Thursday, 23, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Salman Khan vs State Of Rajasthan
2022 Latest Caselaw 11949 Raj

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 11949 Raj
Judgement Date : 28 September, 2022

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur
Salman Khan vs State Of Rajasthan on 28 September, 2022
Bench: Pushpendra Singh Bhati
     HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
                      JODHPUR
               S.B. Criminal Appeal No. 1559/2022

1.      Salman Khan S/o Sh. Mithu Khan, Aged About 57 Years,
        B/c Muslim, R/o Talo Ki Dhani Aau, Ps Bhojasar, Dist.
        Jodhpur (Raj.)
2.      Sh. Jabaar Khan S/o Museh Khan, Aged About 38 Years,
        B/c Muslim, R/o Haji Sagar, Aau Distt. Jodhpur (Raj.)
3.      Sh. Kamardin S/o Museh Khan, Aged About 33 Years, B/c
        Muslim, R/o Haji Sagar, Aau Distt. Jodhpur (Raj.)
4.      Bacchu Khan S/o Salman Khan, Aged About 30 Years, B/c
        Muslim, R/o Haji Sagar, Aau Distt. Jodhpur (Raj.)
                                                                  ----Appellants
                                    Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
                                                                 ----Respondent


For Appellant(s)          :     Mr. Sanjay Bishnoi.
For Respondent(s)         :     Mr. Arun Kumar, PP.



     HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI

                                     Order

28/09/2022
     Admit.

     Issue notice.

     Learned Public Prosecutor accepts notice on behalf of the

respondent-State. Hence, notice need not be issued.

     Call for the record.

     Heard learned counsel for the parties on S.B. Suspension

of Sentence (Appeal) No.923/2022

     Learned counsel for the appellants makes a statement at Bar

that the certificate of surrender has been filed before this Court, a

copy of which he has passed on to this Court. Learned counsel


                     (Downloaded on 29/09/2022 at 08:43:08 PM)
                                        (2 of 3)                   [CRLAS-1559/2022]


further submits that the sentence awarded to the accused-

appellants has already been suspended by the learned trial court

temporarily on 16.09.2022.

     Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the submissions.

     Having considered the totality of facts and circumstances of

the case, this Court deems it just and proper to suspend the

substantive sentence awarded to the accused appellants.

     Accordingly,     S.B.     Suspension            of    Sentence     (Appeal)

No.923/2022 filed under Section 389 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is

ordered that the substantive sentence passed by the trial court

vide judgment dated 16.09.2022 in Sessions Case No.1/2014

against appellants (1) Salman Khan S/o Sh. Mithu Khan, (2)

Sh. Jabaar Khan S/o Museh Khan, (3) Sh. Kamardin S/o

Museh Khan and (4) Bacchu Khan S/o Salman Khan shall

remain suspended till final disposal of the aforesaid appeal,

provided each of them executes a personal bond in a sum of

Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the

satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for their appearance in this

Court on 02.11.2022 and whenever ordered to do so, till the

disposal of the appeal on the conditions indicated below:-

     1.    That they will appear before the trial Court in the

           month of January of every year till the appeal is

           decided.

     2.    That if the appellants changes the place of

           residence, they will give in writing their changed

           address to the trial Court as well as to the counsel

           in the High Court.

     3.    Similarly, if the sureties change their address,

                      (Downloaded on 29/09/2022 at 08:43:08 PM)
                                                                             (3 of 3)                   [CRLAS-1559/2022]


                                                 they will give in writing their changed address to

                                                 the trial Court.

                                         The learned trial Court shall keep the record of attendance of

                                   the accused-appellants in a separate file. Such file be registered

                                   as Criminal misc. Case related to original case in which the

                                   accused-appellants were tried and convicted. A copy of this order

                                   shall also be placed in that file for ready reference. Criminal Misc.

                                   file shall not be taken into account for statistical purpose relating

                                   to pendency and disposal of cases in the trial court. In case the

                                   said accused appellants do not appear before the trial court, the

                                   learned trial Judge shall report the matter to the High Court for

                                   cancellation of bail.


                                                                    (DR.PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI), J.

213-/Jitender//-

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IDRC

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter