Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 1591 Raj
Judgement Date : 9 February, 2023
[2023/RJJD/004620] (1 of 3) [CW-9944/2018]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 9944/2018
Swati D/o Jagram, W/o Narsh, Aged About 25 Years, Village Ganga Singh Pura, Post Dobhi, Tehsil Bhadra, District Hanumangarh (Raj.).
----Petitioner Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Secretary, Department Of Education, Government Secretariat, Jaipur, Rajasthan.
2. The Director, Elementary Education, Rajasthan, Bikaner.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Hanuman Singh For Respondent(s) : Mr. Pankaj Sharma, AAG with Mr. Deepak Chandak
HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI
Order
09/02/2023
Learned Additional Advocate General appearing on behalf of
the respondents fairly submits that the controversy involved in the
present writ petitions is no more res-integra and it is covered by
the decision rendered by the Division Bench of this Hon'ble Court
in Anita Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors.; D.B. Civil Special
Appeal (Writ) No.86/2021 on 21.10.2021. The relevant portion
of the order reads as follows:
"We have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the documents.
The issue of carrying caste certificate by a person belonging to reserved category upon migration from one State to another State is settled by a judgment of Supreme Court in case of Marri Chandra Shekhar Rao Vs. Seth G.S. Medical
[2023/RJJD/004620] (2 of 3) [CW-9944/2018]
College [(1990) 3 SCC 130] and it is concluded by a Constitutional Bench judgment in case of Ranjana Kumari Vs. State of Uttarakhand & Ors. [(2019) 15 SCC 664]. The following observations were made in para 4 of the judgment:
"Two Constitutional Bench judgments of this Court in Marri Chandra Shekhar Rao vs. Seth G.S. Medical College and Action Committee on Issue of Caste Certificate to Scs/STs v. Union of India have taken the view that merely because in the migrant State the same caste is recognised as Scheduled Caste, the migrant cannot be recognised as Scheduled Caste of the migrant State. The issuance of a caste certificate by the State of Uttarakhand, as in the present case, cannot dilute the rigours of the Constitution Bench judgments in Marri Chandra Shekhar Rao and Action Committee."
In view of the concluded legal position, the respondents were justified perfectly justified in terminating services of the appellant- petitioner after giving opportunity of hearing.
Learned counsel for the appellant- etitioner, however, raised a strange argument that the judgment must be applied prospectively. It is well-settled that decision of Supreme Court clarifies the correct position of law and in terms of Article 141 of the Constitution of India becomes a law of land and would be applicable to all pending cases.
In the result, the appeal is dismissed."
From the record, it is admitted that the migrated person
cannot be given reservation, which is on the basis of his caste
certificate in the other State.
[2023/RJJD/004620] (3 of 3) [CW-9944/2018]
In light of the aforequoted order, this writ petition is
dismissed in the same terms. All pending applications also stand
disposed of.
(DR.PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI),J 181-Zeeshan
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!