Surendra Singh Sodha vs State Of Rajasthan (2023:Rj-Jd:43395)
2023 Latest Caselaw 10656 Raj

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur

Surendra Singh Sodha vs State Of Rajasthan (2023:Rj-Jd:43395) on 13 December, 2023

Author: Pushpendra Singh Bhati

Bench: Pushpendra Singh Bhati

[2023:RJ-JD:43395]

      HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
                       JODHPUR
                S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 19080/2023

Surendra Singh Sodha S/o Shri Padam Singh Sodha, Aged About
38 Years, Resident Of House No. J-27, Hudco Colony, Sector No.
06, Hanumangarh, (Rajasthan).
                                                                    ----Petitioner
                                    Versus
1.       State Of Rajasthan, Through The Commissioner, Abkari
         Bhawan, Udaipur (Rajasthan).
2.       The District Excise Officer, Hanumangarh (Rajasthan).
                                                                 ----Respondents


For Petitioner(s)         :     Mr. Shailesh Kumar.
For Respondent(s)         :



      HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI

Order

13/12/2023

1. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner aggrieved

against the order dated 23.12.2020 (Annex.2), whereby the

petitioner has been placed under suspension.

2. It is, inter alia, indicating that challan against the petitioner

is filed and despite passage of sufficient time, the petitioner has

not been reinstated and, therefore, the order of suspension

requires review and the petitioner deserves to be reinstated.

3. The petitioner with reference to judgment in Manvendra

Singh v. State of Raj. & Ors.: SBCW No. 4276/2018, decided on

21.12.2018 submitted that the Court in the said judgment has

dealt with the powers of the disciplinary authority under Rule 13

(5) of the Rules of 1958 and appellate authority under Rule 22 of

the Rules of 1958 and has held that the various circulars issued by

[2023:RJ-JD:43395] (2 of 2) [CW-19080/2023]

the State Government laying down limitation to examine the

revocation of suspension order after a period of three years from

the date of suspension/after a period of one year from the date,

the charge-sheet has been filed, was not justified and it was open

for the authorities to examine the case for revocation of

suspension even prior to the said periods fixed in the circular.

4. In the over all facts & circumstances of the case as projected

as well as the law laid down by this Court in the case of

Manvendra Singh (supra), the writ petition filed by the petitioner

is disposed of, the disciplinary authority is directed to decide the

representation to be made by the petitioner in light of the

judgment in the case of Manvendra Singh (supra) as well as

circular dated 22.03.2023 (Annex.3) issued by the DOPT, Govt. of

Rajasthan, Jaipur.

5. The needful may be done by the respondents within a period

of three months from the date a copy of this order is placed by the

petitioner.

6. The order has been passed based on the submissions made

in the petition, the respondents would be free to examine the

veracity of the submissions made in the petition and only in case,

the averments made therein are found to be correct, the petitioner

would be entitled to the relief.

(DR.PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI), J.

269-/Jitender//-

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)