Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 10803 Raj
Judgement Date : 15 December, 2023
[2023:RJ-JD:43895]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 19068/2023
1. Madan Lal S/o Shri Kistur, Aged About 51 Years, B/c
Meghwal (Sc), R/o Boosi, Tehsil Rani, District Pali.
Presently Working As Chowkidaar In Govt. Ambedkar
Boys Hostel Khod, District Pali.
2. Jagdish Prasad Bairwa S/o Shri Bajrang Lal, Aged About
52 Years, B/c Bairwa (S.c.), R/o Bassi Mohalla, Khandar,
District Sawai Madhopur. Presently Working As Cook Cum
Chowkidaar In Govt. Ambedkar Boys Hostel (S.c.) District
Sawai Madhopur.
3. Kishor S/o Shri Shishpal, Aged About 37 Years, B/c
Meghwal (S.c.), R/o Village Todpura, Tehsil Nawalgarh,
District Jhunjhunu. Presently Working As Cook In Govt.
Ambedkar Boys Hostel Nawalgarh, District Jhunjhunu.
----Petitioners
Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary Social Welfare
Department, Rajasthan, Jaipur.
2. The Director, Social Welfare Department, Jaipur.
3. The Assistant Director, Social Welfare Department, Pali.
4. The Assistant Director, Social Welfare Department, Sawai
Madhopur.
5. The Assistant Director, Social Welfare Department,
Jhunjhunu.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Pulkeshwar Rajpurohit
HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI
Order
15/12/2023
1. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the
controversy involved in the present writ petition is squarely
covered by the judgment of this Court in bunch of writ petition led
[2023:RJ-JD:43895] (2 of 2) [CW-19068/2023]
by S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.372/2013; Anokh Bai Vs. State
of Raj. & Ors.
2. In view of the aforesaid, the present writ petition is disposed
of with a direction to the petitioners to file a representation within
two weeks along with certified copy of the order instant and a
copy of the judgment in the case of Anokh Bai (supra).
3. On receipt of representation along with the certified copy of
the order instant, respondents shall decide the same within period
of eight weeks from the date of receipt of certified copy of this
order, in accordance with law including the law laid down in Anokh
Bai's case.
4. It is made clear that aforesaid direction to decide the
representation has been issued only with a view to ensure
expeditious redressal of petitioners' grievance. The same may not
be construed to be an order to decide the representation in a
particular manner.
5. The stay application also stands disposed of accordingly.
6. The order has been passed based on the submissions made
in the petition, the respondents would be free to examine the
veracity of the submissions made in the petition and only in case,
the averments made therein are found to be correct, the
petitioners would be entitled to the relief.
(DR.PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI),J 18-Zeeshan
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!