About 45 Years, R/o New Housing Board, Ps Kotwali, The And Dis. Jhunjhunu, Fc 2050 Jaisalmer.
----Petitioners Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Home Secretary, Secretariat, Rajasthan, Jaipur.
2. The Director General Of Police, Police Head Quarter, Jaipur.
3. Inspector General Of Police, Jodhpur Range, Jodhpur.
4. The Superintendent Of Police, Jaisalmer.
5. The Superintendent Of Police, Hanumangarh.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. C.R.Choudhary
JUSTICE DINESH MEHTA
Order
20/01/2023
1. It is submitted by the counsel for the petitioners that the
issue raised in the present writ petition is covered by the
judgment in Dara Singh v. State of Rajasthan & Ors. : S.B. Civil
Writ Petition No.11973/2012, decided on 17.12.2012.
2. In the case of Dara Singh (supra), a coordinate Bench of this
Court, inter alia, directed as under:
"Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that realizing the mistake, appointment has been given, thus, grievance of petitioner to the extent is redressed,
(4 of 4) [CW-1162/2023]
but appointment should have been made effective from the date candidates lesser in merit were given appointment with notional benefits.
In view of the prayer made and taking note of the order dated 13.12.2012 whereby petitioner is given appointment realizing mistake by the respondents, I consider it proper to direct that aforesaid appointment should be treated from the date when lesser meritorious candidates were given. The petitioner would, accordingly, be entitled to the notional benefits and seniority from the date persons with less merit were given appointment. The actual benefits would be allowed from the date of joining pursuant to the order dated 13.12.2012.
With the aforesaid, writ petition stands disposed of."
3. In view of the submissions made, the writ petition
filed by the petitioners is disposed of with similar directions
to the respondents No.3 & 4 as given in the case of Dara
Singh (supra).
4. The order has been passed based on the submissions
made in the petition, the respondents would be free to
examine the veracity of the submissions made in the
petition and only in case, the averments made therein are
found to be correct, the petitioners would be entitled to the
relief.
5. The stay application also stands disposed of
accordingly.
(DINESH MEHTA),J 231-akansha/-
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!