Monday, 18, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Ramswaroop Bishnoi vs Union Of India (2023:Rj-Jd:42172)
2023 Latest Caselaw 10425 Raj

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 10425 Raj
Judgement Date : 5 December, 2023

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur

Ramswaroop Bishnoi vs Union Of India (2023:Rj-Jd:42172) on 5 December, 2023

Author: Praveer Bhatnagar

Bench: Praveer Bhatnagar

[2023:RJ-JD:42172]

      HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
                       JODHPUR
    S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 7525/2023

Ramswaroop Bishnoi S/o Aasu Ram Bishnoi, Aged About 28
Years, R/o Thambudiyo Ki Dhani, Nimbali Patelan, Post And
Tehsil Rohat Police Station Rohat Distt. Pali( At Present Lodged
In Distt. Jail ,pali)
                                                                      ----Petitioner
                                       Versus
Union Of India, Through Ncb
                                                                    ----Respondent


For Petitioner(s)            :     Mr. Vinod Kumar Sharma
                                   Mr. Dilip Kumar Sharma
For Respondent(s)            :     Mr. M.R. Pareek, Special PP



         HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR

Order

05/12/2023

The instant bail application has been filed under Section 439

Cr.P.C. on behalf of accused-petitioner. The petitioner has been

arrested in connection with FIR No.VIII(VI)06/NCB/ASZ/2021

registered at Police Station NCB, Ajmer, District Ajmer for the

offence(s) under Sections 8/15, 18, 25, 28 read with Section 29 of

N.D.P.S. Act.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner

has been implicated solely on the statement given by the co-

accused under Section 67 of N.D.P.S. Act, from whom, the

contraband articles containing commercial quantity of Poppy Straw

weighing 123 Kgs. 760 Gms, 9 Kgs. and 830 Gms Opium was

recovered. He further submits that accused-petitioner was

arrested after one year four months of the incident and the call

[2023:RJ-JD:42172] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-7525/2023]

details, collected by the Investigating Officer, disclose that the

mobile bearing No.8306249099 belongs to Khetaram S/o Birbal

Bishnoi. The mobile was not recovered from the possession of the

accused-petitioner, the so-called statement given by the co-

accused under Section 67 of N.D.P.S. Act is not admissible, more

so, the trial of the case may take considerable time, therefore, the

benefit of grant of bail may be granted to the accused-petitioner.

Per contra, learned special Public Prosecutor appearing on

behalf of NCB vehemently opposes the bail application and

submits that the main accused Pappuram and Anil Bishnoi in their

statement rendered under Section 67 of N.D.P.S. Act have named

that they were regularly supplying contraband articles to the

present petitioner and were going to deliver the same to the

present petitioner; the accused-petitioner was using the mobile

bearing No.8306249099 and was in regular contact with the other

main accused Pappuram and Anil Bishnoi. The call details so far

collected indicate that Pappuram and Anil Bishnoi were in regular

contact with the present petitioner. The present petitioner in his

statement rendered under Section 67 of N.D.P.S. Act has disclosed

that he was using the mobile bearing No.8306249099 and was in

continuous contact with the co-accused. He also submits that

accused-petitioner is involved in another case of similar nature,

therefore, the bail application of the accused-petitioner may be

dismissed.

In support of his submissions learned counsel for the NCB

relied upon judgment of Union of India (NCB) Etc. Vs. Khalil

Uddin Etc. passed in Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.)

No(s).5505-5506/2022 and Union of India Vs. Ajay Kumar

[2023:RJ-JD:42172] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-7525/2023]

Singh @ Pappu passed in Criminal Appeal No.__ of 2023

(Arising out of SLP (Crl.) No.2351 of 2023.

I have considered the arguments advanced by the counsel

for the parties. The accused-petitioner was arrested after one year

four months from the date of recovery and recovery of the

contraband article was effected from the main accused Pappuram

and Anil Bishnoi and apart from the disclosure statement of Anil

Bishnoi there is no other direct evidence indicating the

involvement of the present petitioner. The call details collected by

the department indicate that the mobile was in the name of some

Khetaram and the said mobile was not recovered, therefore in

light of the above facts and that the trial of the case may take

considerable time, I deem it just and proper to enlarge the

accused-petitioner on bail.

Accordingly, the bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is

allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner

Ramswaroop Bishnoi S/o Aasu Ram Bishnoi arrested in

connection with FIR No.VIII(VI)06/NCB/ASZ/2021 registered at

Police Station NCB, Ajmer, District Ajmer shall be enlarged on bail

provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/-

with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the

learned trial Judge for his appearance before the court concerned

on all the dates of hearing as and when called upon to do so.

(PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J 15-Suraj/-

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter