Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 5613 Raj
Judgement Date : 4 August, 2023
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S.B. Criminal Misc. Suspension of Sentence Application (Appeal) No.919/2023
IN
S.B. Criminal Appeal No. 1519/2023
Firoz Khan S/o Sh. Faiz Mohammed, Aged About 30 Years, 2-T/32, Shanti Nagar, Sector No. 5, Hiran Magri P.s., Udaipur, Dist. Udaipur.
----Appellant Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP
----Respondent
For Appellant(s) : Mr. Kaushal Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Gourav Singh, AGA
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FARJAND ALI
Order
04/08/2023
1. The instant application for suspension of sentence has been
moved on behalf of the applicant in the matter of judgment
dated 09.06.2023 passed by learned Sessions Judge,
Udaipur in Sessions Case No.168/2022 whereby he was
convicted and sentenced to suffer maximum punishment of
one year simple imprisonment along with compensation fine
of Rs.5,000/- under Sections 324 of IPC.
2. It is contended that the learned trial Judge has not
appreciated the correct, legal and factual aspects of the
matter and thus, reached at an erroneous conclusion of guilt,
therefore, the same is required to be appreciated again by
this court being the first appellate Court. Hearing of the
(2 of 3) [SOSA-919/2023]
appeal is likely to take long time, therefore, the application
for suspension of sentence may be granted.
3. Per contra, learned Additional Government Advocate has
vehemently opposed the prayer made by learned counsel for
the accused-applicant for releasing the appellant on
application for suspension of sentence.
4. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the
material available on record.
5. Upon consideration of the submissions of learned counsel for
the parties and looking to the totality of facts and
circumstances of the case, more particularly the facts that
hearing of appeal is likely to take further more time and
considering the overall submissions while refraining from
passing any comments on the niceties of the matter and the
defects of the prosecution as the same may put an adverse
effect on hearing of the appeal, this Court is of the opinion
that it is a fit case for suspending the sentence awarded to
the accused-appellant.
6. Accordingly, the application for suspension of sentence filed
under Section 389 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is ordered that
the sentence passed by learned Sessions Judge, Udaipur in
Sessions Case No.168/2022 against the appellant-applicant
Firoz Khan S/o Sh. Faiz Mohammed shall remain
suspended till final disposal of the aforesaid appeal and he
shall be released on bail provided he executes a personal
bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/-with two sureties of
Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial
Judge for his appearance in this Court on 04.09.2023 and
(3 of 3) [SOSA-919/2023]
whenever ordered to do so till the disposal of the appeal on
the conditions indicated below:-
1. That he will appear before the trial Court in the month of January of every year till the appeal is decided.
2. That if the applicant changes the place of residence, he will give in writing his changed address to the trial Court as well as to the counsel in the High Court.
3. Similarly, if the sureties change their address(s), they will give in writing their changed address to the trial Court.
(FARJAND ALI),J 237-Ashutosh/-
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!