Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 2383 Raj/2
Judgement Date : 27 February, 2023
[2023/RJJP/003419]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
D.B. Criminal Writ Petition (Parole) No. 280/2023
Kailash Chand S/o Shri Nand Kishor, Aged About 44 Years, R/o In
Front Of Narayan Talkies Jhalrapatan, Police Station Jhalrapatan,
District Jhalawar (Raj.) (At Present In Open Air Camp Sanganer
Jaipur)
----Petitioner
Versus
1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary Home,
Secretariat, Jaipur.
2. The District Parole Advisory Committee, Through Its
Chairman, District Magistrate, Jaipur.
3. Superintendent Central Jail, Jaipur.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Kailash Chand, present in person. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rajendra Yadav, G.A. cum AAG.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ BHANDARI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BHUWAN GOYAL
Judgment
27/02/2023
1. Petitioner is present in person.
2. Petitioner has preferred this writ petition (parole) aggrieved
by impugned order dated 21.10.2022, whereby his fourth regular
parole application for 40 days was rejected by the Authorities on
the ground that petitioner is not entitled to parole under Rule
16(2)(b) of Rajasthan Prisoners Release on Parole Rules, 2021.
3. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the fourth regular
parole.
4. We have considered the contentions.
[2023/RJJP/003419] (2 of 2) [CRLW-280/2023]
5. In view of the judgment of Apex Court in Hitesh @ Bavko
Shivshankar Dave vs State of Gujarat, Criminal Writ
Petition No.467/2022, decided by the Apex Court vide order
dated 24.01.2023, wherein it was held that the Rules as prevalent
at the time of conviction has to be applied. The present petitioner
has already availed three paroles. Rejection of fourth regular
parole on account of bar under Rule 16(2)(b) of Rajasthan
Prisoners Release on Parole Rules, 2021 cannot be sustained.
6. The judgment in this case was delivered on 01.08.2016,
hence, the petitioner would be governed by the Rajasthan
Prisoners Release on Parole Rules, 1958. The State Authorities are
directed to reconsider the case of the petitioner in accordance with
Rajasthan Prisoners Release on Parole Rules, 1958.
7. Criminal Writ Petition(Parole) is accordingly, disposed of. The
impugned order dated 21.10.2022 therefore, deserves to be
quashed and set aside qua the petitioner. We direct the Parole
Advisory Committee to reconsider the case of the petitioner in
accordance with Rajasthan Prisoners Release on Parole Rules,
1958 within a period of four weeks from the date of filing of the
application.
(BHUWAN GOYAL),J (PANKAJ BHANDARI),J
Ramesh Vaishnav /86
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!