Tuesday, 12, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Suresh Nayak Son Of Shri Ramkishan ... vs State Of Rajasthan ...
2023 Latest Caselaw 1460 Raj/2

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 1460 Raj/2
Judgement Date : 3 February, 2023

Rajasthan High Court
Suresh Nayak Son Of Shri Ramkishan ... vs State Of Rajasthan ... on 3 February, 2023
Bench: Ganesh Ram Meena
[2023/RJJP/001440]

        HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
                    BENCH AT JAIPUR

 S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 131/2023

Suresh Nayak Son Of Shri Ramkishan @ Bodan Nayak ( Bhopa),
Aged About 30 Years, Resident Of Bhopakapura, Pahadi, Police
Station Balghat, District Karauli (Raj.) ( At Present Accused
Petitioner Confined In Sub Jail Hindaun District Karauli)
                                                                   ----Petitioner
                                    Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p.
                                                                 ----Respondent
For Petitioner(s)          :    Mr. Ram Ratan Gurjar
For Respondent(s)          :    Mr. Deepak Sharma
For State                  :    Mr. Mahendra Meena, PP



          HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA

                          Judgment / Order

03/02/2023

1. This bail application has been filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

2. F.I.R. No.0239/2022 was registered at Police Station Balghat,

District Karauli for the offence/s mentioned therein.

3. It is contended by counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner

has falsely been implicated in this case as he has nothing to do

with the alleged incident. The incident is stated to be taken place

on 03.07.2022, whereas, F.I.R. was lodged on 24.07.2022, after a

delay of about 21 days. The petitioner is behind the bars since

24.11.2022 and no purpose will be served in keeping him behind

the bars. Further detention of the petitioner is not warranted for

interrogation and recovery purposes. Trial of the case is likely to

take considerable time.

[2023/RJJP/001440] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-131/2023]

4. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application.

5. I have considered the contentions.

6. Considering the contentions put forth by counsel for the

petitioner(s) but without making any opinion on the merits and

demerits of the case, I deem it proper to allow the bail application.

7. This bail application is, accordingly, allowed and it is directed

that accused-petitioner shall be released on bail provided

he/she/each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of

Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac only) together with two sureties in

the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) each to the

satisfaction of the trial Court with the stipulation that he/she/each

of them shall appear before that Court and any Court to which the

matter be transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as

and when called upon to do so.

(GANESH RAM MEENA),J

ARTI SHARMA /99

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter