Tuesday, 12, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Jakir Mohammd Qurashy S/O Ibrahim ... vs Shiriman Mukhya Sashan Sachiv ...
2023 Latest Caselaw 1475 Raj/2

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 1475 Raj/2
Judgement Date : 3 February, 2023

Rajasthan High Court
Jakir Mohammd Qurashy S/O Ibrahim ... vs Shiriman Mukhya Sashan Sachiv ... on 3 February, 2023
Bench: Pankaj Mithal, Anoop Kumar Dhand
[2023/RJJP/001407]

        HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
                    BENCH AT JAIPUR

          D.B. Writ Miscellaneous Application No. 317/2022

Jakir Mohammd Qurashy S/o Ibrahim Mohammd Qurashy, Aged
About     49    Years,     Teacher,        Resident        Of      Neembari    Gate,
Jhalrapatan,         District      Jhalawar           (Raj.)        Employee      Id
Rjjw199722018144.
                                                                       ----Petitioner
                                      Versus
1.       Shiriman Mukhya Sashan Sachiv, (School Education)
         Rajasthan, Jaipur.
2.       Shriman      Nideshak        Mahodaya          (Prarambhik       Shiksha),
         Rajasthan, Bikaner.
3.       Shriman      Sanyukt        Nideshak,         School       Shiksha,    Kota
         Division, Kota.
4.       Shriman Zila Shiksha Adhikari, Mukhyalaya Prarambhik,
         Jhalawar.
                                                                    ----Respondents
For Petitioner(s)            :    None present
For Respondent(s)            :



HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. PANKAJ MITHAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND

Order

03/02/2023

1. No one appears on behalf of the applicant-appellant.

2. The appeal was decided vide judgment and order dated

01.11.2022.

3. In the decided matter, an application has been moved

praying that some conspiracy is being hatched against the

petitioner-appellant, with the result the order is not being

implemented.

[2023/RJJP/001407] (2 of 2) [WMAP-317/2022]

4. Once a case has been decided, the Court becomes functus

officio and no further application in the decided case is

maintainable, unless it happens to be an application for

recall/review. The present application is neither for review nor for

recall of any order, therefore, ex-facie it is not maintainable.

6. Accordingly, the application is rejected with liberty to the

applicant-appellant to take recourse to other remedies, that may

be available to him in law.

(ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J (PANKAJ MITHAL),CJ

KAMLESH KUMAR/RAJAT/1

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter