Saturday, 16, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Ram Niwas vs State Of Rajasthan ...
2023 Latest Caselaw 2929 Raj

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 2929 Raj
Judgement Date : 12 April, 2023

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur
Ram Niwas vs State Of Rajasthan ... on 12 April, 2023
Bench: Vinit Kumar Mathur

[2023/RJJD/009654]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 4756/2023

Ram Niwas S/o Rugha Ram, Aged About 44 Years, R/o. VPO Moondsar, Tehsil and District Bikaner (Raj.).

----Petitioner Versus

1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary, Rural Development And Panchayati Raj Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur.

2. The Additional Commissioner, Rural Development And Panchayati Raj Department, Secretariat, Jaipur.

3. Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad Alwar, District Alwar.

----Respondents

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ramesh Kumar Prajapat For Respondent(s) : Mr. Piyush Bhandari

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINIT KUMAR MATHUR Order 12/04/2023

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the

issue raised in the present writ petition is squarely covered by

order of this Court in Satdev v. State of Rajasthan & Ors.: S.B.

Civil Writ Petition No.9899/2019, decided on 25.7.2019, wherein,

this Court inter alia came to conclusion and directed as under:-

"In view thereof, the writ petition filed by the petitioner is allowed in light of judgment in the case of Om Prakash (supra). The petitioner may make a representation to the respondents pointing out the requisite dates etc., based on which, the respondents would deal with the representation while according notional benefits to the petitioner from the date persons similarly situated to the petitioner, were accorded appointment by the respondents.

Needful may be done by the respondents within a period of four weeks from the date such representation alongwith a copy of this order is placed by the petitioner before the respondents."

[2023/RJJD/009654] (2 of 2) [CW-4756/2023]

Learned counsel for the respondents is not in a position to

dispute that the issue is identical to the case of Satdev (supra).

In view of the above fact situation, the writ petition filed by

the petitioner is allowed with similar directions as given in the

case of Satdev (supra).

(VINIT KUMAR MATHUR),J 309-Shahenshah/-

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter