Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 3234 Raj/2
Judgement Date : 7 August, 2023
[2023:RJ-JP:16927]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 831/2021
In
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.16689/2018
Ramveer Singh S/o Shri Balvir Singh, Aged About 34 Years, R/o
Ward No. 25, Kumher Road, Nadbai, Bharatpur, District
Bharatpur. Rajasthan.
----Petitioner
Versus
1. Shri P.c. Kishan Secretary-Cum-Commissioner, Panchayati
Raj Department Rajasthan, Jaipur.
2. Shri Sushil Kumar, The Chief Executive Officer, Cum-
Additional Examination Controller, Zila Parishad,
Bharatpur, Rajasthan.
3. Shri Jasmeet Singh Sandhu, The Chief Executive Officer,
Cum- Additional Examnination Controller, Zila Parishad,
Alwar Rajasthan.
4. State Of Rajasthan Through Secretary-Cum-
Commissioner, Panchayati Raj Department, Rajasthan.
Jaipur.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Abhi Goyal For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL
Judgment / Order
07/08/2023
This contempt petition has been filed alleging willful
disobedience of the order dated 20.01.2021 passed by this Court
whereby, the respondents were directed to take steps for
consideration for appointment of the petitioner with a further
direction to treat appointment from the date persons lesser in
[2023:RJ-JP:16927] (2 of 2) [CCP-831/2021]
merit have been given appointment notionally for the purpose of
seniority.
Learned counsel for the respondents has submitted a copy of
the Office order dated 03.08.2023 issued by the Development
Officer, Panchayat Samiti, Kathumar for perusal of this Court. The
order is taken on record.
Inviting attention of this Court towards the aforesaid order,
learned counsel submits that the petitioner was already appointed
vide order dated 24.11.2022 and he has also been extended
benefit of notional seniority from the date persons junior to him
was appointed. He, therefore, prays for dismissal of the contempt
petition.
Per contra, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that no
seniority list has been published till date.
Heard. Considered.
In view of the Office order dated 03.08.2023, this Court is
satisfied that there has been substantial compliance of the order
dated 20.01.2021, contempt whereof is alleged.
Resultantly, this contempt petition is dismissed.
Notices are discharged.
(MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL),J
Sudha/331
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!