Saturday, 16, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Mohar Singh And Anr vs State Animal Husbandry Dep Ors ...
2023 Latest Caselaw 2323 Raj/2

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 2323 Raj/2
Judgement Date : 24 February, 2023

Rajasthan High Court
Mohar Singh And Anr vs State Animal Husbandry Dep Ors ... on 24 February, 2023
Bench: Anoop Kumar Dhand
[2023/RJJP/003357]

         HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
                     BENCH AT JAIPUR

                S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 19658/2012

Surendra Singh Bola S/o Shri Hari Ram, aged about 24 years,
Farda     Ki   Dhani,      Post     Mandrela,         Tehsil        Chirawa,   District
Jhunjhunu.
                                                                        ----Petitioner
                                       Versus
1.       The State Of Rajasthan Through The Secretary, Animal
         Husbandry Department, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Secretariat,
         Jaipur.
2.       The Director, Animal Husbandry Department, Government
         Of Rajasthan, Jaipur. (Raj.)
                                                                     ----Respondents

Connected With S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 15384/2012

1. Mohar Singh Son of Shri Vidhya Dhar Singh, age about 30 years, Resident of village & Post Bibasar, via-Nua, District Jhunjhunu (Raj.)

2. Rajeev Mahla son of Shri Madan Lal Mahla, aged about 25 years, Resident of village & Post Khanga Ka Bass, Post Derwala, District Jhunjhunu (Raj.)

----Petitioners Versus

1. The State of Rajasthan through the Secretary, Animal Husbandry Department, Government of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur

2. The Director, Animal Husbandry Department, Government of Rajasthan, Jaipur (Raj.)

----Respondents

For Petitioner(s) : None present For Respondent(s) : None present

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND

Order

24/02/2023

[2023/RJJP/003357] (2 of 4) [CW-19658/2012]

Since common question of law and facts is involved in

these petitions, hence both petitions are decided together by this

common judgment.

Instant petitions have been filed by the petitioners with

the following prayer:-

In S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 19658/2012:-

"It is therefore, most humbly prayed that your Loardship may graciously be pleased to accept and allow this writ petition and call for and examine entire record of the case and

i) By an appropriate writ, order and direction in the nature thereof the respondents may kindly be directed to consider the candidature of the petitioner for selection/appointment on the post of Live Stock Assistant and he be given appointment on the said post.

ii) Any other order which this Hon'ble Court deemed just and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case may also be passed in favour of the petitioner."

In S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 15384/2012:-

"It is therefore, most humbly prayed that your Loardships' may graciously be pleased to admit and allow this writ petition; call for and examine entire record of the case and

a) By an appropriate writ, order and direction in the nature thereof and thereby direct the respondents to consider the candidature of the petitioner for selection/appointment on the post of Live Stock Assistant and they be given appointment on the said post;

b) Any other relief, order or direction which this Hon'ble Court deemed fit and proper in the facts

[2023/RJJP/003357] (3 of 4) [CW-19658/2012]

and circumstances of the case may also be passed in favour of the petitioners;

c) thereby the cost of the writ petition be also awarded in favour of the petitioners."

Perusal of the contents of the writ petition reveals that

the petitioners are seeking appointment on the post of Live Stock

Assistant in pursuance of the advertisement / notification dated

27.01.2011.

As per the reply submitted by the respondents, the

respondents constituted a Committee for scrutiny of applications

and after inquiry and examining the applications for the post of

Live Stock Assistant, the Committee submitted its report to the

Department for selection and appointment and thereafter

appointment were given to the selected candidates. As per the

reply, the petitioners were not in merit hence they were not

offered appointment. As per the reply, appointment has been

given to all selected candidates strictly in pursuance of the

notification dated 27.01.2011 and as per the Rajasthan Animal

Husbandry Subordinate Service Rules, 1987.

As per the contents of the reply, the selection process is

over now thereafter no relief can be granted to the petitioners at

this stage.

Considering the contents of the reply submitted on

behalf of the respondents and looking to the fact that the selection

process in pursuance of the advertisement dated 27.01.2011 has

already been completed, no relief can be granted by this Court in

these petitions.

[2023/RJJP/003357] (4 of 4) [CW-19658/2012]

Both petitions, being devoid of merits, stand dismissed.

Stay applications along with all applications (pending, if any) also

stand dismissed accordingly.

(ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J

MR/10-11

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter