Saturday, 16, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Kishan Gurjar vs State Of Rajasthan
2023 Latest Caselaw 6147 Raj

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 6147 Raj
Judgement Date : 21 August, 2023

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur
Kishan Gurjar vs State Of Rajasthan on 21 August, 2023
Bench: Farjand Ali

(1 of 3) [CRLAS-1611/2023]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S.B. Criminal Appeal No. 1611/2023

1. Kishan Gurjar S/o Satyanarayan, Aged About 23 Years, R/ o Udeshi Kunwa, Police Station Bagdinagar, District Pali (Raj.)

2. Sher Mohammad @ Sher Khan S/o Rasul Khan, Aged About 21 Years, R/o Udeshi Kunwa, Police Station Bagdinagar, District Pali (Raj.)

3. Bajrang Nath S/o Kalu Nath, Aged About 19 Years, R/o Udeshi Kunwa, Police Station Bagdinagar, District Pali (Raj.)

----Appellants Versus

1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

2. Mangla Ram S/o Gyana Ram, R/o Isharnada, Police Station Khimsar, District Nagaur (Raj.)

----Respondents

For Appellant(s) : Mr. Kishan Gurjar (present-in-

person)) For Respondent(s) : Mr. Abhishek Purohit, AGA Mr. Mangala Ram, (present-in-person)

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FARJAND ALI

Order

21/08/2023

1. The instant criminal appeal is barred by limitation from 224

days. An application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act has

been filed, which is allowed for the reasons and grounds

mentioned therein and the delay in filing the appeal is condoned.

2. The instant criminal appeal under Section 14-A(2) ofthe

SC/ST Act has been preferred being aggrieved ofthe order dated

(2 of 3) [CRLAS-1611/2023]

03.11.2022 passed by the learned Special Judge, SC/ST Act

Cases, Pali in Sessions Case No.176/2020, whereby the learned

court below framed charges against the appellants for the offences

under Sections 458, 323/34 of the IPC and Section 3(1)(R), 3(2)

(5), 3(2)(5A) of the SC/ST Act.

3. The lawyers are abstaining from work today. The appellant

No.1 Kishan Gurjar and the respondent No.2 Mangla Ram are

present in the person.

4. A plea has been raised on account of fact that after filing of

charge-sheet the parties have entered into a compromise and

have amicably settled the dispute finally. The compromise deed

as well as the affidavit of Mangala Ram S/o Gyanaram Meghwal is

on record. Mr. Mangala Ram, the complainant is present in person.

His identity has been verified by examining his personal

documents and a copy of the Aadhaar Card has been taken on

record. Upon verification, the complainant shows his willingness to

stifle the criminal proceedings against the accused appellants.

After conferring with him, this court is satisfied that the

complainant is not under duress or any threat or coercion, rather

he did the compromise as per his own free will and volition. It is

stated that with the efforts of the members of the society, they

have resolved the dispute and now he does not wish to continue

criminal proceedings against the accused appellants.

(3 of 3) [CRLAS-1611/2023]

5. I have gone through the material minutely and after going

through the niceties of the case and gravity of the offences it is

felt that for the purpose of permanent burial of dispute between

the parties and for reestablishment of harmony in the society and

in between the parties, it would be appropriate to quash the

proceedings by exercising power under Section 482 Cr.P.C.

Reliance can be placed upon the judgment of Hon'ble Supreme

Court in the case of Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab & Anr.

reported in (2012) 10 SCC 303, wherein it is propounded that if

the parties resolve the dispute amicably and the matter does not

pertain to breach of public peace and essentially, or it appears that

it is a dispute inter se/between the parties, then in such

circumstances, with a view to establish harmony between two

families, the proceedings can be quashed by the high Court while

exercising the power under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C.

6. Accordingly, the instant criminal appeal is allowed. The order

dated 03.11.2022 framing charge against the appellants and all

proceedings in Sessions Case No.176/2020 emanating from FIR

No.128/2020 registered at the Police Station Sojat City, Pali are

quashed and set aside and the appellants are acquitted from the

charges levelled against them. The appellants are on bail. Their

bail bonds are discharged.

(FARJAND ALI),J 110-Samvedana/-

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter