Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 5498 Raj
Judgement Date : 2 August, 2023
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 5545/2023
Vikash S/o Shishpal, Aged About 22 Years, Dhani Khet Khud
Rohi, Gadhiichhani, Teh. Bhadra, Dist. Hanumangarh.
(At Present Lodged In Sub Jail Bhadra, Dist. Hanumangarh).
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr.R.S.Choudhary.
For Respondent(s) : Mr.Arjun Kumar, P.P.
For Complainant : Mr.Manjeet.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP MATHUR
ORDER
02/08/2023
This application for bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C. has been
filed by the petitioner who has been arrested in connection with
FIR No.336/2022 registered at Police Station Bhirani, District
Hanumangarh, for offences under Sections 302, 306 and 34 IPC. Learned counsel submitted that as per prosecution, on
29.10.2022, deceased Rajkumar committed suicide by consuming
poison. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the
petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case. Learned
counsel submitted that the allegations against the petitioner along
with co-accused persons is of beating and mentally torturing the
deceased. Learned counsel submitted that there is no evidence to
show that the petitioner by any of his act instigated or abetted the
deceased to commit suicide. Learned counsel submitted that the
essential ingredients of the offence under Section 306 IPC i.e.
(2 of 3) [CRLMB-5545/2023]
abetment, intention of the accused to aid or instigate or abet the
deceased to commit suicide are not available in the present case
and therefore, the offence punishable under Section 306 IPC is not
made out against the present petitioner. Learned counsel
submitted that enmity between the parties or beating due to
previous animosity between the parties cannot be made a ground
to make a person accused for the offence under Section 306 IPC.
Reliance was placed on the judgment rendered by Hon'ble
Supreme Court in the case of M.Arjuna Vs. State, represented
by Inspector of Police reported in (2019)3 SCC 315.
Learned counsel submitted that the petitioner is in judicial
custody, challan has been filed and the trial of the case will take
sufficiently long time, therefore, the benefit of bail should be
granted to the accused-petitioner.
Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor and learned counsel for
the complainant have vehemently opposed the bail application.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Public
Prosecutor and learned counsel for the complainant. Perused the
material available on record.
Having considered the rival submissions, facts and
circumstances of the case and having gone through the precedent
law cited at bar by learned counsel for the petitioner, this Court
prima facie finds that the essential ingredients of
instigation/abetment to commit suicide are not satisfied in the
present case. Thus, without expressing any opinion on
merits/demerits of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the
petitioner on bail.
(3 of 3) [CRLMB-5545/2023]
Accordingly, the bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is
allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner- Vikash S/o
Shishpal shall be enlarged on bail in connection with FIR
No.336/2022 registered at Police Station Bhirani, District
Hanumangarh, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum
of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the
satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his appearance before
the court concerned on all the dates of hearing as and when called
upon to so.
It is however, made clear that findings recorded/observations
made above are for limited purposes of adjudication of bail
application. The trial court shall not get prejudiced by the same.
(KULDEEP MATHUR),J /tarun goyal/
Sr.No.403
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!