Monday, 08, Jun, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Purushotam Lal Sindhi vs The State Of Rajasthan ...
2023 Latest Caselaw 10399 Raj

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 10399 Raj
Judgement Date : 4 December, 2023

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur

Purushotam Lal Sindhi vs The State Of Rajasthan ... on 4 December, 2023

Author: Pushpendra Singh Bhati

Bench: Pushpendra Singh Bhati

[2023:RJ-JD:42008]

      HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
                       JODHPUR
                S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 18614/2023

1.       Purushotam Lal Sindhi S/o Shobha Ram Sindhi, Aged
         About 56 Years, R/o Bijli Vibhag Ke Pass City, Sawai
         Madhopur, Rajasthan.
2.       Indra Tanwani D/o Late Shree Chandu Mal Tanwani, Aged
         About 64 Years, R/o 4-Gha-13, Shastri Nagar, Housing
         Board, Jaipur, Rajasthan.
3.       Shri Chand Yadav S/o Magni Ram Yadav, Aged About 59
         Years, R/o Machhroli, Tehsil Kishangarh Bas, Alwar,
         Rajasthan.
4.       Rajesh Kumar S/o Shankar Lal, Aged About 55 Years, R/o
         4/18 New Civil Lines, Kota Road, Bara, Rajasthan.
5.       Madan Lal Gupta S/o Manna Lal Gupta, Aged About 56
         Years, R/o 4-Ka-189-190, Sivaji Park, Alwar, Rajasthan.
6.       Hemant Kumar Gupta S/o Bhagwat Prasad Gupta, Aged
         About 57 Years, R/o Swastik 13, Modi Ki Bawri, Old
         Station Road, Alwar, Rajasthan.
7.       Naveen Kumar Sharma S/o Late Chetan Lal, Aged About
         56 Years, R/o Sukriti, 77A Infront Of Somya Vihar, G Ext.
         Ambedkar Nagar, Alwar, Rajasthan.
                                                                     ----Petitioners
                                     Versus
1.       The State Of Rajasthan, Through Principle Secretary
         Department      Of    Personnel         And      Training    Government
         Secretariat, Jaipur.
2.       The Deputy Secretary, Department Of Administrative
         Reforms (Group-3), Secretariat, Jaipur.
3.       The Secretary (Finance), Finance Department, State Of
         Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur.
4.       The Registrar, Revenue Board, Ajmer, Rajasthan.
5.       The District Collector, District Nagaur, Rajasthan.
6.       The District Collector, District Hanumangadh, Rajasthan.
7.       The District Collector, District Bundi, Rajasthan
8.       The District Collector, District Sawai Madhopur, Rajasthan.
9.       The District Collector, District Bara, Rajasthan
10.      The District Collector, District Alwar, Rajasthan

                      (Downloaded on 04/12/2023 at 08:47:24 PM)
 [2023:RJ-JD:42008]                      (2 of 3)                          [CW-18614/2023]


                                                                     ----Respondents


For Petitioner(s)            :     Mr. Jai Naveen



      HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI

Order

04/12/2023

1. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that in similar

circumstances and similar matters, the Division Bench of this

Court in The Director, Secondary Education, Rajasthan,

Bikaner Vs. Narendra Kumar Boolchandani & Ors.; D.B.

Special Appeal Writ No.362/2020 along with connected

matters, while considering the aspect that the issue in question

has arisen in large number of cases and the Government has

accepted the stand and granted the benefits, disposed of the

appeals with the following directions:-

"Learned counsel for the petitioners, however, submitted that the issue is arising in large number of cases and in several departments, the Government has accepted the stand and granted the benefits. If the petitioners are not granted similar benefits, it would amount to discriminatory treatment. Whatever be the grievance of the petitioners they can be resolved at the level of the administration or by the Court through bipartite hearing.

In view of the peculiar circumstances, these appeals are disposed of by permitting the Government to take into account the representations already made or to be filed by any of the petitioners within one month. In the process, the authorities will bear in mind the stand taken by the department in similar cases. Such representations would be decided in accordance with law unmindful of the observations and directions issued by the learned Single Judge in the impugned orders. Eventually, if the grievances

[2023:RJ-JD:42008] (3 of 3) [CW-18614/2023]

of the petitioner still survive after the Government decision, it is open for the petitioners to seeks redressal thereafter in accordance with law."

2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the present

writ petition of the petitioners may also be disposed of in light of

the above-mentioned judgment.

3. In view of the submissions made, the present writ petition is

disposed of with the same directions as issued by the Division

Bench of this Court in the case of Narendra Kumar Boolchandani

(supra). All pending applications also stand disposed of.

(DR.PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI),J 40-Zeeshan

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter