Saturday, 16, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Smt. Mirki And Ors vs Dasrath Singh And Ors ...
2023 Latest Caselaw 10708 Raj

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 10708 Raj
Judgement Date : 14 December, 2023

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur

Smt. Mirki And Ors vs Dasrath Singh And Ors ... on 14 December, 2023

[2023:RJ-JD:43831]

      HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
                       JODHPUR
                 S.B. Civil Misc. Appeal No. 1070/2004

1. Smt. Mirki w/o Late Bhagwati Meena, Aged 24 years,
2. Sh. Babulal s/o Bhagwatilal Meena, Aged 05 years,
3. Sh. Shankerlal S/o Bhagwatilal Meena, Aged 03 years,
4. Sh. Prakesh S/o Bhagwatilal Meena, Aged 02 years,
5. Sh. Shanti S/o Bhagwatilal Meena, Aged 03 months,
      Appellants no. 02-05 are minors through Guardian appellant
      no.01,
6. Smt. Ganga w/o Dhulaji Meena, Aged 55 years, All resident
      of Pipli "B", Tehsil Kherwada, District Udaipur.
                                                                   ----Appellants
                                    Versus
1. Sh. Dasrath Singh s/o Raghunath Singh Rajpoot, Resident of
      Gram Banewdi, P.S. Shree Nagar, District Ajmer.
2. Managing Director, Rajasthan Co-operative Dairy Federation
      Limited, Jaipur. Branch Goverdhan Vilas, Udaipur.
3.   The New India Insurance Company Limited, 3,                     Bapu Bazar,
      Udaipur.
                                                                 ----Respondents


For Appellant(s)          :     Mr. Sandeep Sarupuria

For Respondent No.3       :     Mr. Sunil A. Vyas
Insurance Co.



            HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MUNNURI LAXMAN

Order

14/12/2023

1. The present appeal is filed challenging the award dated

27.03.2004 passed by the learned Judge, Motor Accident Claims

Tribunal, Salumbhar on the file of MAC Case No.309/2002,

wherein and whereby the claim of the appellants-claimants for

compensation was partly allowed granting the compensation of

Rs.2,71,800/- with interest.

[2023:RJ-JD:43831] (2 of 4) [CMA-1070/2004]

2. The present appeal is filed by the claimants. The contention

of learned counsel for the claimants is that the deceased is

survived by wife, mother and four sisters and according to him,

the appropriate deduction should be 1/4 and not 1/3 since the

dependents of the deceased are more than 4.

3. Learned counsel appearing for the Insurance Company has

submitted that sisters cannot be said to be dependents since they

have not entered into a witness box. There is no evidence whether

they are married or unmarried and it is also his contention that by

this time, they must have been married and they cannot be

treated as a dependent in permanent nature and any dependency

must have been for temporary.

4. Heard both the sides.

5. The contention of learned counsel for the Insurance

Company found to be appealing and the sisters have not entered

into a witness box. Be that as it may, the Tribunal below has

granted some compensation to them which this Court is not

disturbing. They must have been married now and the

dependency, if any, must have been a temporary dependency,

therefore, the 1/3 deduction is maintained.

6. A perusal of the award impugned, the undisputed facts are

that the deceased was of 25 years. He was a mining labour and

earning monthly income of Rs.1,800/-. The appropriate

compensation towards future prospects when the deceased is

aged 25 years and temporarily self employed is 40% of the actual

salary.

[2023:RJ-JD:43831] (3 of 4) [CMA-1070/2004]

7. The Tribunal applied multiplier of 17. The appropriate

multiplier for the person in the age group of 21-25 is 18 instead of

17.

8. The claimants are also entitled for enhancement of

compensation towards conventional heads. The Tribunal granted

Rs.2000/- for funeral expenses, which shall be Rs.15,000/-. The

compensation of Rs.15,000/- is granted for loss of estate, and

wife and mother of the deceased is entitled for Rs.40,000/-each

towards consortium.

9. Taking into account the above factors, the following amounts

are arrived at:

1. Annual income of the deceased (1800 x 12) 21,600

2. Added: future prospects (40%) 8,640

3. Total annual income of the deceased (21,600 30,240 +8640)

4. Deducted : towards personal expenses (1/3) 10,080

5. Annual amount of dependency (30,240-10,080) 20,160

7. Total amount of dependency (20,160 X 18) 3,62,880

8. Added : Consortium to all claimants (40,000 X 80,000

2)

9. Added : Loss of estate 15,000 Added : Funeral expenses 15,000 Total entitlement of the appellants 4,72,880

10. In the result, the appeal is partly allowed enhancing the

compensation from Rs.2,71,800/- to Rs.4,72,880/-. The enhanced

compensation shall be paid with interest @7.5% per annum from

the date of filing the petition till the date of deposition. The

[2023:RJ-JD:43831] (4 of 4) [CMA-1070/2004]

amount shall be deposited within two months from the date of this

judgment.

(MUNNURI LAXMAN),J 6-AnilKC/NK

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter