Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 11071 Raj
Judgement Date : 21 December, 2023
[2023:RJ-JD:44857]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 19544/2023
1. Hari Singh S/o Shri Yad Ram, Aged About 48 Years, By
Caste Yadav (Obc), R/o Manethi, Tehsil Mundawar, District
Alwar. Presently Working As Chowkidar In Govt.
Ambedkar Boys Hostel Badi Sadri, District Chittorgarh
(Rajasthan).
2. Krishna Mali S/o Shri Kanheyalal Mali, Aged About 23
Years, By Caste Mali (Obc), R/o Nimbahera, District
Chittorgarh, Presently Working As Chowkidar In Govt.
Ambedkar Boys Hostel Nimbahera, District Chittorgarh
(Rajasthan).
3. Shaitan Singh Gurjar S/o Shri Tulsi Ram Gurjar, Aged
About 29 Years, By Caste Gurjar (Mbc), R/o Gurjar
Mohalla, Bansra, District Sawai Madhopur, Presently
Working As Chowkidaar In Govt. Devnarayan Boys Hostel
Choth Ka Barwada, District Sawaimadhopur (Rajasthan).
----Petitioners
Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary, Social
Welfare Department, Rajasthan, Jaipur.
2. The Director, Social Welfare Department, Jaipur.
3. The Assistant Director, Social Welfare Department,
Chittorgarh.
4. The Assistant Director, Social Welfare Department,
Sawaimadhopur.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mahipal Rajpurohit
For Respondent(s) : ---
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP MATHUR
Order
21/12/2023
Learned counsel for the petitioners submit that the
controversy involved in the present writ petition is squarely
[2023:RJ-JD:44857] (2 of 2) [CW-19544/2023]
covered by the judgment of this Court in bunch of writ petition led
by S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.372/2013; Anokh Bai Vs. State
of Raj. & Ors.
In view of the aforesaid, the present writ petition is disposed
of with a direction to the petitioners to file a representation within
two weeks along with certified copy of the order instant and a
copy of the judgment in the case of Anokh Bai (supra).
On receipt of representation along with the certified copy of
the order instant, respondents shall decide the same within period
of eight weeks, in accordance with law including the law laid down
in Anokh Bai's case.
It is made clear that aforesaid direction to decide the
representation has been issued only with a view to ensure
expeditious redressal of petitioner's grievance. The same may not
be construed to be an order to decide the representation in a
particular manner.
The stay application also stands disposed of accordingly.
The order has been passed based on the submissions made
in the petition, the respondents would be free to examine the
veracity of the submissions made in the petition and only in case,
the averments made therein are found to be correct, the
petitioners would be entitled to the relief.
(KULDEEP MATHUR),J 52-Hanuman/-
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!