Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 581 Raj/2
Judgement Date : 17 January, 2023
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 16586/2022
Nanuram Vaishnav S/o Shri C.l Vaishnav, Aged About 37 Years,
Employee Id Rjbw200508010998 R/o Gram Ganglas Tehsil
Aasind, Bhilwara, Rajasthan (Presently Posted As Senior Teacher
At Government Senior Secondary School, Ganglas, Block Aasind,
Bhilwara, Rajasthan)
----Petitioner
Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Additional Chief
Secretary, School Education, Secretariat, Jaipur.
2. Joint Secretary, School Education Group 2, Secretariat,
Jaipur.
3. Principal Secretary, Department Of Personnel, Main
Building, Secretariat, Jaipur.
4. Director, Secondary Education, Bikaner, Rajasthan
5. Joint Director, School Education, Ajmer Division, Ajmer,
Rajasthan.
----Respondents
Connected With S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 15013/2022 Kailash Chand Son Of Shri Manna Lal, Aged About 56 Years, Employees Id Rjko 1992270001168 R/o Village Saatal Khedi, Tehsil Ramganj Mandi Kota Raj. (Presently Posted As Senior Teacher At Government Senior Secondary School, Kumbhkot Khairabaad, District Kota Raj.)
----Petitioner Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Principal Secretary, School Education, Secretariat, Jaipur.
2. Joint Director, School Education, Kota Division Kota (Raj.)
3. District Education Officer, Secondary, Kota.
----Respondents S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 15014/2022 Suresh Chand Jain Son Of Shri Manak Chand Jain, Aged About 54 Years, Employee Id Rjko199727000719 R/o Village Chechat,
(2 of 7) [CW-16586/2022]
Ramganjmandi, Kota, Raj. (Presently Posted As Lecturer Political Science At Government Senior Secondary School, Chechat, Ramganjmandi, District Kota, Raj.)
----Petitioner Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Principal Secretary, School Education, Bikaner.
2. Director, Secondary Education, Bikaner, (Raj.)
3. District Education Officer, Secondary, Kota.
----Respondents S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 16451/2022 Vikram Singh Jain S/o Late Shri Prem Singh Jain, Aged About 55 Years, Employee Id Rjbw199208006524 R/o A106 Shastri Nagar, Bhilwara, Rajasthan (Presently Posted As Lecturer, School Education At Government Senior Secondary School, Bhimganj, Bhilwara, Rajasthan).
----Petitioner Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Additional Chief Secretary, School Education, Secretariat, Jaipur.
2. Joint Secretary, School Education Group 2, Secretariat, Jaipur
3. Principal Secretary, Department Of Personnel, Main Building, Secretariat, Jaipur.
4. Director, Secondary Education, Bikaner, Rajasthan.
----Respondents S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 16633/2022 Ram Narayan Janwa S/o Shri Prem Chand, Aged About 50 Years, Employee Id - Rjpg200530011454 R/o Village Mahudiya Block Choti Sadri, Pratapgarh, Rajasthan (Presently Posted As Lecturer At Government Senior Secondary School, Jaloda Jageer, Rajasthan)
----Petitioner Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Additional Chief Secretary, School Education, Secretariat, Jaipur.
2. Joint Director, Secondary Education, Ajmer Division, Ajmer, Rajasthan.
(3 of 7) [CW-16586/2022]
3. District Education Officer, Secondary Education, Bhilwara.
4. Principal Secretary, Department Of Personnel, Main Building, Secretariat, Jaipur.
----Respondents S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 16640/2022 Mukesh Kumar Mali S/o Shri Jagdish Chandra Mali, Aged About 40 Years, Employee Id - Rjbw201408023314 R/o District Bhilwara, Rajasthan (Presently Posted As Senior Teacher At Government Senior Secondary School, Rajendra Marg, Bhilwara Rajasthan)
----Petitioner Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Additional Chief Secretary, School Education, Secretariat, Jaipur.
2. Joint Director, School Education, Ajmer Division, Ajmer.
3. District Education Officer, Secondary, Bhilwara.
4. Principal Secretary, Department Of Personnel, Secretariat, Jaipur.
----Respondents S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 16648/2022 Gautam Lal Janwa S/o Shri Beer Chand Janwa, Aged About 50 Years, Employee Id Rj200590011449 R/o Village Chogla Kheda, Swaroopganj, Choti Sadri, Pratapgarh (Presently Posted As Senior Teacher At Government Senior Secondary School, Siyakhedi, Rajasthan)
----Petitioner Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Additional Chief Secretary, School Education, Secretariat, Jaipur.
2. Joint Director, School Education, Ajmer Division, Ajmer.
3. District Education Officer, Secondary, Bhilwara
4. Principal Secretary, Department Of Personnel, Secretariat, Jaipur.
----Respondents S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 16649/2022 Anoop Singh Rajput S/o Shri Cheetar Singh Rajput, Aged About 40 Years, Employee Id Rjbw200508011846 R/o 2 A 13 Bapu
(4 of 7) [CW-16586/2022]
Nagar, Bhilwara, Rajasthan (Presently Posted As Senior Teacher At Government Girls Senior Secondary School, Gulmandi, Rajasthan)
----Petitioner Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Additional Chief Secretary, School Education, Secretariat, Jaipur.
2. Joint Director, School Education, Ajmer Division, Ajmer.
3. District Education Officer, Secondary, Bhilwara
4. Principal Secretary, Department Of Personnel, Secretariat, Jaipur.
----Respondents S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 16660/2022 Rajkumar Swarnkar S/o Shri Bhanwar Lal Soni, Aged About 58 Years, Employee Id - Rjbw199708016529 R/o B-307, Sanjay Colony, Devriya Balaji Road, Bhilwara, Rajasthan (Presently Posted As Senior Teacher At Government Senior Secondary School, Gandhinagar, Bhilwara, Rajasthan)
----Petitioner Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Additional Chief Secretary, School Education, Secretariat, Jaipur.
2. Joint Director, School Education, Ajmer Division, Ajmer.
3. District Education Officer, Secondary, Bhilwara.
4. Principal Secretary, Department Of Personnel, Secretariat, Jaipur.
----Respondents S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 16700/2022 Meghram Meena S/o Shri Kanahaiya Lal Meena, Aged About 56 Years, Employee Id- Rjpg199730006847 R/o Village Datasuti Block Bamanvas, Sawai Madhopur (Presently Posted As Senior Teacher At Government Senior Secondary School, Haripura, Rajasthan).
----Petitioner Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Additional Chief Secretary, School Education, Secretariat, Jaipur.
(5 of 7) [CW-16586/2022]
2. Joint Director, School Education, Udaipur Division,
Udaipur.
3. Principal Secretary, Department Of Personnel, Secretariat, Jaipur.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sudhir Gupta
For Respondent(s) : Mr. S.S. Raghav, AAG
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL
Order
17/01/2023
1. In all these writ petitions, the transfer order of petitioners
holding the post of Senior Teacher/Lecturer has been challenged
fundamentally on the ground that the Joint Director School
Education was not having competence to pass transfer orders.
2. Learned counsel for petitioners submits that vide notification
dated 26.07.2021, Rajasthan Education (State and Sub-Ordinate)
Service Rules, 2021 (hereinafter referred to "Rules of 2021") was
promulgated and Rajasthan Education Service Rules, 1970 and
Rajasthan Education Subordinate Service Rules, 1971 (hereinafter
referred to "Rules of 1970 & 1971"), have been deleted. The
powers of transfer were delegated to the Joint Registrar to the
Government under the rules of Rules of 1970 & 1971 and after
deletion of said rules, the impugned transfer order passed after
deletion of Rules of 1970 & 1971 is without jurisdiction. It has
been stated that under the Rules of 2021, the powers to the Joint
Directors, School Education and District Education Officer (H.Q)
Secondary Elementary have been delegated by the State
Government vide order dated 22.09.2022. In the order dated
22.09.2022, the delegation of powers has been made effective
retrospectively from the date when the Rules of 2021 were
(6 of 7) [CW-16586/2022]
promulgated vide notification dated 26.07.2021. Reliance has
been placed in case of Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd. & ors. Vs.
M/s Tata Communications Ltd. [2022 Live Law (SC) 792] to
contend that order dated 22.09.2022 cannot be held effective
retrospectively.
3. Per contra, the counsel appearing on behalf of respondents
submits that as per Section 2 (a) of the Rules of 1970 & 1971, the
State Government has delegated the powers to the Director and
Joint Director vide notification dated 16.02.1985 (Annexure R/2)
and after promulgation of new Rules of 2021, the earlier
notification of delegation of powers do not come to an end, and
further such notification is saved, as per the Rule 46 dealing with
repeal and saving. Therefore, it may not be said that the joint
Director was casted out of powers for passing impugned transfer
orders.
5. Heard. Considered.
6. At the outset, it is not in dispute that vide notification dated
26.07.2021, the Rules of 1970 & 1971, have been deleted and
Rules of 2021 have been promulgated. It is also not in dispute
that the State Government vide notification dated 16.02.1985,
issued under the Rules of 1970 & 1971, has delegated powers,
including power of transfer to the Appointing Authority. Rules 2 (a)
defines the appointing authority and the same is similar in the
Rules of 1970 & 1971 as well as in the Rules of 2021. Notification
dated 16.02.1985 (Annexure R/2) was issued by the State
Government delegating the powers to Appointing Authority as
mentioned in the schedule. As per Rule 46 of Rules of 2021, which
deals with repeal and saving delegation of powers vide notification
dated 16.02.1985 under Rules of 1970 & 1971 are saved.
(7 of 7) [CW-16586/2022]
7. Thus, it may not be held that the impugned transfer order
passed by the Joint Director, School Education on behalf of the
State Government during the period after issuance of notification
dated 28.07.2021 and before passing order dated 22.09.2022,
have been passed without having competence or delegation of
powers. The order dated 22.09.2022 does not entrust any new
powers.
8. As far as the Judgment of Hon'ble Supreme Court in case of
Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd.(supra) is concerned, the same is not
applicable in the facts of present case. In the present case, the
issue is related to the transfer order and powers delegated to the
Joint Director under Rules of 1970 & 1971 remains continue after
promulgation of Rules of 2021 and order dated 22.09.2022 issued
by the Government is just clarified to such aspect. Moreover, it is
not in dispute that all petitioners have joined at the transferred
place and the transfer orders have been acted upon as much as
have been affirmed by the Tribunal. Therefore, for the aforesaid
discussion, this Court is not inclined to interfere with the
impugned transfer orders while exercising its extra ordinary
jurisdiction under Article 226 of Constitution of India.
9. Accordingly, writ petitions are without force and the same
are hereby dismissed.
10. Stay applications and any other pending application, if any,
stand disposed of.
11. A copy of the this order be placed in each file.
(SUDESH BANSAL),J
TN/59-68
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!