Hans Kumar Sharma S/O Late Mr. ... vs State Of Rajasthan
2023 Latest Caselaw 740 Raj/2

 HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
             BENCH AT JAIPUR

  S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 637/2020

Hans Kumar Sharma S/o Late Mr. Mohan Lal Sharma,
Aged About 45 Years, R/o 107, Maan Vihar, Tonk
Road, Jaipur (Rajasthan)
                                                         ----Petitioner
                                Versus
1.     State     Of     Rajasthan,          Through       Its   Public
       Prosecutor, High Court Campus, Jan Path Jaipur
       (Rajasthan)
2.     Manu Sharma @manu Sahu D/o Nank Chand,
       Aged About 43 Years, Resident Of 43/54/11-12,
       Second Floor, Varun Path Mansarover Jaipur
       302020 (Rajasthan)
                                                     ----Respondents

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ratan Kaushik For : Mr. Babulal Nasuna, PP Respondent(s)

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS

Order

23/01/2023

;[email protected];qDr dh vksj ls /kkjk 482 n.M izfdz;k lafgrk ds rgr ;g ;kfpdk mldh iRuh vFkkZr ifjokfn;k dh vksj ls iqfyl Fkkuk&ekuljksoj] t;iqj esa ntZ izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k [email protected] vijk/k vUrxZr /kkjk 498, Hkk-na-la- dks fujLr fd;s tkus dh izkFkZuk ds lkFk is'k dh gSA fo}ku vf/koDrk ;kph dk fuosnu gS fd ifjokfn;k }kjk izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ esa yxk;s x;s vkjksi fujk/kkj gSa] blds

(2 of 5) [CRLMP-637/2020]

vykok ifjokfn;k dh vksj ls /kkjk 9 fgUnw fookg vf/kfu;e ds rgr ikfjokfjd U;k;ky; esa yafcr dk;Zokgh esa ;g mYysf[kr fd;k gS fd og vius ifr ds lkFk jguk pkgrh gS rFkk ngst ds fy, dwzjrk vkfn ds laca/k esa tks vkjksi yxk;s gSa] vfHkifjR;kx djrh gSA mudk fuosnu gS fd mijksDr dk;Zokgh ds ek/;e ls vkjksiksa dks okfil fy;s tkus ds vk/kkj ij vc ;g vkijkf/kd dk;Zokgh yafcr j[kk tkuk fof/kd izfdz;k dk nq:i;ksx gS rFkk fuosnu fd;k fd iqfyl us iwoZ esa fookn rqPN izd`fr o ikfjokfjd fookn ekuk gS] vr% bl vk/kkj ij gLrxr izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ ds vk/kkj ij lafLFkr vkijkf/kd dk;Zokgh dks fujLr fd;s tkus dk fuosnu fd;kA blds foijhr fo}ku yksd vfHk;sktd dk fuosnu gS fd vfHk;qDr rFkk ifjokfn;k ds e/; dksbZ jkthukek vkijkf/kd U;k;ky; esa gqvk gks] ,slh fLFkfr ugha gSA izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ esa yxk;s x;s vkjksiksa ds vk/kkj ij laKs; vijk/k ds rRo izdV gks jgs gSaA mudk ;g Hkh fuosnu gS fd bl ekeys esa vfHk;qDr ds fo:) vkjksi fojfpr fd;s tk pqds gSa] vr% vc izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ vFkok mlds vk/kkj ij lafLFkr dk;Zokgh dks fujLr fd;s tkus dk dksbZ vkSfpR; ugha gS] rnuqlkj mUgksaus ;kfpdk [kkfjt fd;s tkus dk fuosnu fd;kA fo}ku vf/koDrk vfHk;qDr dh vksj ls izLrqr U;kf;d n`"VkUr LVsV vkWQ gfj;k.kk cuke Hktuyky o vU; ¼1992½ ,l-lh-lh- ¼fdzfeuy½ 426 esa ;g O;oLFkk izfrikfnr dh gS fd tgka dfFkr izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ fof/kd izfdz;k dk

(3 of 5) [CRLMP-637/2020]

nq:i;ksx gks rks viokfnd ekeyks esa ,slh izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ dks fujLr fd;k tk ldrk gSA blds foijhr ekuuh; loksZPp U;k;ky; }kjk 2022 SCC OnLine SC 820 State of Uttar Pradesh and Anrs. Vs. Akhil

Sharda and Ors with Sanjeet Jaiswal Vs. State of Uttar

Pradesh and Ors. ds iSjk la[;k*07 esa ;g fl)kar izfrikfnr fd;k x;k gS%&

"7.Having gone through the impugned judgment and order passed by the High Court by which the High Court has set aside the criminal proceedings in exercise of powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C., it appears that the High Court has virtually conducted a mini trial, which as such is not permissible at this stage and while deciding the application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. As observed and held by this Court in a catena of decisions no mini trial can be conducted by the High Court in exercise of powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C. jurisdiction and at the stage of deciding the application under Section 482 Cr.P.C., the High Court cannot get into appreciation of evidence of the particular case being considered."

blh izdkj ekuuh; loksZPp U;k;ky; }kjk ¼2002½ 1 ,l- lh-lh- 555 deyknsoh vxzoky cuke LVsV vkWQ osLV caxky o vU; ds iSjk la[;k&7 esa ;g O;oLFkk izfrikfnr dh x;h gS fd& "This Court has consistently held that the revisional or inherent powers of quashing the proceedings at the initial stage should be

(4 of 5) [CRLMP-637/2020]

exercised sparingly and only where the allegations made in the complaint or the FIR, even if taken it at the face value and accepted in entirety, do not prima facie disclose the commission of an offence. Disputed and controversial facts cannot be made the basis for the exercise of the jurisdiction"

gLrxr ekeys esa fgUnq fookg vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 9 ds rgr yafcr dk;Zokgh esa dfFkr :i ls ifjokfn;k }kjk vius vkjksiksa dk vfHkR;kx djrs gq, vius ifr ds lkFk jgus dh bPNk izdV dh gS] fdUrq og ;kfpdk dc] fdu ifjfLFkfr;ksa esa izLrqr gqbZ gS vkSj mlds mn~ns'; D;k jgs gSa] ;g fopkj.k dk fo"k; gSA vfHk;qDr }kjk fy;k x;k ;g cpko fopkj.k ds laca/k esa lqlaxr gks ldrk gSA izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ vFkok mlds vk/kkj ij vkijkf/kd dk;Zokgh dks mUgha viokfnd ekeyksa esa fujLr fd;k tk ldrk gS tc Li"Vr% U;kf;d izfdz;k dk nq:i;ksx gks vFkok izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ esa dksbZ laKs; vijk/k ds rRo izdV ugha gksrs gksaA gLrxr ekeys esa ngst dh ekax dks ysdj dwzjrk dk O;ogkj vfHk;qDr }kjk fd;s tkus dk vkjksi Li"V :i ls izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ esa vafdr gSaA U;k;ky; }kjk fnukad 28-11-2014 dks miyC/k lkexzh ds vk/kkj ij izlaKku fy;k tk pqdk gSA mlds i'pkr vfHk;qDr dks vkns'k fnukad 24-11-2015 ds ek/;e ls /kkjk 498, Hkk-na-la- ds vkjksi ls vkjksfir Hkh fd;k tk pqdk gSA bl izdkj /kkjk 482 n.M izfdz;k lafgrk ds rgr {ks=kf/kdkfjrk dk iz;ksx gLrxr ekeys esa fd;k tkuk U;k;ksfpr

(5 of 5) [CRLMP-637/2020]

izrhr ugha gksrk gS vkSj izLrqr ;g ;kfpdk [kkfjt gksus ;ksX; gSA ifj.kker% ;g ;kfpdk [kkfjt dh tkrh gS] LFkxu izkFkZuk i= Hkh mDr izdkj ls vLohdkj fd;k tkrk gSA

(UMA SHANKER VYAS),J

Mittal/49

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)