Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 601 Raj/2
Judgement Date : 17 January, 2023
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 1990/2022
Damodar Son Of Badrilal, Resident Of Lalgah, Police Station
Sandwa, District Churu (Raj)
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. R.R. Gurjar
For Respondent(s) : Mr. M.S. Saini, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FARJAND ALI
Order
17/01/2023
By way of filing the instant revision petition, challenge has
been made to the order dated 28.09.2022 passed by learned
Additional District and Sessions Judge No.1, Kekri which arose out
of FIR No.182/2022 registered at Police Station Bhinai, Distt.
Ajmer for the offence under Section 8/18 of NDPS Act, 1985.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he is the
owner of the vehicle in question i.e. Swift Car bearing registration
No.RJ-CA-9139, which has been seized by the Police Officers. He
submits that the petitioner being the owner of the vehicle in
question, is the person best entitled to get back the possession of
the seized property. There is no other person claiming supurdagi
of the same.
Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the
prayer made by learned counsel for the accused-petitioner.
(2 of 2) [CRLR-1990/2022]
Considering the overall submissions of the parties and
looking to the totality of facts and circumstances of the case while
refraining from passing any comments on the niceties of the
matter, this Court deems it appropriate to allow the revision
petition.
In view of the judgment passed by Hon'ble the Supreme
Court in the case of Sunderbhai Ambalal Desai Vs. State
ofGujarat [(2002) 10 SCC 283] & the order dated 18.11.2022
passed by Hon'ble the Supreme Court in Criminal Appeal
No.2005/2022 [SLP (Crl.) No.7280/2022] titled as Sainaba v.
The State of Kerela & Anr., wherein the vehicle involved in a
crime under NDPS Act, was directed to be released on terms and
conditions to be determined by the Special Court, the revision
petition is allowed. The order dated 28.09.2022 passed by learned
Additional District and Sessions Judge No.1, Kekri is hereby
quashed and set aside and this Court deems it just and
appropriate to release the vehicle in favour of the petitioner
provided he furnishes a Supurdaginama of Rs. 3,00,000/- and a
surety of like amount to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate
concerned.
The stay application stands disposed of.
(FARJAND ALI),J
PREETI VALECHA /53
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!